Am Sonntag, 10. Dezember 2017, 13:36:19 CET schrieb Kent Fredric:
> as a sort
> of bodge to compensate for the fact portage has no working "provides"
> feature
I'd just like to point out that, to the best of my knowledge, portage actually
switched *from* a "provides" model *to* the virtual system
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 07:36:19 -0500,
Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 02:17:09 -0500
> John Covici wrote:
>
> > OK, thanks, I think I will try that.
>
> The problem you're facing is that you masked dev-lang/perl, but not any
> virtual/perl-* or perl-core/-* to compensate.
>
>
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 08:13:09 -0500,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2017 14:54, John Covici wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 07:36:19 -0500,
> > Kent Fredric wrote:
> >>
> >> [1 ]
> >> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 02:17:09 -0500
> >> John Covici wrote:
> >>
> >>> OK, thanks, I think I will try that.
> >>
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 07:54:59 -0500
John Covici wrote:
> I am using ~amd64 and have done so for
> years, so I don't think I need to maks off anything.
Sorry, I may have gotten my wires crossed.
The impression I got was you were trying to stick with perl 5.24
The point is *if* you're sticking w
On 10/12/2017 14:54, John Covici wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 07:36:19 -0500,
> Kent Fredric wrote:
>>
>> [1 ]
>> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 02:17:09 -0500
>> John Covici wrote:
>>
>>> OK, thanks, I think I will try that.
>>
>> The problem you're facing is that you masked dev-lang/perl, but not any
>> v
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 07:36:19 -0500,
Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 02:17:09 -0500
> John Covici wrote:
>
> > OK, thanks, I think I will try that.
>
> The problem you're facing is that you masked dev-lang/perl, but not any
> virtual/perl-* or perl-core/-* to compensate.
>
>
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 02:17:09 -0500
John Covici wrote:
> OK, thanks, I think I will try that.
The problem you're facing is that you masked dev-lang/perl, but not any
virtual/perl-* or perl-core/-* to compensate.
These 3 components work in concert like a single component, as a sort
of bodge to co
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 18:20:40 -0500,
Daniel Frey wrote:
>
> On 12/09/17 08:18, John Covici wrote:
> > On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:28:25 -0500,
> > Daniel Frey wrote:
> >>
> >> I had a lot of problems with the perl updates as well, and could
> >> not get it to resolve. I wasted over an hour trying to re
On Saturday, 9 December 2017 23:20:40 GMT Daniel Frey wrote:
> I was trying to get the dependencies resolved so I could run
> `emerge - auDNe world ...
Really? Specifying -e overrules -uDN and makes them superfluous. Why would
you want to do that?
--
Regards,
Peter.
On 12/09/17 08:18, John Covici wrote:
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:28:25 -0500,
Daniel Frey wrote:
I had a lot of problems with the perl updates as well, and could
not get it to resolve. I wasted over an hour trying to resolve it
(my poor Celeron would take 5-10 minutes trying to calculate
dependenci
On 09/12/2017 17:28, Daniel Frey wrote:
>> hmmm, nothing masked as far as perl modules, I will look at
>> verbose-conflicts and maybe write down all those modules and start
>> unmerging and see if eventually portage can figure out something -- I
>> don't really want to do that, however I will lo
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:28:25 -0500,
Daniel Frey wrote:
>
> On 12/09/17 03:23, John Covici wrote:
> > On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:51:03 -0500,
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/12/2017 21:12, John Covici wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:42:16 -0500,
> >>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> O
On 12/09/17 03:23, John Covici wrote:
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:51:03 -0500,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 08/12/2017 21:12, John Covici wrote:
On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:42:16 -0500,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 07/12/2017 17:46, John Covici wrote:
On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:37:56 -0500,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:51:03 -0500,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> On 08/12/2017 21:12, John Covici wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:42:16 -0500,
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07/12/2017 17:46, John Covici wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:37:56 -0500,
> >>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>
On 08/12/2017 21:12, John Covici wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:42:16 -0500,
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> On 07/12/2017 17:46, John Covici wrote:
>>> On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:37:56 -0500,
>>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 07/12/2017 07:44, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. In preparing for the profil
On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:42:16 -0500,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> On 07/12/2017 17:46, John Covici wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:37:56 -0500,
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07/12/2017 07:44, John Covici wrote:
> >>> Hi. In preparing for the profile switch and the emerge -e world, I
> >>> hav
On 07/12/2017 17:46, John Covici wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:37:56 -0500,
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> On 07/12/2017 07:44, John Covici wrote:
>>> Hi. In preparing for the profile switch and the emerge -e world, I
>>> have run into a serious problem with perl. I think I saw on this list
>>> wh
On 12/07/2017 09:04 AM, John Covici wrote:
>
> I have it set to 120 by default.
>
Um... try "emerge -uDN1 perl" instead of @world? The perl
upgrade was tough, IIRC because it needed a large backtrack value to
succeed. But back when the perl upgrade was "new", a @world update was
simple e
On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:37:56 -0500,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> On 07/12/2017 07:44, John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. In preparing for the profile switch and the emerge -e world, I
> > have run into a serious problem with perl. I think I saw on this list
> > where perl 5.26 was going to have problems -- m
On 07/12/2017 07:44, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. In preparing for the profile switch and the emerge -e world, I
> have run into a serious problem with perl. I think I saw on this list
> where perl 5.26 was going to have problems -- maybe until it is
> stabilized -- but if I mask it off, I get the fo
On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 07:42:45 -0500,
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On 12/07/2017 12:44 AM, John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. In preparing for the profile switch and the emerge -e world, I
> > have run into a serious problem with perl. I think I saw on this list
> > where perl 5.26 was going to have problem
On 12/07/2017 12:44 AM, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. In preparing for the profile switch and the emerge -e world, I
> have run into a serious problem with perl. I think I saw on this list
> where perl 5.26 was going to have problems -- maybe until it is
> stabilized -- but if I mask it off, I get the
Hi. In preparing for the profile switch and the emerge -e world, I
have run into a serious problem with perl. I think I saw on this list
where perl 5.26 was going to have problems -- maybe until it is
stabilized -- but if I mask it off, I get the following:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=d
23 matches
Mail list logo