OK, I have a couple of problems with what is considered a dependency
-- I don't want gnopernicus, but its a dependency of gnome-base -- any
way to fool portage that I have such a thing when I don't? Another
one is mozilla-firefox I want to use the 3.0 nightly build compiled
from source, can I
On Saturday 10 March 2007 03:06:37 John covici wrote:
OK, I have a couple of problems with what is considered a dependency
-- I don't want gnopernicus, but its a dependency of gnome-base -- any
way to fool portage that I have such a thing when I don't?
Why don't you just disable the
on Saturday 03/10/2007 Bo Ørsted Andresen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
On Saturday 10 March 2007 03:06:37 John covici wrote:
OK, I have a couple of problems with what is considered a dependency
-- I don't want gnopernicus, but its a dependency of gnome-base -- any
way to fool portage that I
On Saturday 10 March 2007 03:59:46 John covici wrote:
OK, I have a couple of problems with what is considered a dependency
-- I don't want gnopernicus, but its a dependency of gnome-base -- any
way to fool portage that I have such a thing when I don't?
Why don't you just disable the
on Saturday 03/10/2007 Bo Ørsted Andresen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
On Saturday 10 March 2007 03:59:46 John covici wrote:
OK, I have a couple of problems with what is considered a dependency
-- I don't want gnopernicus, but its a dependency of gnome-base -- any
way to fool portage
5 matches
Mail list logo