Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-08 Thread Joerg Schilling
Nicolas Sebrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 11:46:30AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: SUSv2 is the latest standard that includes tar. And we should use pax instead of tar looking to SUSv3. Not sure pax can internaly deal with lzma file format. There are many pax

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-08 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 08:00:38PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: There are many pax implementations and the pax implementation that is usually seen on Linux is based on GNU cpio. Weird. The implementation that I've ever seen on Linux platforms is the BSD one. -- Nicolas Sebrecht

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-08 Thread Joerg Schilling
Nicolas Sebrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 08:00:38PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: There are many pax implementations and the pax implementation that is usually seen on Linux is based on GNU cpio. Weird. The implementation that I've ever seen on Linux

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-07 Thread Joerg Schilling
Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This old way of writing `tar' options can surprise even experienced users. For example, the two commands: tar cfz archive.tar.gz file tar -cfz archive.tar.gz file are quite different. So I use either tar --lzma -xv -f

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-07 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Freitag 07 November 2008 09:50:45 schrieb Joerg Schilling: The correct official tar syntax does not use '-'. If you like to be 100% that a tar command should work, ddon't use '-' in front of options. Yes, sure. That's why % tar --lzma tvf /gentoo/distfiles/texlive-module-context-

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-07 Thread Joerg Schilling
Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Freitag 07 November 2008 11:15:09 schrieb Joerg Schilling: GNU tar is not 100% with parsing command lines in a standard compliant way, but omitting the '-' is correct. Which standard? SUSv2, the precursor of SUSv3 (also known as POSIX.1-2001).

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-07 Thread Joerg Schilling
Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Freitag 07 November 2008 09:50:45 schrieb Joerg Schilling: The correct official tar syntax does not use '-'. If you like to be 100% that a tar command should work, ddon't use '-' in front of options. Yes, sure. That's why % tar --lzma tvf

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-07 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Freitag, 7. November 2008 11:46:30 schrieb Joerg Schilling: SUSv2, the precursor of SUSv3 (also known as POSIX.1-2001). OK, thanks. Bye... Dirk

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-07 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Freitag 07 November 2008 11:15:09 schrieb Joerg Schilling: GNU tar is not 100% with parsing command lines in a standard compliant way, but omitting the '-' is correct. Which standard? It you add --lzma you use a 100% on-portable command line. So what? Bye... Dirk -- Dirk

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-07 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 11:46:30AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: SUSv2 is the latest standard that includes tar. And we should use pax instead of tar looking to SUSv3. Not sure pax can internaly deal with lzma file format. -- Nicolas Sebrecht

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-06 Thread Florian Philipp
Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto schrieb: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Nickolay Hodyunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How to extract lzma archives? by lzma archive, you probably mean a lzma-compressed tar archive. You can extract them with lzma -dc compressedarchive.tar.lzma | tar -xv -f - This

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-06 Thread Etaoin Shrdlu
On Thursday 6 November 2008, 11:39, Florian Philipp wrote: Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto schrieb: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Nickolay Hodyunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How to extract lzma archives? by lzma archive, you probably mean a lzma-compressed tar archive. You can extract

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-06 Thread Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto schrieb: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Nickolay Hodyunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How to extract lzma archives? by lzma archive, you probably mean a lzma-compressed tar archive. You can

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-05 Thread Etaoin Shrdlu
On Wednesday 5 November 2008, 17:38, Nickolay Hodyunya wrote: How to extract lzma archives? $ eix lzma * app-arch/lzma Available versions: ~4.27 ~4.43 ~4.57 {doc} Homepage:http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html Description: LZMA Stream Compressor from the SDK [U]

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-05 Thread Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Nickolay Hodyunya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How to extract lzma archives? by lzma archive, you probably mean a lzma-compressed tar archive. You can extract them with lzma -dc compressedarchive.tar.lzma | tar -xv -f - or, if your version of tar supports it, tar

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-05 Thread Erik Hahn
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:38:44PM +0700, Nickolay Hodyunya wrote: How to extract lzma archives? emerge lzma-utils man lzma -- v4sw5RUYhw2ln3pr5ck0ma2u7Lw3+2Xm0l6/7Gi2e2t3b6AKMen5+7a16s0Sr1p-5.62/-6.56g6OR

Re: [gentoo-user] lzma archives

2008-11-05 Thread Rodolphe Rocca
Nickolay Hodyunya wrote: How to extract lzma archives? package: lzma-utils command: lzma -d filename