Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.4 - "emere -e world" necessary?

2006-05-05 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Friday 05 May 2006 08:12, Graham Murray wrote: > "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > glibc updates NEVER need a rebuild. > > > > Only if you change from gcc 3.X to 4.Y you have to rebuild. > > > > But not because of a glibc update. > > That is not always true. A glibc upgrade

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.4 - "emere -e world" necessary?

2006-05-04 Thread Graham Murray
"Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > glibc updates NEVER need a rebuild. > > Only if you change from gcc 3.X to 4.Y you have to rebuild. > > But not because of a glibc update. That is not always true. A glibc upgrade *can* require that *some* packages are re-built. I am not an e

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.4 - "emere -e world" necessary?

2006-05-04 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Thursday 04 May 2006 19:25, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Hello! > > I'd now like to upgrade to glibc 2.4 as well. After having installed glibc > 2.4, is it required to have a full "emerge -e world" run; ie. rebuild the > entire system? no. glibc updates NEVER need a rebuild. Only if you change fr

[gentoo-user] glibc 2.4 - "emere -e world" necessary?

2006-05-04 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hello! I'd now like to upgrade to glibc 2.4 as well. After having installed glibc 2.4, is it required to have a full "emerge -e world" run; ie. rebuild the entire system? Thanks, Alexander Skwar -- NATHAN ... your PARENTS were in a CARCRASH!! They're VOIDED -- They COLLAPSED They had no CHAINS