hi:
I upgraded rxvt-unicode within just one or two days, right after a
upgrade to version 9.09,
it does not support transparency any more, but my Xresources had been always
working for me.
post a snippet of my config file here, thanks.
URxvt.transparent:true
URxvt.shading:20
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:58:01PM +0800, fei huang wrote:
I upgraded rxvt-unicode within just one or two days, right after a
upgrade to version 9.09,
it does not support transparency any more, but my Xresources had been always
working for me.
post a snippet of my config file here,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Willie Wong ww...@math.princeton.eduwrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:58:01PM +0800, fei huang wrote:
I upgraded rxvt-unicode within just one or two days, right after a
upgrade to version 9.09,
it does not support transparency any more, but my
ok, everything is back to normal again, I downgraded my rxvt-unicode to
9.07-r2 and it worked as before. shall I report a bug or maybe I still
missed something?
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:11 AM, fei huang daniel.huang...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Willie Wong
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:36:01AM +0800, fei huang wrote:
ok, everything is back to normal again, I downgraded my rxvt-unicode to
9.07-r2 and it worked as before. shall I report a bug or maybe I still
missed something?
Go ahead and file a bug, but as pseudotransparency was never
officially
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:04:10AM -0800, Keith Dart wrote:
I had previously used method 3, with an entry in my ~/.Xdefaults for
it, that worked fine. It stopped for some reason with this new version.
I suspect they may have removed the hacks they talked about and now
depend on a properly
=== On Sat, 11/20, Willie Wong wrote: ===
If that were indeed the case (that they are forcing migration away
from pseudotransparency and into real transparency), then it'd have
been nice if the +/-tr tags throw some error text rather than just
being silently ignored.
===
I did some
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Keith Dart ke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
=== On Sat, 11/20, Willie Wong wrote: ===
If that were indeed the case (that they are forcing migration away
from pseudotransparency and into real transparency), then it'd have
been nice if the +/-tr tags throw some
8 matches
Mail list logo
