Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> > So do I file a bug on bgo, or is there some other way I should contact
> > the gnome overlay maintainers/?
> >
>
> I think the easiest way would be to report throught the #gentoo-desktop
> IRC channel. They migh
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> So do I file a bug on bgo, or is there some other way I should contact
> the gnome overlay maintainers/?
>
I think the easiest way would be to report throught the #gentoo-desktop
IRC channel. They might tell you to go to the bugzilla.
Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Well, I would be willing to do that, but the only difference between the
> > .999 ones and the regular ones is that the . ones inherit virtualx
> > and they have the following
> > inherit eutils gnome2 multilib-
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Well, I would be willing to do that, but the only difference between the
> .999 ones and the regular ones is that the . ones inherit virtualx
> and they have the following
> inherit eutils gnome2 multilib-minimal virtualx
> if [[ ${PV} =
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:09:07AM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Jc García wrote:
>
> > 2015-08-18 10:38 GMT-06:00 :
> > > So, how do I get the -
> > > versions of the ebuilds to give me all the correct files like the 2.16.x
> > > versions do? I know the - are from git, but it
Jc García wrote:
> 2015-08-18 10:38 GMT-06:00 :
> > So, how do I get the -
> > versions of the ebuilds to give me all the correct files like the 2.16.x
> > versions do? I know the - are from git, but it should do what
> > gentoo wants.
> This isn't realistic, you can't ask the devs to
2015-08-18 10:38 GMT-06:00 :
> So, how do I get the -
> versions of the ebuilds to give me all the correct files like the 2.16.x
> versions do? I know the - are from git, but it should do what
> gentoo wants.
This isn't realistic, you can't ask the devs to check every commit
upstream mak
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> OK, I have the following in /etc/portage/package.use
> app-accessibility/at-spi2-atk abi_x86_32
> app-accessibility/at-spi2-core abi_x86_32
Can you verify that these are being picked up properly by running
emerge -av at-spi2-atk at-spi2-co
Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/atk-bridge.2.0.pc is part of at-spi2-atk which comes
> as a dependency of gtk+[X]. So you need at-spi2-atk[abi_x86_32] which
> should be pulled in by gtk+[abi_x86_32]. emerge @preserved-rebuild, make
> sure all flag changes are applied (emerge --
/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/atk-bridge.2.0.pc is part of at-spi2-atk which comes
as a dependency of gtk+[X]. So you need at-spi2-atk[abi_x86_32] which
should be pulled in by gtk+[abi_x86_32]. emerge @preserved-rebuild, make
sure all flag changes are applied (emerge --changed-use --deep @world) and
the
Hi. I am trying to use at-spi2-core- and at-spi2-atk- from the
gnome overlay, but I am having some very peculiar things happening when
I emerge them.Both of them need to be abi_x86_32, gtk3 is also, but
when I emerge them it gives me existing preserved libs and wants me to
compilex11-li
11 matches
Mail list logo
