Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-18 Thread Ryan Tandy
Sigi Schwartz wrote: So, how do I make new (testing-)settings apply without reboot? /etc/init.d/net.eth0 restart and wait a few seconds for your resolv.conf to be updated. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-18 Thread Sigi Schwartz
Hi. Ryan Tandy wrote: > the command should be: dnsdomainname (or hostname -d) Now, I have a question to that: How or when do new settings apply? Even though I use DHCP I understand that one can override the results from that. For testing purposes I'd like to use that. But I can change the setting

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Ryan Tandy
Mick wrote: I saw this: # dns_domain_eth0="your.domain" in the /etc/conf.d/net.example and added: dns_domain="STUDY" but still .none comes up: # domainname (none) the command should be: dnsdomainname (or hostname -d) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/17/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am not sure if this is related or not, but for some reason, my resolv.conf keeps getting modified, causing samba to fail. I open it and all that is in there is the domain, no name servers. The reason is noted in net.example: # Setting

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Timothy A. Holmes
> > >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > >> > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting a > > >> > > systemwide domain name in favor of doing it per interface! > > >> > > > >> > True. And that's probably why you don't *have* to set it per > > >> > i

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On 9/17/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 17 September 2006 13:43, Alexander Skwar wrote: > · Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> > > It makes very little sense to di

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation?

2006-09-17 Thread Mick
On Sunday 17 September 2006 13:43, Alexander Skwar wrote: > · Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:50:28 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> > > It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting a > >> > > system