ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
ata1.00: cmd c8/00:80:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 65536 in
res 51/84:4f:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error)
ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
ata1: soft resetting link
ata1.00: configured for
On Samstag 29 Mai 2010, Andrea Conti wrote:
ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
ata1.00: cmd c8/00:80:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 65536 in
res 51/84:4f:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus
error)
ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
ata1.00: error: {
Andrea Conti a...@alyf.net [10-05-29 10:08]:
ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
ata1.00: cmd c8/00:80:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 65536 in
res 51/84:4f:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error)
ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
On Saturday 29 May 2010 10:16:39 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Samstag 29 Mai 2010, Andrea Conti wrote:
ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
ata1.00: cmd c8/00:80:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 65536 in
res 51/84:4f:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus
Hi,
I tried these kernels (all vanilla):
2.6.32.13
2.6.33.5
2.6.34.0
So it's not a known problem that has been fixed.
Just a wild guess... can you try recompiling the kernel *without*
pata_via? Some people have reported having problems with sata drives on
VIA controllers when pata_via is
On Samstag 29 Mai 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 29 May 2010 10:16:39 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Samstag 29 Mai 2010, Andrea Conti wrote:
ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
ata1.00: cmd c8/00:80:00:3f:c1/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 65536 in
res
walt w41...@gmail.com [10-05-29 03:21]:
On 05/27/2010 06:54 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
I know nothing about the new large-sector disks, but the line above
makes
me worried that the disk driver doesn't know any more than I do :)
Anyone know if that
On 27 May 2010, at 01:19, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
...
Is there any way to check the disk without damaging its
contents?
If you have copied from /dev/sda to /dev/sdb then `md5sum /dev/sda /
dev/sdb` will compare both drives. You're probably safest to compare a
partition at a time
I was more thinking of a tool, which test the whole disc surface
and reports every bad sector.
badblocks -wvs (which takes forever, but in my experience is quite good
at make failing disks actually fail ;)
During the test you can monitor the smart attributes (smartctl -A, esp.
the reallocated
Andrea Conti a...@alyf.net [10-05-27 17:20]:
I was more thinking of a tool, which test the whole disc surface
and reports every bad sector.
badblocks -wvs (which takes forever, but in my experience is quite good
at make failing disks actually fail ;)
During the test you can monitor the
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com [10-05-26 17:19]:
On 2010-05-26, meino.cra...@gmx.de meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
[...] I have two WDC WD10EARS-00Y5B1 (pasted from
hdparm -i) harddisk (1TB, advanced format 4096 kb sectors).
[...]
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=8192
On Mittwoch 26 Mai 2010, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com [10-05-26 17:19]:
On 2010-05-26, meino.cra...@gmx.de meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
[...] I have two WDC WD10EARS-00Y5B1 (pasted from
hdparm -i) harddisk (1TB, advanced format 4096 kb sectors).
On Wed, 26 May 2010 19:59:32 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
May be: The WD-harddiscs are SATA2 my controllers are only SATA1...
is it this, which cause the problems?
usually it shouldn't.
It has done for me in the past. SATA2 drives usually have a jumper to
switch them to SATA1.
--
On Mittwoch 26 Mai 2010, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010 19:59:32 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
May be: The WD-harddiscs are SATA2 my controllers are only SATA1...
is it this, which cause the problems?
usually it shouldn't.
It has done for me in the past. SATA2 drives
On Wed, 26 May 2010 21:13:06 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
that is why I used 'usually' and 'shouldn't'.
Have you considered a career in politics? ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
A clean desk is a sign of a cluttered desk drawer.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk [10-05-27 02:04]:
On Wed, 26 May 2010 21:13:06 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
that is why I used 'usually' and 'shouldn't'.
Have you considered a career in politics? ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
A clean desk is a sign of a cluttered desk drawer.
Oh,
walt w41...@gmail.com [10-05-27 04:08]:
On 05/26/2010 05:19 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Is there any way to check the disk without damaging its
contents?
Do you know about SMART? Install sys-apps/smartmontools if you
don't already have it, and read the manpage for smartctl.
I add
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 04:43 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
walt w41...@gmail.com [10-05-27 04:08]:
On 05/26/2010 05:19 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Is there any way to check the disk without damaging its
contents?
Do you know about SMART? Install sys-apps/smartmontools if you
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:52 +0800, W.Kenworthy wrote:
So something like SMART is the only way for the average Joe to get the
health of a drive.
Google has lots on this sort of thing
That sentence is correct in more than one way! Google the generic term
for any web page found via searching
19 matches
Mail list logo
