On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Jacob Toddjaketodd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:41:51PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I was updating my wife's machine today and noticed that there are a
number of older/stranded gcc-config's left on the machine. I still
have gcc-4.1.2 but the
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Penguin Lover Mark Knecht squawked:
dragonfly ~ # emerge -Cp =cat/pack-ver
!!! '=cat/pack-ver' is not a valid package atom.
!!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details.
dragonfly ~ #
dragonfly ~ # eix pack-ver
No matches found.
dragonfly ~ #
The
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Willie Wongww...@math.princeton.edu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Penguin Lover Mark Knecht squawked:
dragonfly ~ # emerge -Cp =cat/pack-ver
!!! '=cat/pack-ver' is not a valid package atom.
!!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details.
I was updating my wife's machine today and noticed that there are a
number of older/stranded gcc-config's left on the machine. I still
have gcc-4.1.2 but the other 3.3/3.4 versions should not remain.
How would I remove these?
Thanks,
Mark
dragonfly ~ # gcc-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.3
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:41:51PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I was updating my wife's machine today and noticed that there are a
number of older/stranded gcc-config's left on the machine. I still
have gcc-4.1.2 but the other 3.3/3.4 versions should not remain.
How would I remove these?
5 matches
Mail list logo