> Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
> > Well, I have an old GeForce2 MX400 and I'm using 1.0.8178-r3 with GLX,
> > though only with X.org6.8
> >
> > But 1.0.8178 works much better than the older ones. 6629 never worked
> > for me - the oldest I can use (with GLX) are the 1.0.7174.
It's true. It seems 8
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 00:01 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
> > Well, I have an old GeForce2 MX400 and I'm using 1.0.8178-r3 with GLX,
> > though only with X.org6.8
> >
> > But 1.0.8178 works much better than the older ones. 6629 never worked
> > for me - the oldest I ca
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
> Well, I have an old GeForce2 MX400 and I'm using 1.0.8178-r3 with GLX,
> though only with X.org6.8
>
> But 1.0.8178 works much better than the older ones. 6629 never worked
> for me - the oldest I can use (with GLX) are the 1.0.7174.
Hm. Just out of curiosity. What k
On 3/28/06, Chad Feller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got an old nVida card:
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV6 [Vanta/Vanta
> LT] (rev 15)
>
> and am using the 7174. GLX, DRI it all works well. I've been putting
> off upgrading to modular X on this box until I k
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:10:33 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Why do you want to use such an old version? I have it working with
1.0.7174, the last that works with the TNT2 card in this box.
With GLX enabled?
I think so, but I don't have access to that box rig
Norberto Bensa wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Nope, I'm running pure ~amd64, so I am using the 8xxx line of drivers.
They seem fine to me; have you tried upgrading? Or, perhaps you are using
an old video card?
Old one. GeForce 2 MX (NV10 IIRC)
I guess I'll have to buy a new one...
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:10:33 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> > Why do you want to use such an old version? I have it working with
> > 1.0.7174, the last that works with the TNT2 card in this box.
>
> With GLX enabled?
I think so, but I don't have access to that box right now.
--
Neil Bothwick
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Nope, I'm running pure ~amd64, so I am using the 8xxx line of drivers.
> They seem fine to me; have you tried upgrading? Or, perhaps you are using
> an old video card?
Old one. GeForce 2 MX (NV10 IIRC)
I guess I'll have to buy a new one...
Regards,
Norberto
pg
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 01:55:03 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> > Has anyone tried Xorg7 with nvidia 1.0.6629?
>
> Why do you want to use such an old version? I have it working with
> 1.0.7174, the last that works with the TNT2 card in this box.
With GLX enabled?
Regards,
Norbe
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 01:55:03 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Has anyone tried Xorg7 with nvidia 1.0.6629?
Why do you want to use such an old version? I have it working with
1.0.7174, the last that works with the TNT2 card in this box.
--
Neil Bothwick
If all the world is a stage, where is the
On Monday 27 March 2006 22:55, Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] nvidia 6629? was: modular Xorg made it to ~x86':
> Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > I need a functional X on this box, but
> > I'm happy to put up with a few quirks. What ar
Iain Buchanan wrote:
> I need a functional X on this box, but
> I'm happy to put up with a few quirks. What are the gotcha's?
I'll hijack this one.
Has anyone tried Xorg7 with nvidia 1.0.6629?
Thanks in advance,
Norberto
pgpU70ZqhRUkw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
