Re: [gentoo-user] rc-update add hald default or boot?

2009-04-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:43:47 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: Thanks for the responses guys. I've always had it at default also. I was just wondering. The elog message states it should be in default. Now, does hald need dbus? Require dbus? Interesting. I have dbus installed but it's not running

[gentoo-user] rc-update add hald default or boot?

2009-04-13 Thread Mark Knecht
Hi, I've wondered for a while whether the design intention of hald was to be run at boot time or as a default level process? Googling for 'rc-update add hald default' turns up more responses than it does for boot, but they are both out there. Seems like if you wanted to recognize hardware it

Re: [gentoo-user] rc-update add hald default or boot?

2009-04-13 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've wondered for a while whether the design intention of hald was to be run at boot time or as a default level process? I have had mine at default forever and it seems to work fine.

Re: [gentoo-user] rc-update add hald default or boot?

2009-04-13 Thread Mike Edenfield
Mark Knecht wrote: Hi, I've wondered for a while whether the design intention of hald was to be run at boot time or as a default level process? Googling for It's intended that you'll be running it at the default level. Hal requires D-BUS, which means it needs to be run at the earliest

Re: [gentoo-user] rc-update add hald default or boot?

2009-04-13 Thread Mark Knecht
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Mike Edenfield kut...@kutulu.org wrote: Mark Knecht wrote: Hi,   I've wondered for a while whether the design intention of hald was to be run at boot time or as a default level process? Googling for It's intended that you'll be running it at the default