On 2/6/20 8:56 PM, John Covici wrote:
I do run my own mail server for years, but I would like to know how to
run those "hygene features". I do have spf, but that is about it --
maybe this should be another thread, but I want to keep doing this
and be sure of having my mail delivered to where
On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 19:00:09 -0500,
Grant Taylor wrote:
>
> On 2/6/20 3:36 PM, Laurence Perkins wrote:
> > Sure you can set up just a simple email server
>
> Having run a personal email server for 20 years, including all
> contemporary hygiene measures, I don't think "simple" and "email
>
On 2/6/20 3:36 PM, Laurence Perkins wrote:
Sure you can set up just a simple email server
Having run a personal email server for 20 years, including all
contemporary hygiene measures, I don't think "simple" and "email server"
go together any more.
I can rattle off most of what I'm doing in
On 2020.02.06 17:36, Laurence Perkins wrote:
On Sat, 2020-02-01 at 17:08 -0500, Jack wrote:
CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
I didn't write that. :-)
>
> Relying on the collective
On Sat, 2020-02-01 at 17:08 -0500, Jack wrote:
> CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Do not click links or open
> attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
> Relying on the collective experience and advice of the group here.
>
> As may be obvious to many of
Mick - thanks for the responses.
[just replying to a few specific points]
On 2020.02.02 06:27, Mick wrote:
On Saturday, 1 February 2020 22:08:37 GMT Jack wrote:
[snip.]
Thanks for the general info on the "alias" issue.One minor problem
I've had is that many email providers say the
On Sat, 01 Feb 2020 17:08:37 -0500
Jack wrote:
> Relying on the collective experience and advice of the group here.
>
> As may be obvious to many of you, the address this message is sent
> from "...@users.sourceforge.net" isn't really a fully functional
> address. Email sent to that address
On 01/02/20 22:08, Jack wrote:
> Relying on the collective experience and advice of the group here.
>
> As may be obvious to many of you, the address this message is sent from
> "...@users.sourceforge.net" isn't really a fully functional address.
> Email sent to that address will be forwarded by
On 2/1/20 5:08 PM, Jack wrote:
Relying on the collective experience and advice of the group here.
As may be obvious to many of you, the address this message is sent from
"...@users.sourceforge.net" isn't really a fully functional address.
Email sent to that address will be forwarded by the
Just to add the headers fail the DMARC checks, as I noticed in Jack's message:
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of gentoo-user+bounces-189351-
michaelkintzios=gmail@lists.gentoo.org designates 208.92.234.80 as
permitted sender)
On Saturday, 1 February 2020 22:08:37 GMT Jack wrote:
> Relying on the collective experience and advice of the group here.
>
> As may be obvious to many of you, the address this message is sent from
> "...@users.sourceforge.net" isn't really a fully functional address.
> Email sent to that
Jack wrote:
> Relying on the collective experience and advice of the group here.
>
> As may be obvious to many of you, the address this message is sent
> from "...@users.sourceforge.net" isn't really a fully functional
> address. Email sent to that address will be forwarded by the
> sourceforge
Jack wrote:
> Relying on the collective experience and advice of the group here.
>
> As may be obvious to many of you, the address this message is sent
> from "...@users.sourceforge.net" isn't really a fully functional
> address. Email sent to that address will be forwarded by the
> sourceforge
13 matches
Mail list logo
