Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On 05/18/2017 11:32 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 05/18/2017 05:06 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: >> On 05/17/2017 03:35 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: >>> >>> It also enables me to finally use UEFI and suspend to RAM again >>> with NVIDIA proprietary without a dead framebuffer after resume. ;-) >> >> I have

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On 05/17/2017 03:35 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > > It also enables me to finally use UEFI and suspend to RAM again > with NVIDIA proprietary without a dead framebuffer after resume. ;-) > I have had this problem for years and thought it was a bad card. Replaced it recently, still have the problem.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Wed, 17 May 2017 12:14:18 -0700 > schrieb Jorge Almeida : >> Well, regardless of how well/badly it works, it does seem to have >> everything I don't want: hidden boot messages? logs sent to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 05/14/2017 01:47 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> >> It's the first time I hear about plymouth. Visiting >> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/plymouth/ I found zilch documentation. > Actually, I replied too soon: there is a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Sun, 14 May 2017 10:11:31 +0100 > schrieb Jorge Almeida : >> >> >> I suppose it's goodbye to Tux, for now. I was hoping someone else >> would be using the same kernel... > > You could setup

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Sun, 14 May 2017 08:32:46 +0100 > schrieb Jorge Almeida : >> >> In case someone is using kernel 4.11: I tried it and everything >> >> seems fine, except that the linux logo on the boot screen (i.e.