Re: [gentoo-user] Re: beegfs goes opensource!

On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:51:13 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> I recall a list conversation about this, explaining that it would be > >> trivial for someone who knows how to do ebuilds, to have their own > >> ZFS-in-kernel system available, and that it would also be possible to > >> accomplish this

Re: [gentoo-user] beegfs goes opensource!

Hi all, On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:03:59 + (UTC) James wrote: > This smoking hot (many HPC scientist agree) distributed file > system will surely rock the cluster, container and Hi Performance > Computing worlds. [1] Now if I were only smart enough to get this > puppy into portage... By the

Re: [gentoo-user] weird (?) dependency is blocking freeze

Franz Fellner [16-02-28 09:08]: > > > Calculating dependencies... done! > > > media-libs/mlt-0.9.0 pulled in by: > > > media-video/openshot-1.4.3 requires > > > >=media-libs/mlt-0.8.2[ffmpeg,frei0r,gtk,melt,python,sdl,xml] > > > > > > Checking the kind of

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: beegfs goes opensource!

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:34:56 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> I would be using this on a server, so, for security reasons, no > >> module support. > > > > echo sys-fs/zfs kernel-builtin >/etc/portage/package.use > > > > You need to unmask the kernel-builtin USE flag. > > Wow...! How long has

[gentoo-user] app-emulation/free42: Any additional sources for programm examples?

Hi, For the fun of it I installed free42 - the emulator of the legendary HP42s by Hewlett and packard - and I must confess that my interest now goes further than "just for fun" ;) I googled through the web and found the programs ("*.raw") the author of free42 has published on his homepage

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: beegfs goes opensource!

On 2/28/2016 4:24 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:51:13 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: >>> I recall a list conversation about this, explaining that it would be trivial for someone who knows how to do ebuilds, to have their own ZFS-in-kernel system

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: beegfs goes opensource!

On 2/28/2016 9:09 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > I'm not really sure what the "conservative" recommendation. Ext4 (or > even ext3) is the obvious one, but both zfs and btrfs have > checksumming of all data written to disk which is a huge data security > improvement. That is a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: beegfs goes opensource!

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > > Also, it has been a while since I read anything - what is the current > state of BTRFS vs ZFS? Is it stable/mature enough to use for production? > What can ZFS do that it cannot? > This is obviously a topic people

Re: [gentoo-user] useflag hell.

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 13:14:30 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote: > !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy > ">=media-libs/mlt-0.9.8-r1[ffmpeg,kdenlive,melt,qt5,sdl,xml]" has > unmet requirements. > - media-libs/mlt-0.9.8-r2::gentoo USE="ffmpeg fftw gtk kde kdenlive lua > melt opengl python qt5 sdl xine xml

Re: [gentoo-user] useflag hell.

On 28/02/2016 20:14, Alan Grimes wrote: > I've been running number theory code for a few weeks, so haven't been > updating my machine too often... > > I for the last day or so I'm in a run my "pretendupdate" script, look at > the results, decide whether to run ufed or bleep with package.use >

Re: [gentoo-user]

Donahue Trevor wrote: > What was that again? I can't hear you. ROFLMBO Dale :-) :-)

Re: [gentoo-user]

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 13:18:17 -0600, Dale wrote: > Donahue Trevor wrote: > > > > What was that again? I can't hear you. ROFLMBO Couldn't you read it? Maybe you need to change your font colour. -- Neil Bothwick God is real, unless specifically declared integer. pgpWB6SbBqQZs.pgp

[gentoo-user] useflag hell.

I've been running number theory code for a few weeks, so haven't been updating my machine too often... I for the last day or so I'm in a run my "pretendupdate" script, look at the results, decide whether to run ufed or bleep with package.use run the pretendupdate script again, do something

[gentoo-user]

[gentoo-user] Re:

On 28/02/16 21:18, Dale wrote: Donahue Trevor wrote: What was that again? I can't hear you. ROFLMBO Just HTML-only spam :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] useflag hell.

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On a plasma system like you have this will probably cause similar issues > for other packages, so you must iteratively solve those as well till no > more inconsistencies remain. I have a fvwm system. KDE has been the suck since 3.5.x because qt turned to crap with 4.0. --

[gentoo-user] ABI_X86=

Hello, > > so on one system, I run a amd default profile:: [1] default/linux/amd64/13.0 A while back I tested converting the system to only 64 bit libs, then changed it back, so I thought. Several updated where fine. Now quite a few packages are complaining [A]. So looking around is this the

Re: [gentoo-user]

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 13:18:17 -0600, Dale wrote: > >> Donahue Trevor wrote: >>> >> What was that again? I can't hear you. ROFLMBO > Couldn't you read it? Maybe you need to change your font colour. > > Funny you mention that. A long time ago a news article published a

[gentoo-user] Re: beegfs goes opensource!

Andrew Savchenko gentoo.org> writes: > While it is good to have another solution available, I don't see > any real benefits of FhgFS/BeeGFS compared to Lustre these days. > At the time where FhgFS was created, Lustre indeed was unable to > use multiple metadata servers, so this was a