On Tuesday 08 Dec 2015 03:29:45 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Stroller
wrote:
> > That's like telling your grandma, "you don't know what DNS is? this is
> > internet 101 - you use DNS all the time".
> >
> > I have not needed to add directories to CONFIG_PROTECT, or alter
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Stroller wrote:
>
> That's like telling your grandma, "you don't know what DNS is? this is
> internet 101 - you use DNS all the time".
>
> I have not needed to add directories to CONFIG_PROTECT, or alter it in any
> way, in over 10 years of using Gentoo.
>
Fair e
> On Tue, 8 December 2015, at 12:29 a.m., Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> It seems just a tad exotic to me, as I haven't used or needed it in over 10
>> years.
>
> You never run etc-update or dispatch-conf? If you do, you're using
> it. You're just using its default configuration and not adding
>
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Stroller wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 7 December 2015, at 9:24 p.m., Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> It wasn't really targeted at anybody in particular. It just should be
>> clear in the documentation since config protection and merging config
>> changes is a big part of adminis
> On Mon, 7 December 2015, at 9:24 p.m., Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> It wasn't really targeted at anybody in particular. It just should be
> clear in the documentation since config protection and merging config
> changes is a big part of administering a Gentoo system. It probably
> should be in th
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Stroller wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 6 December 2015, at 6:49 p.m., Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> If somebody has a link to the docs for this please post it, as it
>> seems like this has disappeared from the handbook. This used to be
>> Gentoo 101…
>
> That seems like a somew
> On Sun, 6 December 2015, at 6:49 p.m., Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> If somebody has a link to the docs for this please post it, as it
> seems like this has disappeared from the handbook. This used to be
> Gentoo 101…
That seems like a somewhat dubious statement, if it wasn't just intended to be
On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 13:49:15 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Ok, so you're saying that putting the CONFIG_PROTECT in make.conf,
> > makes the directory read-only only for portage, right?
> Nope. It just enabled configuration protection, as is the default
> for /etc.
>
> So changes go into new fil
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Stroller
wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 4 December 2015, at 12:55 p.m., Rich Freeman
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Surely it should go in somewhere like /usr/local/share/X11/xkb/symbols/
>>> instead.
>>>
>>> Making the original /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ directory read-only
>>> prev
> On Fri, 4 December 2015, at 4:13 p.m., gevisz wrote:
>>
>> Surely it should go in somewhere like /usr/local/share/X11/xkb/symbols/
>> instead.
>
> I do not have /usr/local/share directory at all. Do you think it is wrong?
Local directories are ones which you can create to put system stuff i
> On Fri, 4 December 2015, at 12:55 p.m., Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> Surely it should go in somewhere like /usr/local/share/X11/xkb/symbols/
>> instead.
>>
>> Making the original /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ directory read-only prevents
>> updates and bug fixes being applied.
>>
>
> Nobody su
On Friday 04 December 2015 12:38:16 Stroller wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 December 2015, at 12:10 p.m., Peter Humphrey
> > wrote:>
> > On Friday 04 December 2015 13:55:30 gevisz wrote:
> >> So, my main question is How can I ensure that the already
> >> edited /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ru file will not b
2015-12-04 14:38 GMT+02:00 Stroller :
>
>> On Fri, 4 December 2015, at 12:10 p.m., Peter Humphrey
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Friday 04 December 2015 13:55:30 gevisz wrote:
>>
>>> So, my main question is How can I ensure that the already
>>> edited /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ru file will not be overwritte
2015-12-04 14:10 GMT+02:00 Peter Humphrey :
> On Friday 04 December 2015 13:55:30 gevisz wrote:
>
>> So, my main question is How can I ensure that the already
>> edited /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ru file will not be overwritten
>> during the next system update.
>
> Add it to CONFIG_PROTECT in make.
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 01:55:30PM +0200, gevisz wrote:
>
> So, my main question is How can I ensure that the already
> edited /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ru file will not be overwritten
> during the next system update. Thabk you.
>
Use a configuration management tool like puppet or ansible. It w
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Stroller wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 4 December 2015, at 12:10 p.m., Peter Humphrey
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Friday 04 December 2015 13:55:30 gevisz wrote:
>>
>>> So, my main question is How can I ensure that the already
>>> edited /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ru file will not be
> On Fri, 4 December 2015, at 12:10 p.m., Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
>
> On Friday 04 December 2015 13:55:30 gevisz wrote:
>
>> So, my main question is How can I ensure that the already
>> edited /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ru file will not be overwritten
>> during the next system update.
>
> Add
On Friday 04 December 2015 13:55:30 gevisz wrote:
> So, my main question is How can I ensure that the already
> edited /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ru file will not be overwritten
> during the next system update.
Add it to CONFIG_PROTECT in make.conf.
--
Rgds
Peter
Recently, I finally created my own keyboard layout by edining
/usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/ru file.
In the nearest future, I also will edit the corresponding xml file
that provides the menu for the xfce4 keyboard layout switch
plugin file deleting from it all the entries about keyboard layouts
for th
19 matches
Mail list logo