There has long been talk of deprecating etcat and qpkg in favor of
equery, has that been finalized? I updated to portage-2.0.51.21-r1
yesterday and can no longer find the etcat and qpkg commands.
And what is it with the changelogs? Maybe I've looked in the wrong
place, but I didn't see that
On Monday 09 May 2005 16:33, Willie Wong wrote:
There has long been talk of deprecating etcat and qpkg in favor of
equery, has that been finalized? I updated to portage-2.0.51.21-r1
yesterday and can no longer find the etcat and qpkg commands.
And what is it with the changelogs? Maybe I've
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 00:33, Willie Wong wrote:
There has long been talk of deprecating etcat and qpkg in favor of
equery, has that been finalized? I updated to portage-2.0.51.21-r1
yesterday and can no longer find the etcat and qpkg commands.
And what is it with the changelogs? Maybe I've
On Mon, 09 May 2005 18:50:45 +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote:
* The qpkg and etcat tools are deprecated in favor of equery and
* are no longer installed in /usr/bin in this release.
* They are still available in
/usr/share/doc/gentoolkit-0.2.1_pre2/deprecated/
* if you *really* want to use
Agreement.
equery size somepackage
is much, much slower than:
pkg-size somepackage
I don't know if equery can be significantly sped up in the future,
but the speed difference is a significant problem for me. With 550 MHz,
pkg-size (a relatively simple shell script) was almost instantaneous,
5 matches
Mail list logo
