Alan McKinnon a gentiment tapote:
> On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:30, Martins wrote:
>
>>> I'm having the same problems. ati-drivers insists on using
>>> X.org-7.1.0.0 or earlier, obviously because the drivers were
>>> compiled against that version.
>>>
>>> I don't have the ati-drivers source c
On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:30, Martins wrote:
> > I'm having the same problems. ati-drivers insists on using
> > X.org-7.1.0.0 or earlier, obviously because the drivers were
> > compiled against that version.
> >
> > I don't have the ati-drivers source code so I can't tell if there
> > was an A
>
> I'm having the same problems. ati-drivers insists on using X.org-7.1.0.0
> or earlier, obviously because the drivers were compiled against that
> version.
>
> I don't have the ati-drivers source code so I can't tell if there was an
> ABI change that the driver enforces, or if ATI simply hardcod
On Friday 26 January 2007 17:57, Martins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After updating to latest unstable xorg-server and ati-drivers I'm hit
> again with incompatible driver versions. Shouldnt be there BIG
> warning for those who have fglrx in make.conf?
>
> Looking into Xorg.log i see that xorg-server-1.2 belo
Hi,
After updating to latest unstable xorg-server and ati-drivers I'm hit again
with incompatible driver versions. Shouldnt be there BIG warning for those
who have fglrx in make.conf?
Looking into Xorg.log i see that xorg-server-1.2 belongs to Xorg-7.2 however I
have masked it, is it dependenc
5 matches
Mail list logo