Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} wengophone-like or skype-like SIP service?

2008-01-04 Thread Randy Barlow
Grant wrote: > Apparently I'm out of luck as far as using skype or wengophone on a > hardened profile. Is there are kind of a similar service available > that would work on a hardened amd64 system? I understand that I can > use a client like sjphone and connect it to any sip service, but I > like

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox update results in Yahoo request for newer version

2008-01-04 Thread Walter Dnes
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 06:47:42AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote >I don't think it's Yahoo. I think it's Gentoo 32-bit. > >My desktop machine is Gentoo 64-bit using 2.0.0.11 and it's working > perfectly fine. I wonder if it's because Yahoo is checking for user-agent. They may allow Firefox

[gentoo-user] Re: Suddenly emerging unstable packages = why?

2008-01-04 Thread Sven Köhler
Suddenly I noticed I'm on the bleeding edge. I don't know why. The latest: emerge -aDvu world is emerging unstable k3b-1.0.4. At least if I'm reading the output of eix correctly, it's unstable. I don't have anything in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS (it's not defined). In all of /etc/portage there are 4 refere

Re: [gentoo-user] Suddenly emerging unstable packages = why?

2008-01-04 Thread Dale
Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > Suddenly I noticed I'm on the bleeding edge. I don't know why. > The latest: emerge -aDvu world is emerging unstable k3b-1.0.4. At > least if I'm reading the output of eix correctly, it's unstable. > I don't have anything in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS (it's not defined). > In all of

[gentoo-user] Suddenly emerging unstable packages = why?

2008-01-04 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
Suddenly I noticed I'm on the bleeding edge. I don't know why. The latest: emerge -aDvu world is emerging unstable k3b-1.0.4. At least if I'm reading the output of eix correctly, it's unstable. I don't have anything in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS (it's not defined). In all of /etc/portage there are 4 referen

Re: [gentoo-user] Need ebuild no longer in Portage

2008-01-04 Thread Renat Golubchyk
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:01:44 -0800 Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know if there is a way to prevent eclean from removing a > distfile for an installed package. Seems like that should be default > behavior. From the eclean manpage: If you use the --destructive option, eclean will o

[gentoo-user] {OT} wengophone-like or skype-like SIP service?

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
Apparently I'm out of luck as far as using skype or wengophone on a hardened profile. Is there are kind of a similar service available that would work on a hardened amd64 system? I understand that I can use a client like sjphone and connect it to any sip service, but I like seeing my prepaid fund

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Need ebuild no longer in Portage

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
> >> ISTR that "make prepare" isn't sufficient. You have to do a > >> "make". IIRC, you can kill it once it starts compiling "real > >> code". > > > > I can't keep up with the acronyms > > I seem to recall. :) > > > but I did a full make and I still get the same error. Should > > I be booted int

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Need ebuild no longer in Portage

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
> >> ISTR that "make prepare" isn't sufficient. You have to do a > >> "make". IIRC, you can kill it once it starts compiling "real > >> code". > > > > I can't keep up with the acronyms > > I seem to recall. :) > > > but I did a full make and I still get the same error. Should > > I be booted int

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Need ebuild no longer in Portage

2008-01-04 Thread Dale
Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2008-01-04, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> ISTR that "make prepare" isn't sufficient. You have to do a >>> "make". IIRC, you can kill it once it starts compiling "real >>> code". >>> >> I can't keep up with the acronyms >> > > I seem to recall. :

[gentoo-user] unable to emerge anything...

2008-01-04 Thread Richard Torres
I'm getting pretty much the same error (C compiler cannot create executables). I'm pretty sure it's because gcc-3.3.4 is installed. I've tried upgrading gcc by emerging but get the same error (catch-22 situation). Here's the last part of the error log which is the same with anything I try to em

[gentoo-user] Re: Need ebuild no longer in Portage

2008-01-04 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2008-01-04, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ISTR that "make prepare" isn't sufficient. You have to do a >> "make". IIRC, you can kill it once it starts compiling "real >> code". > > I can't keep up with the acronyms I seem to recall. :) > but I did a full make and I still get the same e

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox update results in Yahoo request for newer version

2008-01-04 Thread kashani
Mark Knecht wrote: Yeah, my wife's 32-bit machine is still blocked. My son's 32-bit machine which hasn't been updated yet is still fine as is my 64-bit machine. Logically so far I do think it's a Gentoo problem. If it was specific to some Yahoo server that my house is pointed at it would have be

Re: [gentoo-user] Card reader only works if booted with card in

2008-01-04 Thread Dan Farrell
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:39:33 +0100 "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2008, Grant wrote: > > My card reader works if an SD card is inserted when the system is > > booted. If the card is inserted after the system is already booted, > > /dev/mmcblk0 never a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Need ebuild no longer in Portage

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
> >> > > * nvidia missing in FILESDIR > >> > > > >> > > Can anyone tell what happened? > >> > > > >> > You probably copied the ebuild, but not the contents of the files/ > >> > subdirectory. It probably needs some patch that lived there. So you > >> > need to copy that directory along with its c

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6.24 config options

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
> > > > Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a > > > > recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv > > > > gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9. > > > > > > But Grant is trying to use vanilla-sources. > > > > Exactly. Last I checked vanilla, git, and mm have > > 2.6.24 availabl

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6.24 config options

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
> > > Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a > > > recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv > > > gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9. > > > > But Grant is trying to use vanilla-sources. > > > > same thing: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ emerge -pv vanilla-sources > > These are t

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6.24 config options

2008-01-04 Thread maxim wexler
--- Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:45:32 -0800 (PST), maxim > wexler wrote: > > > Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a > > recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv > > gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9. > > But Grant is trying to use

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6.24 config options

2008-01-04 Thread maxim wexler
--- Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a > > > recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv > > > gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9. > > > > But Grant is trying to use vanilla-sources. > > Exactly. Last I checked vanilla, git, and m

[gentoo-user] Re: Need ebuild no longer in Portage

2008-01-04 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2008-01-04, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > * nvidia missing in FILESDIR >> > > >> > > Can anyone tell what happened? >> > > >> > You probably copied the ebuild, but not the contents of the files/ >> > subdirectory. It probably needs some patch that lived there. So you >> > need to co

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean question

2008-01-04 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Friday 04 January 2008, Dale wrote: > >> 4.5.20_p satisfies all those listed DEPENDs, so it's OK to let >> depclean do what it wants. >> >> alan >> >> >> >> I wouldn't say to do this for important stuff like Python or Perl >> but I usually let depclean do its thing, as

Re: [gentoo-user] Need ebuild no longer in Portage

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
> > > * nvidia missing in FILESDIR > > > > > > Can anyone tell what happened? > > > > > You probably copied the ebuild, but not the contents of the files/ > > subdirectory. It probably needs some patch that lived there. So you > > need to copy that directory along with its contents to the same p

Re: [gentoo-user] Need ebuild no longer in Portage

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
> > * nvidia missing in FILESDIR > > > > Can anyone tell what happened? > > > You probably copied the ebuild, but not the contents of the files/ > subdirectory. It probably needs some patch that lived there. So you > need to copy that directory along with its contents to the same place > you cop

Re: [gentoo-user] Need ebuild no longer in Portage

2008-01-04 Thread Jesús Guerrero
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:58:52 -0800 Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * nvidia missing in FILESDIR > > Can anyone tell what happened? > You probably copied the ebuild, but not the contents of the files/ subdirectory. It probably needs some patch that lived there. So you need to copy that direc

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB Wireless Network Adapter?

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
> Actually i'm using vanilla-sources just for rt73usb driver. > I've Gentoo 64Bit too. > Before i used Gentoo-Sources. > I just copy my .config from Gentoo Sources to Vanilla Sources and i have > no issue (since 2 month). Nice, we're doing the same thing then. Did you place the firmware in /lib/f

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB Wireless Network Adapter?

2008-01-04 Thread TimeBreach
Actually i'm using vanilla-sources just for rt73usb driver. I've Gentoo 64Bit too. Before i used Gentoo-Sources. I just copy my .config from Gentoo Sources to Vanilla Sources and i have no issue (since 2 month). Grant a écrit : >> I'm using ASUS WL-167g USB WLAN (rt73usb) and work well with or wit

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean question

2008-01-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 04 January 2008, Dale wrote: > 4.5.20_p satisfies all those listed DEPENDs, so it's OK to let > depclean do what it wants. > > alan > > > > I wouldn't say to do this for important stuff like Python or Perl > but I usually let depclean do its thing, as long as it is not a > critical packa

Re: [gentoo-user] Extracting XP drivers from an .exe

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
> > search the hard > > drive for any files that were unpacked - you might find where it > > unpacked files and, if you're lucky, it might contain all contents - > > 32 bit and 64 bit. > > > > Yes, and they would probably be located in the %TEMP% directory. I was just using the Windows search. -

Re: [gentoo-user] Extracting XP drivers from an .exe

2008-01-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Mestelan
On 03/01/2008, James Ausmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > search the hard > drive for any files that were unpacked - you might find where it > unpacked files and, if you're lucky, it might contain all contents - > 32 bit and 64 bit. > Yes, and they would probably be located in the %TEMP% directory.

Re: [gentoo-user] Extracting XP drivers from an .exe

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
> There is one of the greatest tools at windows you need now: > > http://legroom.net/software/uniextract > > With this tools you can extract everything which can be extractet. Have > fun with it!! Luckily I have my USB wireless adapter working with Linux drivers so I don't need to use ndiswrapper,

Re: [gentoo-user] Need ebuild no longer in Portage

2008-01-04 Thread Grant
> Also, gentoo has an "attic" where all older ebuilds are archived. You > can grab the ebuild and any related files and use your local overlay to > keep it around for as long as you need. > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/x11-drivers/ > > There are nvidia-drivers and a legacy bra

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean question

2008-01-04 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Friday 04 January 2008, Mick wrote: > >> It shows these versions of db: >> >> sys-libs/db >> selected: 1.85-r3 4.1.25_p1-r4 4.2.52_p4-r2 4.3.29-r2 >>protected: none >> omitted: 4.5.20_p >> >> while equery shows: >> >> # equery depends sys-libs/db >> [ Searc

Re: [gentoo-user] depclean question

2008-01-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 04 January 2008, Mick wrote: > It shows these versions of db: > > sys-libs/db > selected: 1.85-r3 4.1.25_p1-r4 4.2.52_p4-r2 4.3.29-r2 >protected: none > omitted: 4.5.20_p > > while equery shows: > > # equery depends sys-libs/db > [ Searching for packages depending on sys-libs

[gentoo-user] depclean question

2008-01-04 Thread Mick
It shows these versions of db: sys-libs/db selected: 1.85-r3 4.1.25_p1-r4 4.2.52_p4-r2 4.3.29-r2 protected: none omitted: 4.5.20_p while equery shows: # equery depends sys-libs/db [ Searching for packages depending on sys-libs/db... ] dev-lang/perl-5.8.8-r4 (berkdb? sys-libs/db)

Re: [gentoo-user] Extracting XP drivers from an .exe

2008-01-04 Thread Justin
There is one of the greatest tools at windows you need now: http://legroom.net/software/uniextract With this tools you can extract everything which can be extractet. Have fun with it!! Grant schrieb: >>> Can anyone think of a way to extract the XP 64-bit drivers I know are >>> in an .exe