Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server and ati-drivers 'bussiness'

2007-01-29 Thread Jacques Montier
Alan McKinnon a gentiment tapote: > On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:30, Martins wrote: > >>> I'm having the same problems. ati-drivers insists on using >>> X.org-7.1.0.0 or earlier, obviously because the drivers were >>> compiled against that version. >>> >>> I don't have the ati-drivers source c

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server and ati-drivers 'bussiness'

2007-01-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:30, Martins wrote: > > I'm having the same problems. ati-drivers insists on using > > X.org-7.1.0.0 or earlier, obviously because the drivers were > > compiled against that version. > > > > I don't have the ati-drivers source code so I can't tell if there > > was an A

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server and ati-drivers 'bussiness'

2007-01-27 Thread Martins
> > I'm having the same problems. ati-drivers insists on using X.org-7.1.0.0 > or earlier, obviously because the drivers were compiled against that > version. > > I don't have the ati-drivers source code so I can't tell if there was an > ABI change that the driver enforces, or if ATI simply hardcod

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server and ati-drivers 'bussiness'

2007-01-26 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 26 January 2007 17:57, Martins wrote: > Hi, > > After updating to latest unstable xorg-server and ati-drivers I'm hit > again with incompatible driver versions. Shouldnt be there BIG > warning for those who have fglrx in make.conf? > > Looking into Xorg.log i see that xorg-server-1.2 belo

[gentoo-user] xorg-server and ati-drivers 'bussiness'

2007-01-26 Thread Martins
Hi, After updating to latest unstable xorg-server and ati-drivers I'm hit again with incompatible driver versions. Shouldnt be there BIG warning for those who have fglrx in make.conf? Looking into Xorg.log i see that xorg-server-1.2 belongs to Xorg-7.2 however I have masked it, is it dependenc