Re: [gentoo-user] smartctl strangeness

2007-10-26 Thread Eric Martin
On 10/26/07, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Since you didn't specify how you determined that it > > has only 131G, > > perhaps you should check with fdisk to see what the > > actual capacity > > is? > > > > The BIOS has 131G for the Samsung in a sub-menu for > that drive: Maximum Cap

RE: [gentoo-user] smartctl strangeness

2007-10-25 Thread Adam Carter
> The BIOS has 131G for the Samsung in a sub-menu for > that drive: Maximum Capacity [131071MB], fdisk sees > the whole 160G. In that case I'd look for a BIOS update. (FWIW 128 x 1024 = 131072). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] smartctl strangeness

2007-10-25 Thread maxim wexler
> Since you didn't specify how you determined that it > has only 131G, > perhaps you should check with fdisk to see what the > actual capacity > is? > The BIOS has 131G for the Samsung in a sub-menu for that drive: Maximum Capacity [131071MB], fdisk sees the whole 160G. On my way to check the c

RE: [gentoo-user] smartctl strangeness

2007-10-25 Thread Adam Carter
> Anyway, this is where things get even stranger. I've > quadruple-checked and I still don't believe it. The > Maxtor drive now PASSES smartctl -H and the "new" one > FAILS. The Maxtor still gets the dma_intr errors in > dmesg and the Samsung is said to have it's "DMA > disabled" which contradicts

[gentoo-user] smartctl strangeness

2007-10-25 Thread maxim wexler
Hi group, A while ago my Maxtor 120G IDE HD started acting up, smartctl wouldn't pass it and in dmesg were many ominous dma_intr errors. So from ebay I got a used Samsung 160g which I just installed. I was hoping to transfer over my OS and files etc to the "new" drive. The drive is recognized i