On Tuesday 21 June 2011 16:36:32 Mark Knecht wrote:
> Point taken about s/S. I didn't know there was an accepted standard to
> use 's'.
Come to think of it, it may not apply to you (in which case apologies): it's
an SI unit.
--
Rgds
Peter
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 01:28:05 Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> I get about 8MB/S download but only about 250KB/S upload.
>
> Should those B's be b's? In other words, bits instead of bytes? Or are you
> on something much faster than DSL? In either
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 01:28:05 Mark Knecht wrote:
I get about 8MB/S download but only about 250KB/S upload.
Should those B's be b's? In other words, bits instead of bytes? Or are you
on something much faster than DSL? In either case the S's ought to be s's.
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 01:28:05 Mark Knecht wrote:
> I get about 8MB/S download but only about 250KB/S upload.
Should those B's be b's? In other words, bits instead of bytes? Or are you
on something much faster than DSL? In either case the S's ought to be s's.
On ADSL I get about 900KB/s down
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:28:05PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Indi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:25:57AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
> >> into 100 100MB files to transfer ove
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Indi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:25:57AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
>> into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
>> use cat to reassemble?
>>
>> Is t
On Monday 20 Jun 2011 22:06:59 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:25:57AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
> >> into 100 100MB files to transfer ove
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:25:57AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
> into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
> use cat to reassemble?
>
>Is there some better way to do this?
>
Just using rsync
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:25:57AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
>> Hi,
>> Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
>> into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
>> use cat to reassemble?
>>
>>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:25:57AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
> Hi,
>Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
> into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
> use cat to reassemble?
>
>Is there some better way to do this?
That's what split
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Nils Larsson wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2011 08:25:57 Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
>> into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
>> use cat to reassemble?
>>
>> Is th
On Monday 20 June 2011 08:25:57 Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
> into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
> use cat to reassemble?
>
>Is there some better way to do this?
Maybe not better, but you cou
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20 2011, Paul Hartman wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
>>> into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsy
> I was unsure whether rsync would restart where it left off or whether
> it would start over from the beginning. It's one huge file so it would
> be painful if it did the latter. This way I know my risk is at most
> 100MB, or maybe 20MB if I break the original up into smaller pieces.
check out th
On Mon, Jun 20 2011, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
>> into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
>> use cat to reassemble?
>
> I think it should wor
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
>> into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
>> use cat to reassemble?
>
> I think i
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
> Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
> into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
> use cat to reassemble?
I think it should work just fine. I've split huge files into huge
chunks
Hi,
Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
use cat to reassemble?
Is there some better way to do this?
Thanks,
Mark
18 matches
Mail list logo
