Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-30 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 01:20:37 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote: I'll put it on the laptop when OOo finally finishes compiling, although r20 will probably be put by then... I'll say it again, *this* is why I only update when there is a *good* reason to. Are two GLSAs on the most recent version

Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-29 Thread Robert G. Hays
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:24:40 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote: snip s -r5 ok? Seems so. I've put it on three computers and no gotchas so far. I'll put it on the laptop when OOo finally finishes compiling, although r20 will probably be put by then... I'll say it again,

Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-28 Thread Taka John Brunkhorst
Michael W. Holdeman wrote: On Tuesday 26 April 2005 04:19 am, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:02:36 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: Today it is calling for 2.0.51.20-r4, any problems here? not any more. It did stop emerge working altogether on two computers here, but

Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-26 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:02:36 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: Today it is calling for 2.0.51.20-r4, any problems here? not any more. It did stop emerge working altogether on two computers here, but resyncing and re-emerging it seemed to fix the problem (I noticed the USE flags for portage had

Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-26 Thread Michael W. Holdeman
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 04:19 am, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:02:36 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: Today it is calling for 2.0.51.20-r4, any problems here? not any more. It did stop emerge working altogether on two computers here, but resyncing and re-emerging it seemed to

Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-25 Thread Michael W. Holdeman
On Saturday 23 April 2005 11:02 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: On Sunday 24 April 2005 08:26, Renat Golubchyk wrote: Hi! A big WARNING. Do NOT update to portage 2.0.51.20-r2! /etc has been removed from CONFIG_PROTECT in make.globals, so your next update of baselayout will overwrite your

Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-25 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:02:12 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote: Today it is calling for 2.0.51.20-r4, any problems here? not any more. It did stop emerge working altogether on two computers here, but resyncing and re-emerging it seemed to fix the problem (I noticed the USE flags for portage had

Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-23 Thread Nick Rout
On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 01:26 +0200, Renat Golubchyk wrote: Hi! A big WARNING. Do NOT update to portage 2.0.51.20-r2! /etc has been removed from CONFIG_PROTECT in make.globals, so your next update of baselayout will overwrite your configs! Do not update portage until the issue is resolved

Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-23 Thread Nick Rout
On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 02:06 +0200, Renat Golubchyk wrote: On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:47:40 +1200 Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 01:26 +0200, Renat Golubchyk wrote: Do NOT update to portage 2.0.51.20-r2! /etc has been removed from CONFIG_PROTECT in make.globals, so

Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING: /etc removed from CONFIG_PROTECT portage-2.0.51.20

2005-04-23 Thread Peter Gordon
That's why you keep backups. ;-) Anyways, Thanks for the warning, Renat. I've added it to my package.mask just to be safe. (I'm running a full ~x86 setup on my desktop box.) Is -r1 safe to use? -- () The ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML Email, /\ vCards, and proprietary formats.