On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 13:54 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
On 8/10/05, Craig Zeigler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the developers bothered to write stuff like that for every package
(most of them have changelogs BTW) Gentoo would be like Debian.. years
between releases
--
Yeah, true. Besides,
it is necessary to make any changes to get the packages from version
2005.1 while using 2005.0.
I read somewhere that we should change the symlink /etc/make.profile
to the new 2005.1 profile and resync, I dided and after sync there
where no updates for my system. Is this right ?
Thank you, Allan
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
it is necessary to make any changes to get the packages from version
2005.1 while using 2005.0.
I read somewhere that we should change the symlink /etc/make.profile
to the new 2005.1 profile and resync, I dided and after sync there
where no
Allan Spagnol Comar schreef:
it is necessary to make any changes to get the packages from version
2005.1 while using 2005.0.
I read somewhere that we should change the symlink /etc/make.profile
to the new 2005.1 profile and resync, I dided and after sync there
where no updates for my
-Original Message-
From: A. Khattri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2005 15:04
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] from 2005.0 to 2005.1
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
it is necessary to make any changes to get
Holly Bostick wrote:
Allan Spagnol Comar schreef:
it is necessary to make any changes to get the packages from version
2005.1 while using 2005.0.
I read somewhere that we should change the symlink /etc/make.profile
to the new 2005.1 profile and resync, I dided and after sync there
where no
Eugene Rosenzweig wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:47:13 +1000, Eugene Rosenzweig wrote:
I wish there were Release Notes supplied with the announcement of
the new release to satisfy curiosity of what is new/different in this
release.
Gentoo doesn't really have
7 matches
Mail list logo
