Peter Humphrey peter at prh.myzen.co.uk writes:
$ emerge xjobs
^C
Ain't nobody got time for that =)
$ ebuild $(equery w xjobs) prepare
Hey guys,
Thanks for the discussion.
I'm going to ponder these comments and test/verify suggestions a bit and
develop my semantic for this.
Thx,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 03:30:07PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
With TPM, full-disk encryption, and a verified boot path, you could
actually protect against that scenario (they'd have to tear apart the
TPM chip and try to access the non-volatile storage directly, and the
chips are specifically
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 03/28/2015 01:40 PM, Todd Goodman wrote:
Some ebuilds may patch configure.ac or Makefile.am -- in that case it's
a little harder. I'm sure there's an elegant way to do it, but what I
usually do is begin to emerge the package and Ctrl-C it when it starts
On Sunday 29 March 2015 02:24:00 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 03/29/2015 02:06 AM, Franz Fellner wrote:
Yeah, but I have to be in the directory where the ebuild lives for that
to work. `emerge foo` works anywhere. It's also more flexible -- if I
want the *unpatched* files, I just Ctrl-C
On 28-03-2015 09:34 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 07:48:48PM -0300, Sebas Pedersen wrote:
bios update/microcode update. A google search suggests that you have
run into an errata.
Oh OK, thank you. Must have miss that in the search. So you are saying
that the error
On 28-03-2015 10:13 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
On Saturday, March 28, 2015 7:48:48 PM Sebas Pedersen wrote:
I see, thanks for clarifying that. So looks like not too many options,
either try to update the bios and/or replace the CPU.
I really appreciated you replys and time.
Thanks!,
Sebas
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 16:20:31 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Sunday 29 March 2015 17:03:50 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using grub so I had to add these two lines to packages.use
sys-libs/ncurses abi_x86_32
sys-libs/gpm abi_x86_32
I don't know how grub is connected, but I had to add those
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 17:08:32 Yanestra wrote:
On 03/29/2015 05:03 PM, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
In most of the cases, Portage will be able to deliver correct
suggestions for that when using the --autounmask feature.
The first thing what happens here is that kde wants to upgrade because
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 16:42:10 Sebas Pedersen wrote:
On 28-03-2015 08:50 PM, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 28 Mar 2015 22:48:48 Sebas Pedersen wrote:
On 28-03-2015 07:37 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 28.03.2015 um 23:00 schrieb Sebas Pedersen:
On 28-03-2015 06:45 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
On 29-03-2015 12:45 PM, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 16:42:10 Sebas Pedersen wrote:
On 28-03-2015 08:50 PM, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 28 Mar 2015 22:48:48 Sebas Pedersen wrote:
On 28-03-2015 07:37 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 28.03.2015 um 23:00 schrieb Sebas Pedersen:
On
On 03/29/2015 05:03 PM, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
In most of the cases, Portage will be able to deliver correct
suggestions for that when using the --autounmask feature.
The first thing what happens here is that kde wants to upgrade because
qtchooser's mask miraculously becomes ignored. And
Yanestra wysi...@seismic.de wrote:
Hi,
just one question: I had a working system yesterday afternoon, but
after the latest eix-sync my mask settings get ignored and the whole
system is about to be updated.
I have read the news message, and I am baffled. What can I do to keep
my working
On Sunday 29 March 2015 17:03:50 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using grub so I had to add these two lines to packages.use
sys-libs/ncurses abi_x86_32
sys-libs/gpm abi_x86_32
I don't know how grub is connected, but I had to add those two as well.
and after that doing the following
On 28-03-2015 08:50 PM, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 28 Mar 2015 22:48:48 Sebas Pedersen wrote:
On 28-03-2015 07:37 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 28.03.2015 um 23:00 schrieb Sebas Pedersen:
On 28-03-2015 06:45 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 28.03.2015 um 14:58 schrieb Sebas Pedersen:
Hi
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
Be careful what you wish for. I have my doubts that TPM chips would
boot linux with Microsoft offering volume discounts to OEMS. Call me
cynical.
TPM chips don't control what boots. They just accept the hash of
On 03/29/2015 02:06 AM, Franz Fellner wrote:
Yeah, but I have to be in the directory where the ebuild lives for that
to work. `emerge foo` works anywhere. It's also more flexible -- if I
want the *unpatched* files, I just Ctrl-C earlier =)
The ebuild-command works from every directory (at
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Jorge Almeida jjalme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
and dump people keep talking nonsencely that sysvinit is enough while it
cannot even handle reboot for normal user. sad.
it can.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Yanestra wysi...@seismic.de wrote:
just one question: I had a working system yesterday afternoon, but after
the latest eix-sync my mask settings get ignored and the whole system is
about to be updated.
I have read the news message, and I am baffled. What can
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
and dump people keep talking nonsencely that sysvinit is enough while it
cannot even handle reboot for normal user. sad.
it can. Did for decaded.
Dumb systemd fanbois spouting their lies everywhere.
Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
I thought about getting a wide-gamut display, namely a Dell with
rgb-LEDs, but in the end decided against it because its quality seems
About two years ago I tested two Dell U3011. The first one had such a
bad homogeneity of luminance that I sent it back
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 17:08:32 Yanestra wrote:
On 03/29/2015 05:03 PM, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
In most of the cases, Portage will be able to deliver correct
suggestions for that when using the --autounmask feature.
The first thing what happens
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 17:43:42 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
I've also ended up with qt blockers, that I do not seem capable to
overcome yet. KDE wants qt 4.8.5 installed which is blocking qt
4.8.6. How did you go about overcoming this?
I also have
On 30/03/15 03:43, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 17:08:32 Yanestra wrote:
On 03/29/2015 05:03 PM, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
In most of the cases, Portage will be able to deliver correct
suggestions for that when using the --autounmask
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 17:43:42 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
I've also ended up with qt blockers, that I do not seem capable to
overcome yet. KDE wants qt 4.8.5 installed which is blocking qt
4.8.6. How did
On 29/03/2015 19:53, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
On 29.03.2015 19:30, Mick wrote:
I went through that exercise about a month ago, and I needed
this:
/etc/portage/package.use/abi_x86_32:
=dev-qt/qtwebkit-4.8.6-r1:4 abi_x86_32 =dev-qt/qtgui-4.8.6-r1:4
abi_x86_32 =dev-qt/qtdbus-4.8.6-r1:4
On 29/03/2015 19:30, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 18:07:50 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 29/03/2015 18:21, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 17:08:32 Yanestra wrote:
On 03/29/2015 05:03 PM, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
In most of the cases, Portage will be able to deliver correct
suggestions for
On 29/03/2015 18:21, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 17:08:32 Yanestra wrote:
On 03/29/2015 05:03 PM, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
In most of the cases, Portage will be able to deliver correct
suggestions for that when using the --autounmask feature.
The first thing what happens here is that
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 18:07:50 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 29/03/2015 18:21, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 29 Mar 2015 17:08:32 Yanestra wrote:
On 03/29/2015 05:03 PM, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
In most of the cases, Portage will be able to deliver correct
suggestions for that when using the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 29.03.2015 19:30, Mick wrote:
I went through that exercise about a month ago, and I needed
this:
/etc/portage/package.use/abi_x86_32:
=dev-qt/qtwebkit-4.8.6-r1:4 abi_x86_32 =dev-qt/qtgui-4.8.6-r1:4
abi_x86_32 =dev-qt/qtdbus-4.8.6-r1:4
On 03/29/2015 07:27 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
If you're on stable, you'll need to keyword qt-4.8.6 in its entirety.
You can't mix and match versions, and 4.8.6 is the only one that
supports multilib.
Hm, a little documentation wouldn't hurt, don't you think?
This guy has written a whole
(crossposting to -dev since this is fairly high-impact)
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/03/15 03:43, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
I also have dev-qt/qtcore-4.8.5-r2 and some other qt packages installed
but I had no problems with that.
I'm on
Hi,
just one question: I had a working system yesterday afternoon, but after
the latest eix-sync my mask settings get ignored and the whole system is
about to be updated.
I have read the news message, and I am baffled. What can I do to keep my
working system as it is?
Regards,
A Humble Usertm
walt w41...@gmail.com writes:
On 03/26/2015 07:15 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
snip all questions I can't answer
When I do a control-right-click on an xterm to manipulate fonts, the
xterm crashes.
I had the same problem once. IIRC, strace showed me that xterm was trying
to load the default
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org writes:
First of all, thanks to everybody who answered my questions, and
helped me get it working. Now for the setup. This is a home LAN, so I
don't bother with ssh tunneling, etc, which will be necessary if you're
going over untrusted links, e.g. the
Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk writes:
The remaining question is: why is the user not allowed to halt it?
It's because a user who wants to somewhat permanently disrupt the
services the machine provides would need to remain at the keyboard to
continue to reboot it and thus can be caught
Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net writes:
150322 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Sunday 22 March 2015 13:04:44 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I can reboot the system when I am a user by Ctrl+Alt+Delete.
The user can reboot the system, but can't shut down ? Strange
The thinking is that you can unplug the
Am 26.03.2015 um 01:46 schrieb microcai:
on Saturday 21 March 2015 13:58:45，Canek Peláez Valdés wrote：
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:39 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I am trying to shutdown from a console
Well, the
On 03/29/15 06:23, lee wrote:
walt w41...@gmail.com writes:
On 03/26/2015 07:15 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
snip all questions I can't answer
As to fonts, I highly recommend Source Code Pro and Source Sans Pro.
They finally resolved my long search for good fonts. Unfortunately,
they don't come
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:43:12PM +0200, lee wrote
That leaves the question why a user who isn't even logged in should
be able to reboot, which IIRC they can by default with Ctrl+Alt+Del.
Such users shouldn't be allowed to do anything but to log in.
As the old saying goes... If you don't
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:43:12PM +0200, lee wrote
That leaves the question why a user who isn't even logged in should
be able to reboot, which IIRC they can by default with Ctrl+Alt+Del.
Such users shouldn't be
On 03/30/2015 12:10 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
My main system isn't that special at all, gnome, systemd, libreoffice,
thunderbird, some browsers ... Stuff like that makes me really wonder
if I spend too much of my life time struggling with doing *updates* I
like Gentoo, you all know,
Am 29.03.2015 um 20:16 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
I have to do that for 195 ebuilds here and really wonder if that is
correct in the end
It's a horrible solution, you are right. The problem is that it's not
your 32 bit apps that have to be listed, it's all the libs and deps they
have
On 30/03/2015 00:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 29.03.2015 um 20:16 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
I have to do that for 195 ebuilds here and really wonder if that is
correct in the end
It's a horrible solution, you are right. The problem is that it's not
your 32 bit apps that have to
43 matches
Mail list logo
