[gentoo-user] fooling portage a bit

2007-03-09 Thread John covici
OK, I have a couple of problems with what is considered a dependency -- I don't want gnopernicus, but its a dependency of gnome-base -- any way to fool portage that I have such a thing when I don't? Another one is mozilla-firefox I want to use the 3.0 nightly build compiled from source, can I

Re: [gentoo-user] fooling portage a bit

2007-03-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 10 March 2007 03:06:37 John covici wrote: OK, I have a couple of problems with what is considered a dependency -- I don't want gnopernicus, but its a dependency of gnome-base -- any way to fool portage that I have such a thing when I don't? Why don't you just disable the

Re: [gentoo-user] fooling portage a bit

2007-03-09 Thread John covici
on Saturday 03/10/2007 Bo Ørsted Andresen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote On Saturday 10 March 2007 03:06:37 John covici wrote: OK, I have a couple of problems with what is considered a dependency -- I don't want gnopernicus, but its a dependency of gnome-base -- any way to fool portage that I

Re: [gentoo-user] fooling portage a bit

2007-03-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 10 March 2007 03:59:46 John covici wrote: OK, I have a couple of problems with what is considered a dependency -- I don't want gnopernicus, but its a dependency of gnome-base -- any way to fool portage that I have such a thing when I don't? Why don't you just disable the

Re: [gentoo-user] fooling portage a bit

2007-03-09 Thread John covici
on Saturday 03/10/2007 Bo Ørsted Andresen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote On Saturday 10 March 2007 03:59:46 John covici wrote: OK, I have a couple of problems with what is considered a dependency -- I don't want gnopernicus, but its a dependency of gnome-base -- any way to fool portage