Re: [gentoo-user] sed changing behavior

2005-05-27 Thread Antonio Souto
On 5/27/05, darren kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My version I tested with is also 4.1.4I just can't see this being the fault of sed here, for one to work and not theother just doesn't make sense.Have you diffed the two different tcupdate scripts to be sure they are exactly the same? What about o

Re: [gentoo-user] sed changing behavior

2005-05-27 Thread darren kirby
quoth the Antonio Souto: > Hi Darren > > On 5/26/05, darren kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was playing around with this, and it seems to be working fine for me. > > Are > > you using two different versions of sed? Any major differences between > > the two systems? Identical scripts? > > The

Re: [gentoo-user] sed changing behavior

2005-05-27 Thread Antonio Souto
Hi Darren On 5/26/05, darren kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was playing around with this, and it seems to be working fine for me. Areyou using two different versions of sed? Any major differences between thetwo systems? Identical scripts? The useflags are the same on both systems: # emerge -

Re: [gentoo-user] sed changing behavior

2005-05-26 Thread darren kirby
quoth the Antonio Souto: > I am having a strange problem: every time I try to run the script tcupdate > ( http://gentooexperimental.org/archive/tcupdate/tcupdate-0.2.2.0) > I get the error: > > sed: -e expression #1, char 127: unterminated `s' command > > It works ok at my lab, but not on my PC at

[gentoo-user] sed changing behavior

2005-05-26 Thread Antonio Souto
I am having a strange problem: every time I try to run the script tcupdate (http://gentooexperimental.org/archive/tcupdate/tcupdate-0.2.2.0) I get the error: sed: -e _expression_ #1, char 127: unterminated `s' command It works ok at my lab, but not on my PC at home! I have already reemerged s