Re: [gentoo-user] downgrade to x2goserver-4.0.1.22

On 5/5/21 2:01 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I downgrade x2goserver to 4.0.1.22 (to test the speed) > > but when I try to run: "x2godbadmin --createdb" I get an error: > > x2godbadmin --createdb > Can't locate x2gologlevel.pm in @INC (you may need to install the > x2gologlevel module)

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] tar exclude syntax tip

Am Wed, May 05, 2021 at 09:33:58AM -0400 schrieb Walter Dnes: > I'm passing on this solution to help others avoid my frustration and > wasted time. If you've done "RTFM" on tar, you'll find out that "TFM" > is broken or out-of-date or whatever, re: "--exclude=PATTERN". I'm > fighting the urge

[gentoo-user] downgrade to x2goserver-4.0.1.22

I downgrade x2goserver to 4.0.1.22 (to test the speed) but when I try to run: "x2godbadmin --createdb" I get an error: x2godbadmin --createdb Can't locate x2gologlevel.pm in @INC (you may need to install the x2gologlevel module) (@INC contains: /usr/lib/x2go /etc/perl

Re: [gentoo-user] downgrade to x2goserver-4.0.1.22

On Wed, 5 May 2021 14:17:58 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > It seems to me entire directory content is missing after downgrade : > /usr/lib/x2go/ Run qlist x2goserver and you'll see it is now /usr/lib64/x2go. -- Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 5: Twelve-ounce pound cake

Re: [gentoo-user] one machine out of many has nothing to update

Am Wed, May 05, 2021 at 02:24:48PM -0400 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: > On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 20:11 +0200, n952162 wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I update several machines every month.  This month, most of the machines > > needed to update more than 300 packages.  But one, which isn't any > > different

Re: [gentoo-user] downgrade to x2goserver-4.0.1.22

On 5/5/21 3:37 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 5 May 2021 14:17:58 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> It seems to me entire directory content is missing after downgrade : >> /usr/lib/x2go/ > > Run qlist x2goserver and you'll see it is now /usr/lib64/x2go. Thanks Neil, Creating

Re: [gentoo-user] one machine out of many has nothing to update

On 5/5/21 8:24 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 20:11 +0200, n952162 wrote: Hello. I update several machines every month.  This month, most of the machines needed to update more than 300 packages.  But one, which isn't any different than the others, has 0 to update, after

Re: [gentoo-user] one machine out of many has nothing to update

On 5/6/21 7:30 AM, n952162 wrote: On 5/5/21 8:24 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 20:11 +0200, n952162 wrote: Hello. I update several machines every month.  This month, most of the machines needed to update more than 300 packages.  But one, which isn't any different than the

Re: [gentoo-user] new x2goserver - very, very slow

On 5/4/21 10:54 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > In a remote location I've two boxes that run different x2goserver. An older > version of x2goserver-4.0.1.22 is relatively fast and "xfce"-session works OK > stand alone. > > The newer box run: x2goserver-4.1.0.2 > It is painfully slow,

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] tar exclude syntax tip

On 2021-05-05 09:33-0400 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > tar version > > > tar (GNU tar) 1.34 > Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later > . This is free

[gentoo-user] [OT] tar exclude syntax tip

tar version tar (GNU tar) 1.34 Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later . This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] tar exclude syntax tip

On 5/5/21 7:33 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: 3) All directories and/or files to exclude must be listed as relative paths to the directory being tarred, i.e. last parameter on the command line. This might not be very clearly articulated in the manual et al., but once you are aware of it, you see

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] tar exclude syntax tip

On 2021-05-05 15:10+0100 (Nuno Silva) wrote: > On 2021-05-05, tastytea wrote: > > > On 2021-05-05 09:33-0400 "Walter Dnes" > > wrote: > >> tar version > >> > >> > >> tar (GNU tar) 1.34 > >> Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation,

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] tar exclude syntax tip

On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 04:03:03PM +0200, tastytea wrote > > This works fine here with ???tar (GNU tar) 1.34???: > > $ mkdir -p a/b > $ touch a/file a/b/file > $ touch a/file.xz a/b/file.xz > $ tree a > a > ? b > ???   ? file > ???   ? file.xz > ? file > ?

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] tar exclude syntax tip

On 2021-05-05 11:28-0400 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 04:03:03PM +0200, tastytea wrote > > > > This works fine here with ???tar (GNU tar) 1.34???: > > > > $ mkdir -p a/b > > $ touch a/file a/b/file > > $ touch a/file.xz a/b/file.xz > > $ tree a > > a > > ? b > > ???  

[gentoo-user] one machine out of many has nothing to update

Hello. I update several machines every month.  This month, most of the machines needed to update more than 300 packages.  But one, which isn't any different than the others, has 0 to update, after running --sync. Does anybody have an explanation for that?

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] tar exclude syntax tip

On 2021-05-05, tastytea wrote: > On 2021-05-05 09:33-0400 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > >> tar version >> >> >> tar (GNU tar) 1.34 >> Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later >>

Re: [gentoo-user] one machine out of many has nothing to update

On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 20:11 +0200, n952162 wrote: > Hello. > > I update several machines every month.  This month, most of the machines > needed to update more than 300 packages.  But one, which isn't any > different than the others, has 0 to update, after running --sync. > > Does anybody have