On Sat, 04 Feb 18:18:02 -0700
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I've tried to keep the asterisk-1.8.28.2 but the ebuild from "atic"
wouldn't even manifest. There was some security patch missing preventing
it from making manifest.
So more work for me upgrading to 11-ver.
Okay, I see your point.
May
On Sat, 04 Feb 09:00:55 -0500
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
He needs to rebuild the package to get rid of the old library so he
needs the old ebuild and mask newer versions.
I assumed that the OP just wanted to hold the status quo of that package
for a while and no kind of rebuilds. But otherwise
On 02/04/2017 07:00 AM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 07:12:01AM +0100, Floyd Anderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 Feb 18:34:22 -0700
>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> I have an old version of asterisk-1.8.28.2 (it is no longer in portage).
>>> I want to keep this version, tempora
On 02/04/2017 06:25 AM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 05:38:59PM -0800, Daniel Frey wrote:
>> On 02/03/2017 05:34 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> I have an old version of asterisk-1.8.28.2 (it is no longer in portage).
>>> I want to keep this version, temporarily (till I
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 05:38:59PM -0800, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 02/03/2017 05:34 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > I have an old version of asterisk-1.8.28.2 (it is no longer in portage).
> > I want to keep this version, temporarily (till I have a chance to test a
> > new one 11.25.1-ver.
> >
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 07:12:01AM +0100, Floyd Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 18:34:22 -0700
> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> >I have an old version of asterisk-1.8.28.2 (it is no longer in portage).
> >I want to keep this version, temporarily (till I have a chance to test a
> >new one 11.25.1-
On Sat, 04 Feb 10:28:00 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 07:12:01 +0100, Floyd Anderson wrote:
>I have an old version of asterisk-1.8.28.2 (it is no longer in
>portage). I want to keep this version, temporarily (till I have a
>chance to test a new one 11.25.1-ver.
If you have the
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 07:12:01 +0100, Floyd Anderson wrote:
> >I have an old version of asterisk-1.8.28.2 (it is no longer in
> >portage). I want to keep this version, temporarily (till I have a
> >chance to test a new one 11.25.1-ver.
>
> If you have the asterisk-ebuild (and all related files) st
On Fri, 03 Feb 18:34:22 -0700
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I have an old version of asterisk-1.8.28.2 (it is no longer in portage).
I want to keep this version, temporarily (till I have a chance to test a
new one 11.25.1-ver.
If you have the asterisk-ebuild (and all related files) still availa
On 02/03/2017 05:34 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I have an old version of asterisk-1.8.28.2 (it is no longer in portage).
> I want to keep this version, temporarily (till I have a chance to test a
> new one 11.25.1-ver.
>
> I've removed (commented out) "net-misc/asterisk" from world file.
>
I have an old version of asterisk-1.8.28.2 (it is no longer in portage).
I want to keep this version, temporarily (till I have a chance to test a
new one 11.25.1-ver.
I've removed (commented out) "net-misc/asterisk" from world file.
But "emerge -a @preserved-rebuild" still wants to pull:
net-misc
11 matches
Mail list logo
