On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:25:14AM +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 06:18:13PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:51:36 +0200
> > Alexander Openkowski wrote:
> >
> > > I have the same problem. Unfortunately, I do not know of
Jorge Almeida wrote:
> I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by
> copying /usr/portage. Is this safe? The point is: does emerge --sync
> just updates the contents of /usr/portage or does it also change
> something else ?
>
> TIA
>
> Jorge Almeida
>
>
This may be a
On 161021-11:04-0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Mick wrote:
> > https://github.com/dirtycow/dirtycow.github.io/wiki/VulnerabilityDetails
>
> Not yet:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597624
>
We are talking grsecurity-patched
On 161024-22:27+0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> On Mon Oct 24 15:49:09 2016, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Why not just share everything via bind mounts in this case? I'd think
> > that would have less overhead than rsync/http and then you're not
> > storing files twice.
>
> Because I have several host
Hey dude, i have acroread installed but use okular since long time ago.
In fact my i was in doubt if acroread still installed. I'll uninstall
acroread, but how to recompile packages without 32-bit ABI? Is there a
smart way or I need to change e recompile each one?
Best regards.
On
On Saturday, October 22, 2016 05:28:22 AM David Haller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Behrouz Khosravi wrote:
> >> $ mplayer foo.mp4 | grep '^VO: '
> >> VO: [gl] ...
> >> $ mpv foo.mp4 | grep '^VO: '
> >> VO: [opengl]
> >>
> >> See 'mplayer -vo help' and 'mpv -vo help'.
> >
> >Thanks.
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 09:30:01 -0700 Daniel Frey wrote:
> So, I was upgrading several machines, and as a habit I always run
> perl-cleaner. Every machine gave me an output like so with somewhat
> different package lists:
>
>
> *
> * It seems like perl-cleaner had to rebuild some packages.
> *
> *
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by
>> copying /usr/portage. Is this safe?
>
> Yes, although ...
>
>> does emerge --sync just updates the
Jorge Almeida wrote:
> I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by
> copying /usr/portage. Is this safe?
Yes, although ...
> does emerge --sync just updates the contents of /usr/portage
portage also changes the content of /var/cache/edb, and in
I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by
copying /usr/portage. Is this safe? The point is: does emerge --sync
just updates the contents of /usr/portage or does it also change
something else ?
TIA
Jorge Almeida
On 2016-10-23, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 23 Oct 2016 21:53:56 Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2016-10-23, Mick wrote:
>> > On Sunday 23 Oct 2016 00:32:02 Grant Edwards wrote:
>> >>
>> >> For the past several years, I've had to keep acroread
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Fernando Rodriguez
> wrote:
>>
>> But a more elegant solution is to emerge app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror and
>> setup your own rsync mirror.
>>
>
> Sure, but it
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Fernando Rodriguez
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> But a more elegant solution is to emerge
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/24/2016 11:35 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>>> Jorge Almeida
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/24/2016 11:35 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>> Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>> I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by
>>>
On Mon Oct 24 10:44:24 2016, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> My use case is basic: 2 home computers, I do emerge et. al. on the
> faster one and produce binary packages to be used on the other one,
> which doesn't even need distfiles, just portage tree plus binary
> packages. I copy stuff between boxes
On Mon Oct 24 15:49:09 2016, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Why not just share everything via bind mounts in this case? I'd think
> that would have less overhead than rsync/http and then you're not
> storing files twice.
Because I have several host boxes and I build the packages on only one.
--
alarig
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
>
> I use a similar setup for LXC containers running over a gentoo box,
> except that my box is setted up to publish the binary packets on a
> specified directory that is accessible via HTTP. My LXCs take the binary
>
Den 24. okt. 2016 17:21, skrev Jorge Almeida:
> I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by
> copying /usr/portage. Is this safe? The point is: does emerge --sync
> just updates the contents of /usr/portage or does it also change
> something else ?
I have one box that I
19 matches
Mail list logo