Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd + openvpn

2015-02-13 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote: No, the problem in Fedora was thier selinux. I suppose to be some extra security, but it seems to me it creates only more problems. A common observation with SELinux. Even so, it definitely DOES provide additional security.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd + openvpn

2015-02-12 Thread Joseph
On 02/11/15 19:26, Rich Freeman wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I see the same, which I feel is a systemd bug. The escaping trick works only with the 'enable' command, not stop or start. Dumb. It seems more likely to be an error with the unit,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd + openvpn

2015-02-11 Thread Joseph
On 02/11/15 15:26, walt wrote: On 02/11/2015 02:38 PM, Joseph wrote: On 02/11/15 13:52, walt wrote: On 02/11/2015 10:58 AM, Joseph wrote: on Fedora when I do systemctl enable openvpn@eeepc.service I get: Failed to execute operation: No such file or directory. You need to escape the @ by

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd + openvpn

2015-02-11 Thread Joseph
On 02/11/15 13:52, walt wrote: On 02/11/2015 10:58 AM, Joseph wrote: on Fedora when I do systemctl enable openvpn@eeepc.service I get: Failed to execute operation: No such file or directory. You need to escape the @ by typing openvpn\@eeepc.service, which is not clear from the error message.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd + openvpn

2015-02-11 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I see the same, which I feel is a systemd bug. The escaping trick works only with the 'enable' command, not stop or start. Dumb. It seems more likely to be an error with the unit, which has nothing to do with systemd. As I