· Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 09 May 2008 15:38:51 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
No. Not to a drive used for backups of Linux machines.
Why?
Different OS.
So. We can use the same web pages, read the same email, why not share
hardware?
Because it doesn't make
On Saturday 10 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final.
Why? What features are you expecting?
The comment is, Gentoo
home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo
is alive becomes tricky because the final is months late
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi,
We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo
home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo is
alive becomes tricky because the final is months late and little
motion on the home page. That's about all most people
Ian Hilt wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2008 at 5:53pm +0200, Wolf Canis wrote:
Hello,
I just experienced the same problem. Could you solve your problem?
If so could you post the solution?
Some data of mine:
I'm in the groups:
On Saturday 10 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo
home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo
is alive becomes tricky because the final is months late and little
motion on the home page.
On Friday 09 May 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
A backup device is just a storage appliance, if should not be
parochial about the origin of the data it stores.
Agreed. I have gentoo boxes out there that contain backups for
themselves, other gentoo machines, tens of various Windows machines and
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
On Saturday 10 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo
home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo
is alive becomes tricky because the final is months late and little
motion
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
A backup device is just a storage appliance, if should not be
parochial about the origin of the data it stores.
But because there are different requirements (features of the
filesystems), what you're saying is not correct.
No, what YOU
On Friday 09 May 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2008 21:50:09 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
Check for /boot/grub/menu.lst, this is an alternate (and maybe
empty) config file which grub seems to prefer over
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 16:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo
home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo is
alive becomes tricky because the final is months late and little
motion on the home
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 19:57 -0500, Tim wrote:
paul wrote:
I am sure that this is all explained somewhere but I cannot find it
easily.
When running emerge -av gnome-light I get :
[blocks B ] gnome-base/control-center-2.22 (is blocking
gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-2.22.1)
I'm talking about the USB wireless adapter (I don't think I can
connect the antenna to my laptop directly),
not the passphrase key...
Ah. I've got a Hawking HWUG1 USB WiFi adapter that works fine
with Gentoo (I had to download driver source from somewhere).
It's got an R-SMA connector for
On 2008-05-10, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm talking about the USB wireless adapter (I don't think I can
connect the antenna to my laptop directly),
not the passphrase key...
Ah. I've got a Hawking HWUG1 USB WiFi adapter that works fine
with Gentoo (I had to download driver source from
forgottenwizard wrote:
On 20:13 Fri 09 May , 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
I am extremely pleased with Antivir (aka Avira) and its realtime LKM,
Dazuko!
1. The Antivir database and heuristics contain dozens of Linux-specific
rootkits and Trojans. These in addition to Windows sigs. FWICT, the only
On Saturday 10 May 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
But I sure acknowledge the majority opinion - almost ALL Linux users,
and many Windows users as well, choose not to run real-time
AntiMalware scanners.
I do this, and I do it for a perfectly obvious reason:
Your suggestion protects me from a
On 10 May 2008, at 07:07, Michael Schmarck wrote:
So. We can use the same web pages, read the same email, why not share
hardware?
Because it doesn't make sense, to share the same filesystem for
backing up Windows and Linux?
You keep saying this like it's obvious, but don't provide any good
Hi,
I've created a raid-5 (md0) with 3 hdds and chunk size=512KB.
On top of it, using the default options, I've created a lvm2 physical
disk with one volume group. vgdisplay shows PE=4MB.
Now I have several logical volumes in this group which have to be
formatted with ext3.
Here comes my
Ian Hilt ian.hilt at gmail.com writes:
So you are saying (implying) that i586 and k6 machines can
use the 2008.0.beta2
minimum CD for installation? What about all of those old drivers
that are often
I was merely providing an official Gentoo document which provided
information related
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 16:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo
home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo is
alive becomes tricky because the
On Sat, May 10, 2008 3:58 pm, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
forgottenwizard wrote:
Realtime Linux Anti-Trojan signature scanning overhead is simply cheap
(almost free) insurance IMHO, and may be most important when compiling
and installing new or updated sourcecode. Or installing a new plugin to
your
Mick michaelkintzios at gmail.com writes:
The OP has inadvertently given us some valuable feedback, which stands on its
own and is irrelevant with the fact that he (like many other non-gentoo
users) had mistaken Gentoo for yet-another-binary-distro. Having a user
friendly website that
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
# change menu.lst to grub.conf
if [[ ! -e ${dir}/grub.conf ]] [[ -e ${dir}/menu.lst ]] ;
then
mv -f ${dir}/menu.lst ${dir}/grub.conf
ewarn
ewarn ***
On Friday 09 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 09 May 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
See other thread on this very subject yesterday and today for
details:
emerge -avC all foomatic ebuilds
emerge -av all foomatic ebuilds
Yes; that worked.
Thank you very much for
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Alan McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SNIP
# change menu.lst to grub.conf
if [[ ! -e ${dir}/grub.conf ]] [[ -e ${dir}/menu.lst ]] ;
then
mv -f ${dir}/menu.lst ${dir}/grub.conf
On Samstag, 10. Mai 2008, Stroller wrote:
On 10 May 2008, at 07:07, Michael Schmarck wrote:
So. We can use the same web pages, read the same email, why not share
hardware?
Because it doesn't make sense, to share the same filesystem for
backing up Windows and Linux?
You keep saying
On Sat, 10 May 2008 16:43:41 +0100
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OP has inadvertently given us some valuable feedback, which
stands on its own and is irrelevant with the fact that he (like many
other non-gentoo users) had mistaken Gentoo for
yet-another-binary-distro. Having a user
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 10 May 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
But I sure acknowledge the majority opinion - almost ALL Linux users,
and many Windows users as well, choose not to run real-time
AntiMalware scanners.
I do this, and I do it for a perfectly obvious reason:
Your suggestion
On Sunday 11 May 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 16:43:41 +0100
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OP has inadvertently given us some valuable feedback, which
stands on its own and is irrelevant with the fact that he (like
many other non-gentoo users) had mistaken Gentoo
I recently got a couple seasons of Star Gate SG-1, and can read nearly
all the DVDs except the 3rd DVD of Season 2, which under Kernel
2.6.24-gentoo-r4 yielded the following error messags to dmesg:
hdc: media error (bad sector): status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdc: media error
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Benjamen R. Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently got a couple seasons of Star Gate SG-1, and can read nearly all
the DVDs except the 3rd DVD of Season 2, which under Kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r4
yielded the following error messags to dmesg:
hdc: media error
On Sat, 10 May 2008 21:02:21 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
if you tar 'em up you don't even need to worry about the file
permission capabilities of the underlying fs.
Isn't that exactly what I said three wrong turns and four red herrings
ago? ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
Ubuntu is an ancient
On Sat, 10 May 2008 08:07:25 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
At least I wouldn't store everything in the same directory. It would
of course be a good idea to seperate things.
sigh When did I ever mention using a single directory to mix up all
backups?
All I did was answer a question with an
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Benjamen R. Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently got a couple seasons of Star Gate SG-1, and can read nearly all
the DVDs except the 3rd DVD of Season 2, which under Kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r4
yielded the following error messags to dmesg:
hdc: media error
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Ah, but www.gentoo.org/doc actually does contain decent INFORMATION in a
manner that I can find.
Right, but I can think of better ways to search through it by category, by
keyword, by arch, by whatever, than just use Google.
All I ever seem to
On Samstag, 10. Mai 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 21:02:21 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
if you tar 'em up you don't even need to worry about the file
permission capabilities of the underlying fs.
Isn't that exactly what I said three wrong turns and four red herrings
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 00:00 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
Yep, gentoo.org really seems to have been created from devs and users
for devs and users. There is nothing like a Features page or Why to
choose Gentoo for newcomers. Heck, you have to search hard to even
learn whether it is suitable
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 3:35 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 10 May 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
But I sure acknowledge the majority opinion - almost ALL Linux users,
and many Windows users as well, choose not to run real-time
AntiMalware scanners.
37 matches
Mail list logo
