Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 08.10.2015 um 03:10 schrieb Rich Freeman:
>
>> Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they
>> were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of
>> the kernel tree and checkout from tags.
> I never really understood what diff
Am 08.10.2015 um 03:10 schrieb Rich Freeman:
> Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they
> were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of
> the kernel tree and checkout from tags.
I never really understood what difference the gentoo-patches make.
ge
On 2015-10-08 07:50, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:12:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > > Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they
> > > were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of
> >
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:12:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> Do you bother with the gentoo patches?
Only the Kconfig patch that gives quick access to gentoo required configs
is really useful, the rest I would call minor. If you copy your config
from gentoo-sources to the git tree, t
Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:12:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > > Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they
> > > were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of
> > > the kernel tree
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:12:28PM -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > Gentoo-sources keywording tends to lag a bit, though I thought they
> > were going to change that. I tend to just keep my own git clone of
> > the kernel tree and checkout from tags.
>
> Do you bo
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:34 PM, wrote:
> > Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using gentoo-sources, I will
> >> > sync and try again, maybe go to 4.1 and see what happens. I heard
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:34 PM, wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using gentoo-sources, I will
>> > sync and try again, maybe go to 4.1 and see what happens. I heard 3.19
>> > was the first version wher
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote:
> >
> > Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using gentoo-sources, I will
> > sync and try again, maybe go to 4.1 and see what happens. I heard 3.19
> > was the first version where btrfs actually worked, and I have 3.18 here,
>
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:13 PM, wrote:
>
> Thanks much -- 4.2.1 wqas what I just got using gentoo-sources, I will
> sync and try again, maybe go to 4.1 and see what happens. I heard 3.19
> was the first version where btrfs actually worked, and I have 3.18 here,
> this is why I was trying the new
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
> > Hi. I am getting some kind of kernel panick in 4.2.1 -- it boots up OK,
> > ...
> > how
> > do I get any information about what happened -- serial console or other
> > means? Can I do a console over the network without additiona
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
> Hi. I am getting some kind of kernel panick in 4.2.1 -- it boots up OK,
> ...
> how
> do I get any information about what happened -- serial console or other
> means? Can I do a console over the network without additional hardware?
That is pretty simple
Hi. I am getting some kind of kernel panick in 4.2.1 -- it boots up OK,
to a virtual console with a framebuffer, but after half a minute or so,
I get the kernel panick -- now nothing is preserved in the logs, so how
do I get any information about what happened -- serial console or other
means? Ca
13 matches
Mail list logo
