On Monday 16 Jun 2014 00:23:15 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 22:55:09 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > I'm pretty sure this was a simple developer error.
> > >
> > > REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( connman networkmanager )" should have been
> > > REQUIRED_USE="?? ( connman networkmanager )".
> > >
> > >
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 22:55:09 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure this was a simple developer error.
> >
> > REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( connman networkmanager )" should have been
> > REQUIRED_USE="?? ( connman networkmanager )".
> >
> > The former requires that exactly one flag be enabled. The latter
On Sunday 15 Jun 2014 19:27:18 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> > I'm at a loss to explain why this is a good idea or desirable:
> >
> > !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy
> > ">=net-libs/gupnp-0.18[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_
>
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> You are probably correct, I filed a bug:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513310
>
Yes, and I responded to and fixed it earlier in the day. I was just
updating the list for those who care. ^_^
On 15/06/2014 20:27, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>> I'm at a loss to explain why this is a good idea or desirable:
>>
>> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy
>> ">=net-libs/gupnp-0.18[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,ab
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I'm at a loss to explain why this is a good idea or desirable:
>
> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy
> ">=net-libs/gupnp-0.18[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?]"
> has unmet requ
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 01:31:25 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Maybe I want farstream. Maybe I want upnp for it.
> Maybe I don't care for connman or networkmanager (I use wicd, some users
> want no nw manager at all)
>
> So, what is the sense behind a feature of an instant messenger framework
> causi
On Sunday 15 Jun 2014 00:31:25 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I'm at a loss to explain why this is a good idea or desirable:
>
> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy
> ">=net-libs/gupnp-0.18[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mi
> ps_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?]" has unmet requi
I'm at a loss to explain why this is a good idea or desirable:
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy
">=net-libs/gupnp-0.18[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?]"
has unmet requirements.
- net-libs/gupnp-0.20.12-r1::gentoo USE="introspection
9 matches
Mail list logo
