Just to close this all up on a funny note, look at this:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Recover_from_%22emerge_--unmerge_gcc%22#.22I_Did_This.22_Wall_of_Shame
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:42:29 -0500, Teresa and Dale wrote:
From what I understand, which may be as wrong as it gets, if I use the
buildpkg thing, it stores a binary in /usr/portage/packages/All/ and if
I really screw up something, like portage, gcc or something like that, I
can untar it to /
Hi,
Lord Sauron wrote:
On 5/31/06, Rumen Yotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I keep binaries for all major/critical packages of my system - gcc,glibc
But their usage depends on processor family, USE flags for gcc etc.
Will put a binary tarball of gcc-3.4.6-r1 (gcc-3.4.6-r1.tbz2)-25MB.
Justin R Findlay wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:23:48PM -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
So I'm just going to untar it to / by tar xjvf gcc-3.4.5-r1.tbz2?
No.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # cp gcc-3.4.5-r1.tbz2 /usr/portage/packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # emerge -k =gcc-3.4.5-r1
And make sure PKGDIR is
Le mercredi 31 mai 2006 à 16:28 -0700, Lord Sauron a écrit :
For reasons that I can't fathom, gcc, is now gone. Totally.
Completely. Not there.
there is a page in the wiki explaining how to solve this :
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Recover_from_%22emerge_--unmerge_gcc%22
-Leszek
--
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 22:23 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
I should be
able to say whether your steps worked within an hour or so. Thanks
again.
*meep*
no news is good news?
--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
leszek wrote:
Le mercredi 31 mai 2006 à 16:28 -0700, Lord Sauron a écrit :
For reasons that I can't fathom, gcc, is now gone. Totally.
Completely. Not there.
there is a page in the wiki explaining how to solve this :
I fixed it. Thank God that's over... it was good to go back to the
command line a bit for me. Keeps me sharp... even despite the huge
allergies I'm experiencing right now.
I've also added a note in my notes files to NEVER run anything like
emerge --unmerge gcc ever again. That was a huge
Lord Sauron wrote:
I fixed it. Thank God that's over... it was good to go back to the
command line a bit for me. Keeps me sharp... even despite the huge
allergies I'm experiencing right now.
I've also added a note in my notes files to NEVER run anything like
emerge --unmerge gcc ever
On 6/1/06, Teresa and Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently changed mine to this:
# FEATURES are settings that affect the functionality of portage. Most of
# these settings are for developer use, but some are available to non-
# developers as well. 'buildpkg' is an always-on
Lord Sauron wrote:
On 6/1/06, Teresa and Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently changed mine to this:
# FEATURES are settings that affect the functionality of portage.
Most of
# these settings are for developer use, but some are available
to non-
# developers as well.
On 5/31/06, Lord Sauron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there, and other things. To me it looks like Python is totally
broken. It keeps asking for libstdc++.so.6, which apparently no
longer exists.
Yes, on Gentoo unmerging gcc will break all programs that depend on
libstdc++.so. You should have
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:28:45PM -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
This is - for me - an emergency. No pun intended.
I had to get rid of all gcc versions 3.4.5 and greater to work with
gcc in Cygwin on my desktop to speed up the emerge of KDE 3.5 such
that I wouldn't finish when KDE 4.0 was
On Thursday 01 June 2006 00:28, Lord Sauron wrote:
I had to get rid of all gcc versions 3.4.5 and greater to work with
gcc in Cygwin on my desktop to speed up the emerge of KDE 3.5 such
that I wouldn't finish when KDE 4.0 was released.
I gave it some pretty explicit instructions AFTER
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:45 -0700, Alan wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:28:45PM -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
Secondly, you can relatively easily
restore a gcc by creating a binary package from another gentoo server
(I forget the exact steps for this, basically you can dump all the files
On Wed, 31 May 2006 20:46:54 -0300
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On 5/31/06, Lord Sauron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is - for me - an emergency. No pun intended.
I had to get rid of all gcc versions 3.4.5 and greater to work with
gcc in Cygwin on my desktop to speed up the emerge of KDE 3.5
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 13:33 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
Some OK ideas have been floated here, but what if our friend doesn't
have another working gentoo machine? he needs that for quickpkg.
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:28 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
My best idea has been to try and distcc with my
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:19:27 +0930
Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:28 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
My best idea has been to try and distcc with my desktop
I assumed the presence of a separate desktop machine from this comment.
ahh ok missed that bit.
And I think you are
Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:28 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
My best idea has been to try and distcc with my desktop
I assumed the presence of a separate desktop machine from this comment.
His desktop is a Windows machine, running distcc under Cygwin.
--
Lord Sauron wrote:
This is - for me - an emergency. No pun intended.
I had to get rid of all gcc versions 3.4.5 and greater to work with
gcc in Cygwin on my desktop to speed up the emerge of KDE 3.5 such
that I wouldn't finish when KDE 4.0 was released.
I gave it some pretty explicit
On 5/31/06, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:28:45PM -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
This is - for me - an emergency. No pun intended.
I had to get rid of all gcc versions 3.4.5 and greater to work with
gcc in Cygwin on my desktop to speed up the emerge of KDE 3.5 such
On 5/31/06, Rumen Yotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I keep binaries for all major/critical packages of my system - gcc,glibc
But their usage depends on processor family, USE flags for gcc etc.
Will put a binary tarball of gcc-3.4.6-r1 (gcc-3.4.6-r1.tbz2)-25MB.
CFLAGS=-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:23:48PM -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
So I'm just going to untar it to / by tar xjvf gcc-3.4.5-r1.tbz2?
No.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # cp gcc-3.4.5-r1.tbz2 /usr/portage/packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # emerge -k =gcc-3.4.5-r1
And make sure PKGDIR is set to /usr/portage/packages
On 5/31/06, Justin R Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:23:48PM -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
So I'm just going to untar it to / by tar xjvf gcc-3.4.5-r1.tbz2?
No.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # cp gcc-3.4.5-r1.tbz2 /usr/portage/packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # emerge -k =gcc-3.4.5-r1
On 5/31/06, Lord Sauron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/31/06, Justin R Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:23:48PM -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
So I'm just going to untar it to / by tar xjvf gcc-3.4.5-r1.tbz2?
No.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # cp gcc-3.4.5-r1.tbz2
On 5/31/06, Justin R Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:23:48PM -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
So I'm just going to untar it to / by tar xjvf gcc-3.4.5-r1.tbz2?
No.
No:
cd /
tar -xjvf path/gcc-3.4.5-r1.tbz2
Justin, remember the original problem...no libstdc++.so.6, so
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:40:13PM -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
Justin, remember the original problem...no libstdc++.so.6, so all C++
dependant packages are broken, and this includes python and thus
portage.
OK. I guess I should read the whole thread before spouting off
directions. (-:
27 matches
Mail list logo
