Justin Krejci wrote:
Yes, the second run and subsequent runs for a period of time all seem to be
fairly quick, but I thought it odd that my AMD64 system is always quick.
The initial slowdown is due to portage having to scan over the entire tree of
installed packages, calculating virtuals.
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 00:14 -0600, Justin Krejci wrote:
I have a system with a 1.33Ghz Athlon-XP with a decently fast IDE hard drive
I have a system with a 1.80Ghz AMD64 with a decently fast IDE hard drive
When I run emerge -s whatever or emerge sync or any emerge command
apparently, it
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:14:13 -0600, Justin Krejci wrote:
When I run emerge -s whatever or emerge sync or any emerge command
apparently, it usually takes about 1 second to start the command on the
AMD64 system whereas on the Athlon-XP system it usually takes about
10-30 seconds fore the
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:14:13 -0600, Justin Krejci wrote:
When I run emerge -s whatever or emerge sync or any emerge command
apparently, it usually takes about 1 second to start the command on the
AMD64 system whereas on the Athlon-XP system it usually takes about
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 03:59:51 -0600, Dale wrote:
I think the new portage is supposed to be better. That is what I have
read anyway. I dunno for sure. To chicken to keyword it. LOL
I run ~arch on everything, so this is still the case with portage 2.0.53.
My iBook, running the same version,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 03:59:51 -0600, Dale wrote:
I think the new portage is supposed to be better. That is what I have
read anyway. I dunno for sure. To chicken to keyword it. LOL
I run ~arch on everything, so this is still the case with portage 2.0.53.
My
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:24:32 -0600, Dale wrote:
I run ~arch on everything, so this is still the case with portage
2.0.53. My iBook, running the same version, doesn't have this issue.
I stand corrected. I thought I read that they had made some changes
that made things faster. Me confused
On Thursday 15 December 2005 03:49 am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:14:13 -0600, Justin Krejci wrote:
When I run emerge -s whatever or emerge sync or any emerge command
apparently, it usually takes about 1 second to start the command on the
AMD64 system whereas on the
On Thursday 15 December 2005 09:45 am, Richard Fish wrote:
On 12/14/05, Justin Krejci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I run emerge -s whatever or emerge sync or any emerge command
apparently, it usually takes about 1 second to start the command on the
AMD64 system whereas on the Athlon-XP
I have a system with a 1.33Ghz Athlon-XP with a decently fast IDE hard drive
I have a system with a 1.80Ghz AMD64 with a decently fast IDE hard drive
When I run emerge -s whatever or emerge sync or any emerge command
apparently, it usually takes about 1 second to start the command on the AMD64
10 matches
Mail list logo
