On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:06:36 -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2
Why does the atom ~dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2 NOT apply to
dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.9-r2?
It applies to version 4.2 and all revisions. 4.2.9 is a different version
You need one of
On 02/07/2013 10:04, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:06:36 -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2
Why does the atom ~dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2 NOT apply to
dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk-4.2.9-r2?
It applies to version 4.2 and all revisions. 4.2.9 is a different
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
You probably already spotted this but just in case
stable sdk is v2.02.0807.1535
stable toolkit is 4.2.9-r2
Alan,
I did not notice that. Thank you, it all makes sense now!
Chris
Hello,
I'm particularly paranoid about my CUDA setup. I do not understand
CUDA except enough to declare that if my machine has CUDA 4.2
installed my life will be easy. This is because I compile software
that supposedly needs CUDA 4.2.
Can someone please translate the emerge -Dauv snip below
On 01/07/2013 23:18, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Hello,
I'm particularly paranoid about my CUDA setup. I do not understand
CUDA except enough to declare that if my machine has CUDA 4.2
installed my life will be easy. This is because I compile software
that supposedly needs CUDA 4.2.
Can
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/07/2013 23:18, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
It says it's going to downgrade nvidia-cuda-sdk,but it doesn't say why.
For that:
$ eix dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk
* dev-util/nvidia-cuda-sdk
Available versions:
6 matches
Mail list logo
