Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with CAMERAS anyway?

2009-05-04 Thread Alexander Pilipovsky
I have compiled libgphoto by ./configure, make, make install way. Us I understand, it does not use settings from make.conf? (If I understand question with my bad English :D) Arttu V. wrote: Hello, Inspired by the other digicam thread I took a quick look at an older problem of mine, namely

[gentoo-user] What's the deal with CAMERAS anyway?

2009-05-04 Thread Arttu V.
Hello, Inspired by the other digicam thread I took a quick look at an older problem of mine, namely getting libgphoto2 to compile drivers for all cameras. Anyone got a clue why *not* setting CAMERAS won't build drivers for all cameras as claimed several times in the libgphoto2 ebuild? All I see

Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with CAMERAS anyway?

2009-05-04 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Arttu V. arttu...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Inspired by the other digicam thread I took a quick look at an older problem of mine, namely getting libgphoto2 to compile drivers for all cameras. Anyone got a clue why *not* setting CAMERAS won't build drivers for

Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with CAMERAS anyway?

2009-05-04 Thread Arttu V.
On 5/4/09, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Arttu V. arttu...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone got a clue why *not* setting CAMERAS won't build drivers for all cameras as claimed several times in the libgphoto2 ebuild? src_configure() in the libgphoto2