Re: [gentoo-user] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11 Failed to unpack

2008-12-15 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:48:47 -0500, Jeff Cranmer wrote: I've also discovered that the /etc/make.profile symlink was pointing at the x86 default-linux profile set, not the amd64 profile. I'm attempting a recompile now with the symlink changed, and hopefully this will fix my problems. I

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11 Failed to unpack

2008-12-15 Thread Jeff Cranmer
On Monday 15 December 2008 03:40:00 am Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:48:47 -0500, Jeff Cranmer wrote: I've also discovered that the /etc/make.profile symlink was pointing at the x86 default-linux profile set, not the amd64 profile. I'm attempting a recompile now with the

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11 Failed to unpack

2008-12-14 Thread Jeff Cranmer
Thanks, That only adds more questions. My environment is amd64. It appears to have downloaded the i586 binary. Surely this is incorrect? my make.conf file contains the line CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -march=athlon-xp, which should trigger the 64 bit binaries to be downloaded and acted upon. The

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11 Failed to unpack

2008-12-14 Thread Jeff Cranmer
Progress: I've discovered that athlon64 is a valid gcc make flag, so I changed it back. I've also discovered that the /etc/make.profile symlink was pointing at the x86 default-linux profile set, not the amd64 profile. I'm attempting a recompile now with the symlink changed, and hopefully this

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11 Failed to unpack

2008-12-14 Thread Jeff Cranmer
It looks like fixing the /etc/make.profile symlink fixed my problem. I'm still a little nervous about whether I need to run any other commands in order to prevent my system going wrong after making this correction. Jeff On Sunday 14 December 2008 09:48:47 pm Jeff Cranmer wrote: Progress:

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11 Failed to unpack

2008-12-14 Thread Dale
Jeff Cranmer wrote: It looks like fixing the /etc/make.profile symlink fixed my problem. I'm still a little nervous about whether I need to run any other commands in order to prevent my system going wrong after making this correction. Jeff Let me see if I understand correctly. You

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11 Failed to unpack

2008-12-13 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:03:43 -0500, Jeff Cranmer wrote: Failed to extract the files. Please refer to the Troubleshooting section of the Installation Instructions on the download page for more information. Did this help? -- Neil Bothwick The nice thing about Windows is - It does not just

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11 Failed to unpack

2008-12-13 Thread Jeff Cranmer
Perhaps it would have done if I knew where the download page was. On Saturday 13 December 2008 07:25:36 am Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:03:43 -0500, Jeff Cranmer wrote: Failed to extract the files. Please refer to the Troubleshooting section of the Installation Instructions

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11 Failed to unpack

2008-12-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Mestelan
2008/12/13 Jeff Cranmer jcranme...@earthlink.net Perhaps it would have done if I knew where the download page was. The file /usr/portage/dev-java/sun-jdk/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11.ebuild will disclose this information, and hints at https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/developer.html Regards.

[gentoo-user] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11 Failed to unpack

2008-12-12 Thread Jeff Cranmer
I am getting an error when I try to update sun-jdK /var/tmp/portage/dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11/distdir/jdk-6u11-dlj-linux-i586.bin: line 821: ./install.sfx.14482: No such file or directory Failed to extract the files. Please refer to the Troubleshooting section of the Installation Instructions