On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
> If I cannot trust the tools provided by the OS for finding out whats
> going on-- than what can I trust -- this is intolerable! - if it is
> simply a situation if a non root user not being able to see root
> processes that is one thing, BUT
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, brullo nulla wrote:
> > Most likely you only looked at user cpu % and neglected to list the
> > system and niced times as well.
> >
> > p.s. golden rule: ps lies. top lies. free lies.
> > Don't believe the readings they give, rather interpret them in
> > context.
>
>
Hi guys, i have a web server with IP based virtual hosts (3-4) and i
want to make a ftp account for every host. I'm thinking to use proftpd
and to make the root dir in /var/www so then every user will have home
directory to different web account (/var/www/domain1, /var/www/domain2,
etc.). For the o
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:47:45 +0300, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All of my gentoo systems have both gcc 3.4 and 4.1 but still
use 3.4 for everything except packages that just won't build
with gcc 3.4.
I'm curious what other people are doing. Have most people
switched over to 4.1 as
on Thursday 02/15/2007 Bo Ørsted Andresen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 23:53:10 John covici wrote:
> > > In such a case you should just attach it as a compressed file. But
> > > applying the patch does seem like a good idea. It should be released
> > > later this
I just got Verizon's fios and love the high bandwidth. But I can't get
my gentoo laptop fully connected through a wireless connection. Has
anyone been through this already? Here are the highlights:
- I'm using a Verizon supplied an Actiontec router which includes
wireless and seems to be a
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2007-02-15, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>> I know -- that's what I do now (except the other way around)
>>> for packages that require gcc 4. I just figured I wait to do
>>> the big switch/recompile until I can get rid of 3.4 completely.
>>>
>>> I'll probably j
On 2007-02-15, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I know -- that's what I do now (except the other way around)
>> for packages that require gcc 4. I just figured I wait to do
>> the big switch/recompile until I can get rid of 3.4 completely.
>>
>> I'll probably just do a clean reinstall at that p
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2007-02-14, Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>> I do use Qemu,
>>>
>> Me too but:
>>
>> $ emerge --info
>> Portage 2.1.2-r9 (default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.5-r0,
>> 2.6.19-gentoo-r5 i686)
>> You can use gcc-config to switch t
On 2/14/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 23:53:10 John covici wrote:
> > In such a case you should just attach it as a compressed file. But
> > applying the patch does seem like a good idea. It should be released
> > later this week.
>
> OK, with
On 2007-02-14, Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I do use Qemu,
>
> Me too but:
>
> $ emerge --info
> Portage 2.1.2-r9 (default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.5-r0,
> 2.6.19-gentoo-r5 i686)
> You can use gcc-config to switch to 3.4, compile app-emulation/qemu-softmmu
>
I turned off Preempt Big Kernel Lock earlier today, and haven't had a
deadlock/crash since.
Apparently that solved it.. thanks for the help/support
> I do use Qemu,
Me too but:
$ emerge --info
Portage 2.1.2-r9 (default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.5-r0,
2.6.19-gentoo-r5 i686)
You can use gcc-config to switch to 3.4, compile app-emulation/qemu-softmmu
and then swith to 4.1 again.
Regards,
Norberto
pgpg4NdlbWdbG.pgp
De
On 14 Feb 2007, at 11:41, Mike Williams wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 11:15, Stroller wrote:
I'm looking to deploy a couple of servers for Gentoo use & I'm
wondering if anyone has any recommendations. There requirements for
each are slightly different, but what is in common is that I wa
David Talkington wrote:
> Roy Wright wrote:
>
> > I'm evaluating vmware-server and would like full screen
> > mode to go to just one of my monitors instead of being
> > centered across both monitors.
>
> > If it helps, I'm running twinview 3200x1280 and ~x86.
>
> This seems to be driver-dependent.
on Wednesday 02/14/2007 Bo Ørsted Andresen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 22:16:31 John covici wrote:
> > > In the future do include the actual output of emerge gnome. It is,
> > > however, very likely to be related to bug #166564.
> > >
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:58:58PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I do use Qemu, which was one reason I didn't switch earlier.
Might as well wait. Rumour has that the replacement for dyngen in qemu
is almost ready (the earlier forecast was before end of this month), and
you've already waited this
James wrote:
> Dale exceedtech.net> writes:
>
>
>
>> I'm moving my primary workstation from one system to another.
>> I use seamonkey for web browsing and reading email.
>>
>
>
>
>> is wrong. If it isn't, I'm out of ideas on my end.
>> Hope that helps.
>> Dale
>>
>
> Hello D
On Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2007, Jerry McBride wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 02:48:18 pm Pongrácz István wrote:
> > 2007. 02. 14, szerda keltezéssel 13.28-kor Jerry McBride ezt írta:
> > > I tracked my 100% cpu usage to FAMD... Killing it instantly freed the
> >
> > cpu...
> >
> > Change to
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 03:58:58 pm Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2007-02-14, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --nextPart1799414.yjjTeni5oG
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="utf-8"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> >
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 22:16:31 John covici wrote:
> > In the future do include the actual output of emerge gnome. It is,
> > however, very likely to be related to bug #166564.
> >
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/166564
>
> I did not include the output because it was over 400 lines, maybe I
on Wednesday 02/14/2007 Bo Ørsted Andresen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 18:44:44 John covici wrote:
> > I tried to merge gnome by saying "emerge gnome" today and got an
> > error about circular dependencies from portage. I did a --sync, but
> > no joy. anyone know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Wright wrote:
I'm evaluating vmware-server and would like full screen
mode to go to just one of my monitors instead of being
centered across both monitors.
If it helps, I'm running twinview 3200x1280 and ~x86.
This seems to be driver-dependen
On 2007-02-14, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --nextPart1799414.yjjTeni5oG
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:47:45 Grant Edwards wrote:
>> I'm curious what
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 02:48:18 pm Pongrácz István wrote:
> 2007. 02. 14, szerda keltezéssel 13.28-kor Jerry McBride ezt írta:
> > I tracked my 100% cpu usage to FAMD... Killing it instantly freed the
>
> cpu...
>
> Change to gamin.
> The same function in much better.
> I did it about a year
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:13:44PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I believe there's still at least one package that doesn't build with gcc
> 4.x (kqemu), so there's some reason to still stay on 3.4 if you are
> cautious.
>
You mean qemu-softmmu. kqemu has almost always been compilable by
Grant,
On 15/02/07, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All of my gentoo systems have both gcc 3.4 and 4.1 but still
use 3.4 for everything except packages that just won't build
with gcc 3.4.
I'm curious what other people are doing. Have most people
switched over to 4.1 as their "main" co
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:47:45 Grant Edwards wrote:
> I'm curious what other people are doing. Have most people
> switched over to 4.1 as their "main" compiler?
I did that last May. And not just main but only C compiler (No I don't use
qemu). ;)
--
Bo Andresen
pgpbOl2fmdwY7.pgp
Descr
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] gcc 3.4.6 vs. 4.1.1':
> All of my gentoo systems have both gcc 3.4 and 4.1 but still
> use 3.4 for everything except packages that just won't build
> with gcc 3.4.
>
> I'm curious what other people are doi
I did that while 4.1.1 was still unstable :-P
-Kristian Poul Herkild
-Original Message-
From: Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:47:45 + (UTC)
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] gcc 3.4.6 vs. 4.1.1
>All of my gentoo systems have both gc
All of my gentoo systems have both gcc 3.4 and 4.1 but still
use 3.4 for everything except packages that just won't build
with gcc 3.4.
I'm curious what other people are doing. Have most people
switched over to 4.1 as their "main" compiler?
--
Grant Edwards grante
2007. 02. 14, szerda keltezéssel 13.28-kor Jerry McBride ezt írta:
> I tracked my 100% cpu usage to FAMD... Killing it instantly freed the
cpu...
Change to gamin.
The same function in much better.
I did it about a year ago. (Or less, I don't remember).
It solved me some other problems (CD lock dow
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 18:44:44 John covici wrote:
> I tried to merge gnome by saying "emerge gnome" today and got an
> error about circular dependencies from portage. I did a --sync, but
> no joy. anyone know what is happening?
In the future do include the actual output of emerge gnome.
> I tried to merge gnome by saying "emerge gnome" today and got an
> error about circular dependencies from portage. I did a --sync, but
> no joy. anyone know what is happening?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147127?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:31:31 -0500
"Timothy A. Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I cannot trust the tools provided by the OS for finding out whats
> going on-- than what can I trust -- this is intolerable! - if it is
> simply a situation if a non root user not being able to see root
> p
-Original Message-
From: Hemmann, Volker Armin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:14 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 100% CPU usage with no processes to blame?
On Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2007, brullo nulla wrote:
> > Most likely
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 12:25:27 pm brullo nulla wrote:
> > Most likely you only looked at user cpu % and neglected to list the
> > system and niced times as well.
> >
> > p.s. golden rule: ps lies. top lies. free lies.
> > Don't believe the readings they give, rather interpret them in contex
On Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2007, brullo nulla wrote:
> > Most likely you only looked at user cpu % and neglected to list the
> > system and niced times as well.
> >
> > p.s. golden rule: ps lies. top lies. free lies.
> > Don't believe the readings they give, rather interpret them in context.
>
> sob.
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:44 -0500, John covici wrote:
> I tried to merge gnome by saying "emerge gnome" today and got an
> error about circular dependencies from portage. I did a --sync, but
> no joy. anyone know what is happening?
When you get an error, please post the actual error, else nothi
On 14 February 2007 18:55, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Grant wrote:
> > I just sat through about 5 minutes of 100% CPU usage and a thrashing
> > hard disk. I ran top and it reported 0% idle CPU, but the list of
> > processes totaled maybe 20% CPU usage. How can this be?
I tried to merge gnome by saying "emerge gnome" today and got an
error about circular dependencies from portage. I did a --sync, but
no joy. anyone know what is happening?
Thanks.
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covi
Most likely you only looked at user cpu % and neglected to list the
system and niced times as well.
p.s. golden rule: ps lies. top lies. free lies.
Don't believe the readings they give, rather interpret them in context.
sob. it's not the first time I hear this. What should I believe to
really k
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Pongrácz István wrote:
> I had the same experience, when I turned on the 'DMA engine' option
> in the kernel config (from 2.6.18.x)
> I disabled it and after it everything are working fine.
That's interesting. I've wondered what that option is since it came out,
as
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Grant wrote:
> I just sat through about 5 minutes of 100% CPU usage and a thrashing
> hard disk. I ran top and it reported 0% idle CPU, but the list of
> processes totaled maybe 20% CPU usage. How can this be?
>
> - Grant
Most likely you only looked at user cpu % a
I just sat through about 5 minutes of 100% CPU usage and a thrashing
hard disk. I ran top and it reported 0% idle CPU, but the list of
processes totaled maybe 20% CPU usage. How can this be?
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Dale exceedtech.net> writes:
> I'm moving my primary workstation from one system to another.
> I use seamonkey for web browsing and reading email.
> is wrong. If it isn't, I'm out of ideas on my end.
> Hope that helps.
> Dale
Hello Dale,
I had to first creat identical mail folders on
I had the same experience, when I turned on the 'DMA engine' option in
the kernel config (from 2.6.18.x)
I disabled it and after it everything are working fine.
István
2007. 02. 14, szerda keltezéssel 15.30-kor Ivan Lucian Aron ezt írta:
>
>
> On 2/14/07, Hemmann, Volker Armin
> <[EMAIL PROTEC
On 14/02/07, Ivan Lucian Aron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't tried vanilla sources
Fair enough, let's see where the problem seems to be, anyway.
So wait for it to lock again, and check the kernel tasks with
sysrq-t / echo t >/proc/sysrq-trigger.
Will get back as soon as I get more info.
On 2/14/07, Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2007, Ivan Lucian Aron wrote:
> On 2/14/07, Duane Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SysRq-t? Sorry can't find it in portage, can you explain please?
less /usr/src/linux/Documentation/sysrq.txt
--
gentoo-
On Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2007, Ivan Lucian Aron wrote:
> On 2/14/07, Duane Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SysRq-t? Sorry can't find it in portage, can you explain please?
less /usr/src/linux/Documentation/sysrq.txt
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Just tried disabling Preemt Big Kernel Lock, and Voluntary Preept
I read somewhere that X2 Users should disable it.. So i'm currently waiting
to see if locks still happen..
On 2/14/07, Duane Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14/02/07, Ivan Lucian Aron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lately since my fresh gentoo install, i've been having a lot of problems
> with the kernel locking up at random.
> It's not a hard lockup, or a panic crash, it just stops running new
>
On 2/14/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Ivan Lucian Aron wrote:
> Lately since my fresh gentoo install, i've been having a lot of
> problems with the kernel locking up at random.
> It's not a hard lockup, or a panic crash, it just stops running new
> p
On 14/02/07, Ivan Lucian Aron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lately since my fresh gentoo install, i've been having a lot of problems
with the kernel locking up at random.
It's not a hard lockup, or a panic crash, it just stops running new
processes, i get a lot of defuncts.. and dosn't let new users
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Ivan Lucian Aron wrote:
> Lately since my fresh gentoo install, i've been having a lot of
> problems with the kernel locking up at random.
> It's not a hard lockup, or a panic crash, it just stops running new
> processes, i get a lot of defuncts.. and dosn't let new u
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 11:15, Stroller wrote:
> I'm looking to deploy a couple of servers for Gentoo use & I'm
> wondering if anyone has any recommendations. There requirements for
> each are slightly different, but what is in common is that I want
> hotswap SATA hard-drives (a simple
Lately since my fresh gentoo install, i've been having a lot of problems
with the kernel locking up at random.
It's not a hard lockup, or a panic crash, it just stops running new
processes, i get a lot of defuncts.. and dosn't let new users log in at all,
sudo/su-ing either.
I've checked everythi
Hi there,
I'm looking to deploy a couple of servers for Gentoo use & I'm
wondering if anyone has any recommendations. There requirements for
each are slightly different, but what is in common is that I want
hotswap SATA hard-drives (a simple mirror RAID is probably fine) & PSUs.
Backgroun
Howdy,
I'm evaluating vmware-server and would like full screen
mode to go to just one of my monitors instead of being
centered across both monitors.
If it helps, I'm running twinview 3200x1280 and ~x86.
TIA,
Roy
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
59 matches
Mail list logo