On Saturday 05 May 2007, Marko Kocić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Wesnoth version':
[I]f let's try to rename ebuild and see what
happens when the new version is released, I'll be glad to help by
sending reports to this list.
Better to file version-bump bugs to b.g.o
Is there a specific reason why gentoo doesn't provide development
versions of Battle for Wesnoth (games-strategy/wesnoth)?
I couldn't find anything in bug database. Development versions (1.3.2)
are pretty stable, so I can't see a reason why are not included in
~x86. As for x86, 1.2.4 (latest
On Saturday 05 May 2007, Marko Kocić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Wesnoth version':
Is there a specific reason why gentoo doesn't provide development
versions of Battle for Wesnoth (games-strategy/wesnoth)?
I couldn't find anything in bug database. Development versions (1.3.2
On 5/5/07, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, a new numbered release deserves it's own ebuild, even if it has to
linger in package.mask. Make sure it's been 2-3 days after the release
and then file a version bump bug. Please report if simply renaming the
existing ebuild
4 matches
Mail list logo