* Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
I've just emerge'd inetd, and this installed xinetd.
How can I get inetd installed ?
pago helped me quite a lot in finding the correct
package really fast. Just have a look at
* Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/21/06, Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
inetd is way too old. I tried googling for it, and I couldn't even
find source downloads for it.
Just to complement it, inetd _can_ be found in portage, in package
sys-apps/netkit-base
The name is
* Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
anyway, why use old inetd at all? xinetd is way more powerful and secure!
well, I've already been using it for over 10 years, I never had
serious problems with it, and has all
On 6/28/06, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
anyway, why use old inetd at all? xinetd is way more powerful and secure!
well, I've already been using it for over 10
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:33:22 +0200
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
anyway, why use old inetd at all? xinetd is way more powerful and secure!
well, I've already been using it
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:16:37 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
Modern in the computer world = more efficient, robust, better support,
continue developing, more features, less security holes.
As in Vista is more modern than XP is more modern than Win98? :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Windows
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Ah. Interesting argument.
Because it's quite modern (for the kids) to wear overwide pants,
there's no need to produce tight ones anylonger ?
Great.
It's more along the lines of inetd being utter crap compared to xinetd.
What next, complaining that NCSA httpd isn't in
Hi folks,
I've just emerge'd inetd, and this installed xinetd.
How can I get inetd installed ?
cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
hiya
I've just emerge'd inetd, and this installed xinetd.
How can I get inetd installed ?
compile frm source, or get an outside-portage ebuild.
google for inetd ebuild, for example.
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman
On 6/21/06, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just emerge'd inetd, and this installed xinetd.
How can I get inetd installed ?
inetd is a virtual package that is provided by xinetd now.
anyway, why use old inetd at all? xinetd is way more powerful and secure!
--
Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 14:18, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just emerge'd inetd, and this installed xinetd.
How can I get inetd installed ?
Well, if you *really* want it [1]. I do agree with the others. You should just
use xinitd as it is superior to inetd.
[1]
* Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
anyway, why use old inetd at all? xinetd is way more powerful and secure!
well, I've already been using it for over 10 years, I never had
serious problems with it, and has all I need.
So why should I now switch to xinetd ?
Wouldn't it make more
On 6/21/06, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, I've already been using it for over 10 years, I never had
serious problems with it, and has all I need.
So why should I now switch to xinetd ?
The answer to this 'why' can be found here:
http://www.xinetd.org/faq.html#why
Wouldn't it
On 6/21/06, Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
inetd is way too old. I tried googling for it, and I couldn't even
find source downloads for it.
Just to complement it, inetd _can_ be found in portage, in package
sys-apps/netkit-base
--
Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
anyway, why use old inetd at all? xinetd is way more powerful and secure!
well, I've already been using it for over 10 years, I never had
serious problems with it, and has all I need.
So why should I now switch to xinetd ?
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Bruno Lustosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
anyway, why use old inetd at all? xinetd is way more powerful and secure!
well, I've already been using it for over 10 years, I never had
serious problems with it, and has all I need.
So why should I now switch to xinetd ?
16 matches
Mail list logo