Re: [gentoo-user] Clang has gone walkabout

On Monday 10 Apr 2017 11:08:05 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote: > > Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed > > > > on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an > >

[gentoo-user] Clang has gone walkabout

Hi all, Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an executable. I can even nearly build my whole machine using clang, so its up and running. I've now just updated clang, from a working 3.9.1 to a

Re: [gentoo-user] Clang has gone walkabout

On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote: > Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed > on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an > executable. I can even nearly build my whole machine using clang, so > it

[gentoo-user] Re: Clang has gone walkabout

On 04/10/2017 12:13 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote: Hi all, Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an executable. I can even nearly build my whole machine using clang, so its up and running. I'v

Re: [gentoo-user] Clang has gone walkabout

On 10/04/17 18:08, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote: Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an executable. I can even nearly build my whole mac

Re: [gentoo-user] Clang has gone walkabout

On April 10, 2017 12:41:54 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Lowe <a...@wht.com.au> wrote: >On 10/04/17 18:08, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote: >> >>> Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed >>> on

[gentoo-user] Comparatively slow clang startup vs. gcc - reasons?

(paging Michał Górny..) I've noticed that clang has gotten really slow, and while it does great analysis during the various compilation stages (which is fine), the startup itself is a major contributor to perceived slowness. Nothing demonstrates this better than running ./configure in a random

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 02:45:02PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote > >>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/compiler-rt-18.1.0 > * Building using a compiler other than clang may result in broken atomics > * library. Enable USE=clang unless you have a very good reason no

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 08:43:46PM +0100, ralfconn wrote > Given the warning message reported by Peter ("Enable USE=clang unless > you have a very good reason not to.") That message comes from sys-libs/compiler-rt which is a dedicated runtime lib for clang. It makes se

[gentoo-user] ebuild for gcc-independent llvm and clang for linux

Hello everybody, I'm going to build and install llvm and clang packages in my Linux PC as 1. Binaries of llvm and claag installed finally were compiled by clang. 2. The binaries of 1. depend on libc++.so instead of libstdc++.so. 3. libc++.so was installed by portage. 4. The binaries of llvm

[gentoo-user] Is there a reason why LLVM/Clang ebuilds don't support "mutislot"?

Other distros like Ubuntu support the installation of multiple versions of LLVM/Clang side by side. One of the things Clang is really good at is support for the most recently approved upcoming features of the C++17 standard. The best support for testing such features is with the latest sys-devel

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Mammoth emerge ...

. Chromium switched to 'clang++ v5.x' as its primary compiler. Why? The Chromium devs are using 'c++' features supported in gcc v8+. . So ... first compile run is with 'gcc' ... then Chromium is re-compiled with 'clang++'. That is what I am seeing ( console && log wise ). 2 Compile runs .

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

On Saturday, 9 March 2024 12:49:33 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: > I have "-clang" in USE in make.conf and no problems resulting from it. > clang seems to be another "solution in search of a problem" along the > lines of rust and cups and systemd and hatbuzz, etc, which ke

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

Il 10/03/24 15:08, Peter Humphrey ha scritto: On Sunday, 10 March 2024 07:17:27 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: So there are at least 2 people who've found out that Firefox can and *MUST* be built with USE="-clang". Ah. I'll change my USE flag straight away. Thanks Walter. This got me

Re: [gentoo-user] Clang has gone walkabout

On 10/04/17 18:57, J. Roeleveld wrote: On April 10, 2017 12:41:54 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Lowe <a...@wht.com.au> wrote: On 10/04/17 18:08, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote: Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed

Re: [gentoo-user] Clang has gone walkabout

00, Andrew Lowe wrote: > >>> > >>>> Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed > >>>> on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an > >>>> executable. I can even nearly build my wh

Re: [gentoo-user] Clang has gone walkabout

wrote: Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an executable. I can even nearly build my whole machine using clang, so its up and running. I've now just updated clang, from a working 3.9.

[gentoo-user] Re: llvm compile error

Before this gets out of hand.. On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:44:38 +0100, Silvio Siefke wrote: llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very different. Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang alone llvm i not need. I think mesa use llvm

Re: [gentoo-user] clang <<==>> gcc ?

Rasmus.thomsen <rasmus.thom...@protonmail.com> schrieb am So., 30. Apr. 2017, 12:19: > Hello, > > it's entirely possible to replace gcc for clang for *most* packages, > however some will not build currently and will require you to set up a > package.env file with entries for

Re: [gentoo-user] Failed to emerge www-client/firefox-68.4.1, Log file:

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:46 PM Daniel Frey wrote: > > On 1/16/20 10:40 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote: > > Hello list, > > I have been trying for a while getting firefox emerged; no luck. > > Inputs appreciated. > > Thanks, > > -- > > Valmor > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Failed to emerge www-client/firefox-68.4.1, Log file:

On 1/16/20 10:40 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote: Hello list, I have been trying for a while getting firefox emerged; no luck. Inputs appreciated. Thanks, -- Valmor * sys-devel/clang:9 is missing! Cannot use LLVM slot 9 ... Do you have this installed? What's the output of `equery list llvm

[gentoo-user] Re: sys-devel/llvm and LLVM_TARGETS

s the target but I don't quite understand >>>> the why.  The biggest thing, will this break something if I let it do >>>> it? >>> >>> No. Unlike GCC, LLVM/Clang is always a cross-compiler. >> >> You can't use LLVM/Clang to compile for the hos

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for gcc-independent llvm and clang for linux

Sorry, I mistook the operation of Gmail. I will send with full-written article again. 2013/12/26 やまぐちたかゆき tyamaguchi.gen...@gmail.com: Hello everybody, I'm going to build and install llvm and clang packages in my Linux PC as 1. Binaries of llvm and claag installed finally were compiled

[gentoo-user] clang <<==>> gcc ?

Hi, before I do a lot of reconfiguring, recompiling and finally do the same thing again in the opposite direction: What are the experiences to replace gcc with clang for either only userland tools or the whole system (with haveing gcc as fallback)? Is it worth the effort? What are the benefits

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: sys-devel/llvm and LLVM_TARGETS

On Sunday, 13 March 2022 08:03:04 GMT Wols Lists wrote: > To the best of my knowledge, gcc can't currently handle Rust, so yes > LLVM is needed. (Not Clang, because it isn't C :-) (Although Firefox > probably also uses loads of C, so Clang would be needed for that.) And that's why we

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

On Saturday, 9 March 2024 19:37:40 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: > On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 02:45:02PM +, Peter Humphr > The real question is what else, besides clang and its libraries, are you > building that requires clang? Firefox. -- Regards, Peter.

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for gcc-independent llvm and clang for linux

Sorry for earlier mis-send. I send the article again. I'm going to build and install llvm and clang packages in my Linux PC as 1. Binaries of llvm and claag installed finally were compiled by clang. 2. The binaries of 1. depend on libc++.so instead of libstdc++.so. 3. libc++.so

Re: [gentoo-user] mesa-12.0.1 fails to emerge

function for call > to > ‘ > clang::CompilerInvocation::setLangDefaults(clang::LangOptions&, > clang::InputKind > , llvm::Triple, clang::LangStandard::Kind)’ > = > > Extract from compile log attached. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] mesa-12.0.1 fails to emerge

allium/state_track > > ers/clover/llvm/invocation.cpp:212:75: error: no matching function for > > call to ‘ > > clang::CompilerInvocation::setLangDefaults(clang::LangOptions&, > > clang::InputKind > > , llvm::Triple, clang::LangStandard::Kind)’ > > ==

Re: [gentoo-user] clang <<==>> gcc ?

Hello, it's entirely possible to replace gcc for clang for *most* packages, however some will not build currently and will require you to set up a package.env file with entries for those packages (like described on clang's wiki entry). Clang usually compiles faster than GCC does, but produces

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Mammoth emerge ...

On Thursday, 3 May 2018 18:00:45 BST Corbin Bird wrote: > . > Chromium switched to 'clang++ v5.x' as its primary compiler. > Why? > The Chromium devs are using 'c++' features supported in gcc v8+. > . > So ... first compile run is with 'gcc' ... then Chromium is re-comp

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: llvm compile error

make emerge -av clang and become gentoomobile siefke # emerge -av clang These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild N~] sys-devel/llvm-3.4:0/3.4 USE=clang libffi ncurses python static-analyzer xml -debug -doc -gold -multitarget -ocaml

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox crashes on some www-pages on a newer Gentoo system

> > > I would do something like 'emerge -1 xorg-server xorg-drivers > > @x11-module-rebuild mesa llvm clang' then restart X and try again. > > Thank you for your reply. > > Initially, I understood the above recomendation as the suggestion to > rebuild the packages

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox crashes on some www-pages on a newer Gentoo system

2018-08-02 3:16 GMT+03:00 Adam Carter : >> > I would do something like 'emerge -1 xorg-server xorg-drivers >> > @x11-module-rebuild mesa llvm clang' then restart X and try again. >> >> Thank you for your reply. >> >> Initially, I understood the above rec

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: sys-devel/llvm and LLVM_TARGETS

Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday, 13 March 2022 08:03:04 GMT Wols Lists wrote: > >> To the best of my knowledge, gcc can't currently handle Rust, so yes >> LLVM is needed. (Not Clang, because it isn't C :-) (Although Firefox >> probably also uses loads of C,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: sys-devel/llvm and LLVM_TARGETS

On 12/03/2022 17:36, Dale wrote: I've sort of read about llvm and clang and I seem to recall things like Firefox needing them or something. I've just watched firefox emerging (yes I know, paint drying and all that :-), and there's loads of Rust code in there. To the best of my knowledge

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failes due to no valid source for pythonexec-2.2 when I have pythonexec-2.4 installed???

ec-2.4.8::gentoo (Missing IUSE: python_targets_python3_6) > (dependency required by "sys-devel/clang-9.0.1::gentoo" [installed]) > (dependency required by "@selected" [set]) > (dependency required by "@world" [argument]) Why do you have clang 9 installed? It

Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird build failure ..

Cal, On Sunday, 2023-01-01 13:21:34 -0800, you wrote: > ... > You're right, it looks like the Thunderbird ebuild has a clang USE > turned on by default; On my rig "clang" and "llvm" used about 90 minutes each to build and af- terwards often caused rebuilds for ot

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 08:04:06AM +, Wols Lists wrote > For anyone else who hits this sort of problem, I did an > > USE=-clang emerge --update @world > > (firefox and thunderbird were the only programs I thought this would > touch), and it worked. I have "-cla

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

Il 10/03/24 23:44, Walter Dnes ha scritto: On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 08:43:46PM +0100, ralfconn wrote Given the warning message reported by Peter ("Enable USE=clang unless you have a very good reason not to.") That message comes from sys-libs/compiler-rt which is a dedicated r

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing compilers

in the top 500 list :) It's amazing how fast this list changes, 6 months ago, this machine was at 107 and 6 months before that 87. Andrew Just in closing on this subject, thanks to those who responded, have a quick look at this page from the llvm/clang project: http://clang.llvm.org

Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a reason why LLVM/Clang ebuilds don't support "mutislot"?

This also makes it difficult to use GHC's LLVM backend, since its compatible versions usually lag behind the current one.

[gentoo-user] Re: sys-devel/llvm and LLVM_TARGETS

On 2022-03-12, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 12/03/2022 10:43, Dale wrote: >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/767700 >> >> Is that the one?  It mentions the target but I don't quite understand >> the why.  The biggest thing, will this break something if I let it do >> i

[gentoo-user] Re: sys-devel/llvm and LLVM_TARGETS

it? No. Unlike GCC, LLVM/Clang is always a cross-compiler. You can't use LLVM/Clang to compile for the host on which it's running? Why not?

[gentoo-user] llvm clang ABI confusion

sys-devel/llvm:0 sys-devel/llvm-3.5.0:0/3.5::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge conflicts with sys-devel/llvm-3.5.0[clang(-),-debug,python,static- analyzer,abi_x86_32(-),abi_x86_64(-)] required by (sys-devel/clang-3.5.0-r100:0/3.5::gentoo, installed) I have both installed:: [I] sys-d

[gentoo-user] Re: llvm clang ABI confusion

Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > 1. Relax your stance and accept that some software out there that you > might want is 32 bits > 2. Refuse to have 32 bits, so give up on llvm and clang. Find something > else and move on. > You must pick one of those two. There is no mag

Re: [gentoo-user] kdevelop broken (llvm slot issue)

ther programs pull in llvm:6 (via clang:6) > > Does anyone have an idea how to get a working kdevelop again? I think you have to not have multiple LLVM/Clang installations, unfortunately. That's what the bug indicates. I am not having issues with KDevelop with Clang support and I have

[gentoo-user] kdevelop broken (llvm slot issue)

ther programs pull in llvm:6 (via clang:6) > > Does anyone have an idea how to get a working kdevelop again? I think you have to not have multiple LLVM/Clang installations, unfortunately. That's what the bug indicates. I am not having issues with KDevelop with Clang support and I have

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm clang ABI confusion

ot; 82,629 KiB > > Total: 3 packages (3 upgrades), Size of downloads: 292,827 KiB > > WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a > dependency conflict: > > sys-devel/llvm:0 > > sys-devel/llvm-3.5.0:0/3.5::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge > conf

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm compile error

Hello, On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very different. Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang alone llvm i not need. I think mesa use llvm too

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm compile error

On 24/01/2014 20:44, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very different. Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang

Re: [gentoo-user] mesa-12.0.1 fails to emerge

ia- >>> libs/mesa-12.0.1/work/mesa-12.0.1/src/gallium/state_track >>> ers/clover/llvm/invocation.cpp:212:75: error: no matching function for >>> call to ‘ >>> clang::CompilerInvocation::setLangDefaults(clang:

[gentoo-user] mesa-12.0.1 fails to emerge

How could I go beyond this point? /var/tmp/portage/media- libs/mesa-12.0.1/work/mesa-12.0.1/src/gallium/state_track ers/clover/llvm/invocation.cpp:212:75: error: no matching function for call to ‘ clang::CompilerInvocation::setLangDefaults(clang

[gentoo-user] Firefox 64 binaries - LLVM6+PGO+LTO now used, faster than GCC6.4+PGO

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Firefox-Clang-LTO-All-Platforms "Firefox nightly builds are now built with the LLVM Clang compiler on all major platforms and the Linux build in particular is also now utilizing PGO optimizations too. Faster Firefox is coming t

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 09:16:37PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote > On Saturday, 9 March 2024 19:37:40 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 02:45:02PM +, Peter Humphr > > The real question is what else, besides clang and its libraries, > are you buildin

Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird build failure ..

Thanks bud Dave On Sun, Jan 1, 2023, 4:22 PM cal wrote: > On 1/1/23 13:05, Wol wrote: > > On 01/01/2023 20:08, cal wrote: > >> FWIW, Thunderbird builds fine with GCC on my machine -- I'm unsure of > >> your reasons for setting your Portage compiler to clang, b

Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird build failure ..

' > >> Can you post the outputs referenced above/the full build log and your >> portage configuration? > > Files attached - not sure it's everything you want, but I'm sure you'll > let me know if I've messed up ... :-) If you scroll up a bit in build.log, you can see that clang has

Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird build failure ..

On 1/1/23 13:05, Wol wrote: > On 01/01/2023 20:08, cal wrote: >> FWIW, Thunderbird builds fine with GCC on my machine -- I'm unsure of >> your reasons for setting your Portage compiler to clang, but you may >> wish to use a package.env override to build Thunderbird with G

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

On 10/03/24 at 01:50, mp666 wrote: On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 08:04:06 +, Wols Lists wrote: For anyone else who hits this sort of problem, I did an USE=-clang emerge --update @world (firefox and thunderbird were the only programs I thought this would touch), and it worked. There were a couple

[gentoo-user] Libclc and OpenCL

Hello list, Bug 596022 reports failure to build dev-libs/libclc with the latest version of sys-dev/clang. I've been trying to trace a problem running MilkyWay@home, specifically with its use of the GPU, so I'm keen to make sure that I have a properly working OpenCL system. Is my existing

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: chromium-65.0.3325.146 compilation warnings

elieve I possess the abilities to be developer. :-) > GCC 7.3 and Clang 6.0 do support these options, but if you're using a > version that doesn't, it's of no consequence. Warning options do not > affect code generation. OK, I think it's clang what done it. I'm on gcc-7.3.0, but clang-5

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm compile error

On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:44:38 +0100 Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote: Hello, On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very different. Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4

Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird build failure ..

On 01/01/2023 20:08, cal wrote: FWIW, Thunderbird builds fine with GCC on my machine -- I'm unsure of your reasons for setting your Portage compiler to clang, but you may wish to use a package.env override to build Thunderbird with GCC as a workaround until the problem can be fixed upstream. I

[gentoo-user] Re: Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 08:04:06 +, Wols Lists wrote: > For anyone else who hits this sort of problem, I did an > > USE=-clang emerge --update @world > > (firefox and thunderbird were the only programs I thought this would > touch), and it worked. > > There were a

[gentoo-user] Re: new computer : any advice ?

ices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Cape Verde PRO [Radeon HD 7750 / R7 250E] I did notice in a gentoo blog that openmp is a testing option for Clang-3.7 now? [1] Try not to loose faith, we all have had bad experiences, but clustering, distributed and systems aggregation codes are rapidly coalescing into

[gentoo-user] Re: llvm clang ABI confusion

James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > > 1. Relax your stance and accept that some software out there that you > > might want is 32 bits > > 2. Refuse to have 32 bits, so give up on llvm and clang. Find something > > else and move on. > > You must pick one of th

Re: [gentoo-user] kdevelop broken (llvm slot issue)

Am Sonntag, 19. August 2018, 17:57:55 CEST schrieb Andrew Udvare: > > I am not having issues with KDevelop with Clang support and I have > everything on the latest version: > > LLVM 6.0.1-r1 libffi ncurses > Clang 6.0.1 +static-analyzer LLVM_TARGETS="AMDGPU BPF NVPTX X86&

[gentoo-user] kdevelop broken (llvm slot issue)

Hi there, After recent upgrades of mesa, llvm, clang etc kdevelop does not work anymore. It crashes immediately after start with errors : CommandLine Error: Option 'help-list' registered more than once! LLVM ERROR: inconsistency in registered CommandLine options This issue is covered by bug

[gentoo-user] Re: kdevelop broken (llvm slot issue)

On 19/08/18 18:21, Alexander Puchmayr wrote: After recent upgrades of mesa, llvm, clang etc kdevelop does not work anymore. It crashes immediately after start with errors [...] It seems as if multiple slots of llvm cause the problems. mesa pulls in llvm: 5, while other programs pull in llvm:6

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm / clang compile error

-parameter -Wwrite-strings > -Wcast-qual -Wno-missing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long > -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-comment -Werror=date-time > -std=c++11 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-common > -Woverloaded-virtual -fno-strict-aliasing -f

[gentoo-user] llvm / clang compile error

-Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-comment -Werror=date-time -std=c++11 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-common -Woverloaded-virtual -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -Itools/clang/lib/Sema -I/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-3.7.1-r3/work/llvm-3.7.1.src/tools/clang/lib/Sema -I/var/tmp/p

[gentoo-user] You need at least GCC 4.7.x or Clang = 3.0 for C++11-specific compiler flags

Hello mates, I am facing the following issue, not sure why I have been trying to fix it for 3 days now. I've also installed Clang, but the same results. Additional information: ~AMD64 emerge --info here: http://tny.cz/c2210f24 Build log: ^[[32;01m * ^[[39;49;00mPackage:net-libs/webkit

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm compile error

FreeBSD use it and say is stable. FreeBSD maybe not the reference on earth but the BSD's make a good job. When i saw all versions of Clang is masked. Isn't FBSD more similar than, say, Linux, to what OSX is, sort of? I could be way off. But I think of OSX as being FBSD built for people

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm / clang compile error

On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 08:36:12 -0400 james wrote: > On 08/16/2016 04:43 PM, Silvio Siefke wrote: > > Please submit a full bug report https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591514 Silvio

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm / clang compile error

On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 08:36:12 -0400 james wrote: Okay i will open Bug Report. But can it be that the memory / swap is to small? cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal:2024472 kB cat /proc/swaps FilenameTypeSizeUsedPriority /dev/sda2 partition

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm / clang compile error

I've only mildly used clang, at this point, so it'll take somebody else to spot what's wrong, or who knows clang more deeply. But, now you can keep your posts short and precise in gentoo-user and reference your but like this BGO#591514. Also, if you are not copied on the postings to your bug, g

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm / clang compile error

On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 21:40:40 -0400 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: Hi, > If you havent, try disabling ccache to rule that out. i have do now. Same mistake. Same error message. Silvio pgp0yrcGvf49z.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a reason why LLVM/Clang ebuilds don't support "mutislot"?

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:58:03PM -0400, P Levine wrote: > Other distros like Ubuntu support the installation of multiple versions of > LLVM/Clang side by side. One of the things Clang is really good at is > support for the most recently approved upcoming features of the C++17 &

[gentoo-user] Re: Clang has gone walkabout

On 04/10/2017 03:58 PM, Simon Thelen wrote: Try running `env-update && source /etc/profile'. Your path should be extended by /etc/profile.env which is generated from /etc/env.d/10llvm-9995. Just logout/login. "source" will help in the current shell.

[gentoo-user] Re: sys-devel/llvm and LLVM_TARGETS

On 12/03/2022 10:43, Dale wrote: https://bugs.gentoo.org/767700 Is that the one?  It mentions the target but I don't quite understand the why.  The biggest thing, will this break something if I let it do it? No. Unlike GCC, LLVM/Clang is always a cross-compiler. This just enables some extra

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

On Sunday, 10 March 2024 07:17:27 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: > So there are at least 2 people who've found out that Firefox can and > *MUST* be built with USE="-clang". Ah. I'll change my USE flag straight away. Thanks Walter. -- Regards, Peter.

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox fails to compile. crc32 error??

efore trying new settings for that, I tried newer versions of clang, llvm and their friends to see if there was a fix that wasn't applied to older versions.  When you unmask one thing, it snowballs a bit.  Anyway, after getting a more recent version of clang and llvm, it still failed.  At that point,

Re: [gentoo-user] Epic list of total FAIL.

/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.3/include/g++-v4/functional:55:0, from /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-3.6.2/work/llvm-3.6.2.src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/../../../include/clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h:22, from /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-3.6.2

Re: [gentoo-user] Epic list of total FAIL.

# ### In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.3/include/g++-v4/functional:55:0, from /var/tmp/portage/sys- devel/llvm-3.6.2/work/llvm-3.6.2.src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/../../../include/clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h:22, from /var/tmp/portage

[gentoo-user] Epic list of total FAIL.

/portage/sys-devel/llvm-3.6.2/work/llvm-3.6.2.src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/../../../include/clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h:22, from /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-3.6.2/work/llvm-3.6.2.src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/../../../include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core

Re: [gentoo-user] Epic list of total FAIL.

/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.3/include/g++-v4/functional:55:0, from /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-3.6.2/work/llvm-3.6.2.src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/../../../include/clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h:22, from /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-3.6.2

Re: [gentoo-user] eix and bad colors.

. local settings, ext. overlays, version changes, and more HOMEPAGE=http://eix.berlios.de; SRC_URI= PROPERTIES=live LICENSE=GPL-2 SLOT=0 KEYWORDS= IUSE=clang debug +dep doc nls optimization security strong-optimization sqlite tools zsh-completion RDEPEND=app-shells/push sqlite? ( =dev

Re: [gentoo-user] Sweet Sweet Portage

th-bdeps=y --backtrack=30? Also try without the -p (I think it runs more code like autounmask etc so it may cause the extra output). Is clang/llvm stuff still popping up on the list of skipped packages? I remember a similar conflict around the time of your first post and it turned out that the lat

Re: [gentoo-user] Sweet Sweet Portage

tra output). Is clang/llvm stuff still popping up on the list of skipped packages? I remember a similar conflict around the time of your first post and it turned out that the latest stable clang blocks the latest stable libclc. So the tree is (still) broken. For most users it's not a problem becau

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] LiveCDs for Uni students

, a browser and gcc or clang. Andrew System Rescue CD fulfils the above requirements. You can go straight to XFCE, be root with no user/password, by default automatically configures network with DHCP. Editor is vim (I believe), browser is Midori, and gcc is present; I didn't think

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] LiveCDs for Uni students

, no username/password, has dhcp, a decent editor, a browser and gcc or clang. Andrew System Rescue CD fulfils the above requirements. You can go straight to XFCE, be root with no user/password, by default automatically configures network with DHCP. Editor is vim (I believe), browser

Re: [gentoo-user] Paraview 4.2 not building

. the C++ standard. I suggest, you create a bug report. Helmut Will do. I also have Clang installed on this machine and set that to compile paraview. Unlike under gcc where it failed at trying to link libvtkRenderingOpenGL, it is now failing when trying to link

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm / clang compile error

set and just use one processor to compile, as a routine, baseline test-compile run. Also on my system, I have this:: Installed versions: 3.7.1-r3(03:48:50 PM 07/13/2016)(clang libffi ncurses python static-analyzer ABI_X86="32 64 -x32" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7" hth, James

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Spectre-NG

On 09/05/18 19:18, Martin Vaeth wrote: > As mentioned, I wonder why gcc/clang do not yet support this > horribly slow but spectre-safe option. It can't be that hard to > implement in the actual code-producing back-end. Given the response by the gcc team to security people complaining

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

t; Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, > if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. > To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain. > To compile the kernel with a different compiler, the method shown below may be used, e.g.: make CC=clang See [1], for details: Building the kernel with Clang: [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/734071/

Re: [gentoo-user] Comparatively slow clang startup vs. gcc - reasons?

On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:55 PM Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > Can we do something about this? I remember that llvm had optional static > libs, which apparently were removed completely. Is there something > that can be done with linker tricks (better relocation info?) when > buildin

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove rust completely

and their build time (gcc, bin-utils, llvm, clang ... etc.) and now rust. Tongue in cheek, but have you tried doing away with gcc, clang etc? If you're going to use a source-based system, a bunch of compilers "comes with the territory". Many people see Rust as a "better C than C"

Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird build failure .. [Gone away]

On 01/01/2023 21:05, Wol wrote: On 01/01/2023 20:08, cal wrote: FWIW, Thunderbird builds fine with GCC on my machine -- I'm unsure of your reasons for setting your Portage compiler to clang, but you may wish to use a package.env override to build Thunderbird with GCC as a workaround until

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge trouble with firefox and thunderbird ...

, as indecipherable as we know it sometimes can be.  If they crash when running, try running from command line. Some time ago on one of my machines Thunderbird and Firefox stopped to compile with USE="clang". As they can be build with gcc I never digged too deep into that problem but

[gentoo-user] Re: You need at least GCC 4.7.x or Clang = 3.0 for C++11-specific compiler flags

Nevermind mates, I've just upgraded the GCC to latest and it worked out. Thanks! On 27 July 2013 20:55, Carlos Sura carlos.su...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello mates, I am facing the following issue, not sure why I have been trying to fix it for 3 days now. I've also installed Clang

  1   2   3   4   >