Re: [gentoo-user] broken libraries but library-linking is consistent ;-)

2006-06-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:39:51 -0700, Richard Fish wrote: > Damn, and I was _so_ hoping that was really a valid USE flag! :-> > That would have to be the coolest flag ever... Nah! The coolest, froopiest ever would be USE="towel" :) -- Neil Bothwick I'd prefer the non-smoking lifeboat, please.

Re: [gentoo-user] broken libraries but library-linking is consistent ;-)

2006-06-14 Thread Richard Fish
On 6/14/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: up a small amount of disk space. They won't start to think for themselves unless you have skynet in your USE flags. Damn, and I was _so_ hoping that was really a valid USE flag! :-> That would have to be the coolest flag ever...we must find a

Re: [gentoo-user] broken libraries but library-linking is consistent ;-)

2006-06-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:25:11 +0200, Norman Rieß wrote: > No, but my flags contain USE="hive-mind". Any problems with that? Not if you're a Windows user ;-) -- Neil Bothwick I will always cherish the initial misconceptions I had about you. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] broken libraries but library-linking is consistent ;-)

2006-06-14 Thread Rumen Yotov
Norman Rieß wrote: > Hi > > according to revdep-rebuild, quite a few libraries on my system are broken. > But at the end of revdep-rebuild, it tells me, my system was consistent. > I think some libraries are really broken, because the sound of my vlc > player stutters sometimes lately. > I had som

Re: [gentoo-user] broken libraries but library-linking is consistent ;-)

2006-06-14 Thread Norman Rieß
Neil Bothwick schrieb: These files are owned by nothing and used by nothing. all they do is take up a small amount of disk space. They won't start to think for themselves unless you have skynet in your USE flags. No, but my flags contain USE="hive-mind". Any problems with that? -- gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] broken libraries but library-linking is consistent ;-)

2006-06-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:51:59 +0200 (CEST), Norman Rieß wrote: > But why wasn´t this deleted by a emerge --depclean world or the unmerge > in the update-process of that packages. Because the files' datestamps and/or checksums had changed since they were installed. Portage won't remove a file that

Re: [gentoo-user] broken libraries but library-linking is consistent ;-)

2006-06-14 Thread Norman Rieß
> Norman Rieß wrote: >> broken /usr/kde/3.4/lib/kde3/kfileaudiopreview.la (requires >> /usr/kde/3.4/lib/libqtmcop.la) > > You have upgraded to KDE-3.5.* ? Then 'rm -r /usr/kde/3.4'. > >> broken /usr/lib/avifile-0.7/ac3pass.la (requires >> /usr/lib/libaviplayavformat.la) > > The avi stuff is ob

Re: [gentoo-user] broken libraries but library-linking is consistent ;-)

2006-06-14 Thread Benno Schulenberg
Norman Rieß wrote: > broken /usr/kde/3.4/lib/kde3/kfileaudiopreview.la (requires > /usr/kde/3.4/lib/libqtmcop.la) You have upgraded to KDE-3.5.* ? Then 'rm -r /usr/kde/3.4'. > broken /usr/lib/avifile-0.7/ac3pass.la (requires > /usr/lib/libaviplayavformat.la) The avi stuff is obsolete. Remo

[gentoo-user] broken libraries but library-linking is consistent ;-)

2006-06-14 Thread Norman Rieß
Hi according to revdep-rebuild, quite a few libraries on my system are broken. But at the end of revdep-rebuild, it tells me, my system was consistent. I think some libraries are really broken, because the sound of my vlc player stutters sometimes lately. I had some problems with the arts-daemon a