Nick Rout schrieb:
I wasted days getting NFS to not work. I switched to CIFS. It is working very
well.
Is file locking working over CIFS? How about permissions
and ownership? Working as well and easy as it does on NFS?
What kind of problems did you have with NFS - I'm asking,
as I can't
On 7/22/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Rout schrieb: I wasted days getting NFS to not work. I switched to CIFS. It is working very well.Is file locking working over CIFS? How about permissionsand ownership? Working as well and easy as it does on NFS?
What kind of problems did
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 09:41:51 +0200
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Rout schrieb:
I wasted days getting NFS to not work. I switched to CIFS. It is working
very well.
Is file locking working over CIFS?
I don't know and I really don't need it, I am basically storing
Hi folks,
what network filesystem would you suggest for an small LAN ?
I'm currently running NFS on 2.4 and 2.6, the machines are
somethimes mounting each other, and that's not really satisfying
(ie. load loops up, locking fails, etc).
cu
--
Enrico Weigelt schrieb:
what network filesystem would you suggest for an small LAN ?
NFS. If Windows systems need to access the resources, I'd think
about installing MS SFU on those boxes.
Alexander Skwar
--
bureaucrat, n:
A politician who has tenure.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Enrico Weigelt schrieb:
what network filesystem would you suggest for an small LAN ?
NFS. If Windows systems need to access the resources, I'd think
about installing MS SFU on those boxes.
I spent a week fighting with SFU on 2003 last month. While I'm sure I
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:08:51 -0700
kashani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Enrico Weigelt schrieb:
what network filesystem would you suggest for an small LAN ?
NFS. If Windows systems need to access the resources, I'd think
about installing MS SFU on those boxes.
7 matches
Mail list logo
