On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:56:52 -0500, Dale wrote:
Basically, I just emerged it and restarted KDE. It just worked. I
don't recall changing anything as far as configs go.
You don't need ivman with KDE, it has its own device detection
and automounting.
--
Neil Bothwick
I wonder how much
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:58:06 -0500, Dale wrote:
I have hal, dbus and ivman installed here. They work fine. Since it
works, that may be why it is not being updated. Don't fix what
works. ;-)
Then why are there 12 op[en bugs on ivman's bug tracker?
--
Neil Bothwick
My Go this amn
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:56:52 -0500, Dale wrote:
Basically, I just emerged it and restarted KDE. It just worked. I
don't recall changing anything as far as configs go.
You don't need ivman with KDE, it has its own device detection
and automounting.
I
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:58:06 -0500, Dale wrote:
I have hal, dbus and ivman installed here. They work fine. Since it
works, that may be why it is not being updated. Don't fix what
works. ;-)
Then why are there 12 op[en bugs on ivman's bug tracker?
On Sunday 12 October 2008 00:52:52 Dale wrote:
I used to use supermount too. Switching for me was pretty easy tho. I
had some compatibility issues between versions of hal and ivman once but
nothing really major, just annoying as usual.
I guess I'm one of those, if it works, just use it.
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 12 October 2008 00:52:52 Dale wrote:
I used to use supermount too. Switching for me was pretty easy tho. I
had some compatibility issues between versions of hal and ivman once but
nothing really major, just annoying as usual.
I guess I'm one of those, if
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
I'm looking into ivman and pmount for automounting amongst other things while
using e17.
ivman was last updated Feb 2007 according to the official sourceforge page,
and the maintainer is listed as . 18 months is a long time, so this
package looks like it's
I'm looking into ivman and pmount for automounting amongst other things while
using e17.
ivman was last updated Feb 2007 according to the official sourceforge page,
and the maintainer is listed as . 18 months is a long time, so this
package looks like it's unmaintained.
Is there a
Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2008 13:24:03 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
Is there a replacement for ivman?
What exactly do you do with it, which filesystems do you mount with it?
Bye...
Dirk
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:24:03PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I'm looking into ivman and pmount for automounting amongst other things while
using e17.
ivman was last updated Feb 2007 according to the official sourceforge page,
and the maintainer is listed as . 18 months is a long
Quoting Erik Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
No, but it develops incompatibilities over time...
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
On Saturday 11 October 2008 20:53:37 Erik Hahn wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:24:03PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I'm looking into ivman and pmount for automounting amongst other things
while using e17.
ivman was last updated Feb 2007 according to the official sourceforge
page, and
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:24:27PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Quoting Erik Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
No, but it develops incompatibilities over time...
So far, it works fine.
--
Norberto Bensa wrote:
Quoting Erik Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
No, but it develops incompatibilities over time...
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet
Erik Hahn wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:24:27PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Quoting Erik Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
No, but it develops incompatibilities over time...
So far, it works fine.
+1
On Saturday 11 October 2008 15:18:24 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2008 13:24:03 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
Is there a replacement for ivman?
What exactly do you do with it, which filesystems do you mount with it?
At the moment mostly just hot-plug stuff on USB with your standard
On Saturday 11 October 2008 14:59:30 Florian Philipp wrote:
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
I'm looking into ivman and pmount for automounting amongst other things
while using e17.
ivman was last updated Feb 2007 according to the official sourceforge
page, and the maintainer is listed as .
On Saturday 11 October 2008 22:58:06 Dale wrote:
I have hal, dbus and ivman installed here. They work fine. Since it
works, that may be why it is not being updated. Don't fix what works. ;-)
How have you got it set up and how long has it been that way? Experienced any
brokenness while
Dale writes:
Erik Hahn wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:24:27PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Quoting Erik Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
No, but it develops incompatibilities over time...
So far, it works fine.
+1
If
Alan McKinnon schrieb am 11.10.2008 23:06:
On Saturday 11 October 2008 15:18:24 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2008 13:24:03 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
Is there a replacement for ivman?
What exactly do you do with it, which filesystems do you mount with it?
At the moment mostly
On Saturday 11 October 2008 23:40:37 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
If there's something better than ivman, or if I really should be
configuration HAL directly, then I'm all ears, but I do get the
impression that one really should be working with HAL via a front-end for
true ease of use
I also
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Erik Hahn wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:24:27PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Quoting Erik Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
No, but it develops
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 11 October 2008 22:58:06 Dale wrote:
I have hal, dbus and ivman installed here. They work fine. Since it
works, that may be why it is not being updated. Don't fix what works. ;-)
How have you got it set up and how long has it been that way?
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:46:17PM +0200, Patrick Marquetecken [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for replacements for:
mailx/mail; for a machine without a MTA and that can send mail with
attachments via a smpt server on the network.
Use mailx/mail/nail with msmtp. It will either
24 matches
Mail list logo
