Re: [gentoo-user] xdirectfb on 2005 - no binary after compilation - any tips to get xdirectfb working

2005-06-30 Thread anthony hornby
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 09:31 -0400, Matthew Cline wrote: On 6/29/05, anthony hornby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone have any tips on getting XdirectFB working on gentoo 2005? There's also a lengthy post in the forums about it:

Re: [gentoo-user] xdirectfb on 2005 - no binary after compilation - any tips to get xdirectfb working

2005-06-30 Thread anthony hornby
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 18:49 +0900, Steve B wrote: On 6/29/05, anthony hornby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a Matrox G550 dual head graphics card and I want to have DirectFB running on one head for VDR output http://www.cadsoft.de/vdr/ using softdevice, and the other head running

Re: [gentoo-user] xdirectfb on 2005 - no binary after compilation - any tips to get xdirectfb working

2005-06-29 Thread Steve B
On 6/29/05, anthony hornby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a Matrox G550 dual head graphics card and I want to have DirectFB running on one head for VDR output http://www.cadsoft.de/vdr/ using softdevice, and the other head running XDirectFB so I have a local graphical desktop. The

[gentoo-user] xdirectfb on 2005 - no binary after compilation - any tips to get xdirectfb working

2005-06-28 Thread anthony hornby
Hi, I have a Matrox G550 dual head graphics card and I want to have DirectFB running on one head for VDR output http://www.cadsoft.de/vdr/ using softdevice, and the other head running XDirectFB so I have a local graphical desktop. The latest ebuild for xdirectfb is broken the compile runs but