On 2/3/06, Hans-Werner Hilse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can recommend NPTL for situations where threading really matters. And
> it only speeds threading, so whether using it or not is a matter of
> analyzing your application landscape...
I agree. Java applications in particular seem to benefi
Hi,
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:40:39 -0500
fire-eyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Myself I tried ntpl (and also ntplonly at someones suggestion). It is
> supposed to offer better thread support, especially if you have an SMP
> or dual core system. I have an SMP system.
It's just more lightweight by
Ooop... my apologies... it's NPTL! Duh me!!!
http://gentoo-wiki.com/NPTL
fire-eyes wrote:
> Jeff wrote:
>
>>Just wondering - how would my system benefit from using ntpl/ntplonly? I
>>don't see very much 'official' documentation of these USE flags, but
>>Googling, I see a lot of people using it t
Jeff wrote:
> Just wondering - how would my system benefit from using ntpl/ntplonly? I
> don't see very much 'official' documentation of these USE flags, but
> Googling, I see a lot of people using it to 'optimize' their gcc/system.
>
> Anyone care to comment?
>
Myself I tried ntpl (and also ntp
Just wondering - how would my system benefit from using ntpl/ntplonly? I
don't see very much 'official' documentation of these USE flags, but
Googling, I see a lot of people using it to 'optimize' their gcc/system.
Anyone care to comment?
--
Luke can't levitate his X-Wing out of the bog.
Luke Sk
5 matches
Mail list logo
