On 2013-11-15 5:18 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/11/2013 23:58, Tanstaafl wrote:
Now, the question is, what the heck is thin-provisioning in lvm2, am I
using it, and if not, do I need it?
I'm pretty sure I'm not using it, but how to be sure?
If you use thin
On 2013-11-15 5:18 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/11/2013 23:58, Tanstaafl wrote:
Now, the question is, what the heck is thin-provisioning in lvm2, am I
using it, and if not, do I need it?
I'm pretty sure I'm not using it, but how to be sure?
Google for
2013/11/15 Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com
Not an answer to your question, but yesterday ruby got pulled in by an
update to thin-provisioning-tools, which was required by lvm2.
It looks like ruby is only required for the tests of
sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools [1].
The new ebuild
On 2013-11-15 5:56 AM, Daniel Pielmeier bil...@gentoo.org wrote:
The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you
update to this version and don't use FEATURES=test it should not pull
in ruby anymore.
I don't have FEATURES=test and it still wants to pull all the ruby
2013/11/15 Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
On 2013-11-15 5:56 AM, Daniel Pielmeier bil...@gentoo.org wrote:
The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you
update to this version and don't use FEATURES=test it should not pull
in ruby anymore.
I don't have
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you
update to this version and don't use FEATURES=test it should not pull
in ruby anymore.
I don't have FEATURES=test and it still wants to pull all
Chris Stankevitz schrieb am 15.11.2013 16:29:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you
update to this version and don't use FEATURES=test it should not pull
in ruby anymore.
I don't
On 2013-11-15 5:56 AM, Daniel Pielmeier bil...@gentoo.org wrote:
2013/11/15 Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com
mailto:adamcart...@gmail.com
Not an answer to your question, but yesterday ruby got pulled in by
an update to thin-provisioning-tools, which was required by lvm2.
It looks like
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Ok, so... is there or is there not a way to prevent ruby from being
installed?
Yes
I've tried adding -ruby and -test to package.mask for
thin-provisioning-tools, and even tried adding them to USE= in make.conf, to
On 2013-11-15 3:01 PM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
Follow these steps:
0. undo whatever you did
Already did...
1. emerge --sync
2. echo =sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 ~amd64
/etc/portage/package.keywords
3. update your system
Or, I could just echo
On 15/11/2013 23:58, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-11-15 3:01 PM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
Follow these steps:
0. undo whatever you did
Already did...
1. emerge --sync
2. echo =sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 ~amd64
/etc/portage/package.keywords
3.
Hello,
If possible please phrase your response in a way that will make sense
to someone who was no idea what is ruby, has no desire to learn what
is ruby, and who doesn't [directly] even want ruby on his system.
True or false: The correct way to appease portage's error message
below is to add a
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Chris Stankevitz
chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
If possible please phrase your response in a way that will make sense
to someone who was no idea what is ruby, has no desire to learn what
is ruby, and who doesn't [directly] even want ruby on his
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Chris Stankevitz
chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
If possible please phrase your response in a way that will make sense
to someone who was no idea what is ruby, has no desire to learn what
is ruby, and who doesn't [directly] even want ruby on his
14 matches
Mail list logo
