Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with dbus

On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 06:55:22 -0800, Douglas Linford wrote: > cd /root > rm -rf .revdep* > revdep-rebuild "revdep-rebuild -i" is easier :) -- Neil Bothwick Fasten your seatbelt ... I wanna try something. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with dbus

> -Original Message- > From: Statux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26 January 2007 03:48 > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with dbus > > update-eix fixed the one issue. I don't usually run > update-eix (thoug

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with dbus

I had the same issue with my Gnome install after a world/dbus update. I found the following fix on Gentoo Forums...his complete message and fix is listed below...thanks to tSp. This fixed my system without having to rebuild my Gnome. I ran into a problem after an emerge upgrade to system and worl

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with dbus

Reordered for readability... On Friday 26 January 2007 04:48, Statux wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 19:05 -0600, »Q« wrote: > > I think you need update-eix. dbus-1.0.2 has been stable on x86 since > > 21 January. > > update-eix fixed the one issue. I don't usually run update-eix (though I > did r

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with dbus

revdep-rebuild was run immediately after but gnome-session failed to link with any other version of dbus. I even removed gnome-session and manually checked for loose copies on the system but found nothing. I reinstalled it and it still wasn't happy. update-eix fixed the one issue. I don't usually

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems with dbus

»Q« wrote: > In , > Statux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Oddly, I noticed (via eix) that dbus-1.0.2 was still ~x86 masked but >> emerge swore that it was what the rest of the system wanted but >> nothing else, that I've found, seems to have required it. I'm >> guessin