Re: [gentoo-user] Wesnoth version

2007-05-06 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Saturday 05 May 2007, Marko Kocić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Wesnoth version': [I]f let's try to rename ebuild and see what happens when the new version is released, I'll be glad to help by sending reports to this list. Better to file version-bump bugs to b.g.o

[gentoo-user] Wesnoth version

2007-05-05 Thread Marko Kocić
Is there a specific reason why gentoo doesn't provide development versions of Battle for Wesnoth (games-strategy/wesnoth)? I couldn't find anything in bug database. Development versions (1.3.2) are pretty stable, so I can't see a reason why are not included in ~x86. As for x86, 1.2.4 (latest

Re: [gentoo-user] Wesnoth version

2007-05-05 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Saturday 05 May 2007, Marko Kocić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about '[gentoo-user] Wesnoth version': Is there a specific reason why gentoo doesn't provide development versions of Battle for Wesnoth (games-strategy/wesnoth)? I couldn't find anything in bug database. Development versions (1.3.2

Re: [gentoo-user] Wesnoth version

2007-05-05 Thread Marko Kocić
On 5/5/07, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, a new numbered release deserves it's own ebuild, even if it has to linger in package.mask. Make sure it's been 2-3 days after the release and then file a version bump bug. Please report if simply renaming the existing ebuild