Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.3.x and Core 2 Duo, safe way

2008-06-09 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
=== On Monday 09 June 2008, Graham Murray wrote: === Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gcc-4.3.1 is umasked now. I'm on ~amd64 with Core 2 Duo CPU. Is it sufficient just to set CFLAGS=-O2 -march=core2 -mtune=core2 -pipe instead of CFLAGS=-O2 -march=native

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.3.x and Core 2 Duo, safe way

2008-06-09 Thread Justin
Graham Murray schrieb: Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gcc-4.3.1 is umasked now. I'm on ~amd64 with Core 2 Duo CPU. Is it sufficient just to set CFLAGS=-O2 -march=core2 -mtune=core2 -pipe instead of CFLAGS=-O2 -march=native -mtune=native -pipe which I have in make.conf now?

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.3.x and Core 2 Duo, safe way

2008-06-09 Thread Robert Bridge
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 06:43:41 +0100 Graham Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gcc-4.3.1 is umasked now. I'm on ~amd64 with Core 2 Duo CPU. Is it sufficient just to set CFLAGS=-O2 -march=core2 -mtune=core2 -pipe instead of CFLAGS=-O2

[gentoo-user] gcc-4.3.x and Core 2 Duo, safe way

2008-06-08 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
gcc-4.3.1 is umasked now. I'm on ~amd64 with Core 2 Duo CPU. Is it sufficient just to set CFLAGS=-O2 -march=core2 -mtune=core2 -pipe instead of CFLAGS=-O2 -march=native -mtune=native -pipe which I have in make.conf now? Are there any other things to do? Andrew --

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.3.x and Core 2 Duo, safe way

2008-06-08 Thread Graham Murray
Andrew Gaydenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gcc-4.3.1 is umasked now. I'm on ~amd64 with Core 2 Duo CPU. Is it sufficient just to set CFLAGS=-O2 -march=core2 -mtune=core2 -pipe instead of CFLAGS=-O2 -march=native -mtune=native -pipe which I have in make.conf now? Are there any other