Hello folks!
I know that this question is offtopic for this list, but maybe
someone has a clue nonetheless...
I'm trying to access my local X display (on a Gentoo Linux machine,
of course - am I now on topic? *G*) from a remote system (running
Solaris 10U4 on Sparc). I cannot use ssh to login to
Hello,
I had a raid1/mirror array of two 200G disks. Then one failed and I
thought 'lets get two 500G disks and just ease them in, they are cheap'.
So I added the full 500G partition from the first disk to the degraded
array, watched the resync, removed the remaining 200G disk and added the
last 5
On Feb 5, 2008 2:47 PM, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dale wrote on 05/02/08 22:44:
> >>> hp-setup stubbornly refuses to acknowledge /dev/lp0
> >>> Please check that you have USE=parport enabled for hplip
>
> >>> Thanks for the help. I did find that hplip was compiled without th
On Feb 6, 2008 9:13 AM, Arnau Bria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to comoile zd1211 and it always complain about
> CONFIG_NET_RADIO:
> * Checking for suitable kernel configuration options...
> * zd1211-85 requires support for Wireless LAN drivers (non-hamradio) &
> Wireless Ex
I have no sound in mythfrontend anymore. Here's the emerge information:
camille ~ # emerge -pv mythtv
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] media-tv/mythtv-0.20.2_p14972 USE="alsa dvb dvd ivtv
jack joystick lirc mmx opengl perl
>
> Digests in the portage tree are an old obsolete feature that has just
> recently finally been removed from the tree. Now gentoo uses a much
> better Manifest scheme. 'ebuild digest has done nothing
> for quite some time now (at least a full year maybe?), and the manifest
> option is the one th
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 05:46 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I'm currently developing an synthetic filesystem for audio mixer
> control. It does all the OS/driver specific stuff within the
> fileserver, so applications can acces the mixer settings in an
> completely platform agnost
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:36 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 February 2008 20:18:10 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > Submit a bug at b.g.o. as normal. The worst that can happen is that
> > jakub will trash them WONTFIX.
>
> OK, I will - thanks. I was feeling inhibited by the virtual lack
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 10:33 -0200, Ale wrote:
> HI! well that is is there any way yo tweak this startup script so they
> can look just the same as the other services?
> I want a single line with OK or something similar, just like the other
> services, not many lines in the console.
for a start, w
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 February 2008 20:18:10 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Submit a bug at b.g.o. as normal. The worst that can happen is that
> > jakub will trash them WONTFIX.
>
> OK, I will - thanks. I was feeling inhibited by the virtual lack of
> oth
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:42:49 +, Mick wrote:
> I haven't been able to connect to it at all today. I remember reading
> that the server had been cracked a couple of months ago and have been
> wondering if we have a repeat performance here. I also have not been
> able to connect to http://www.ge
I haven't been able to connect to it at all today. I remember reading that
the server had been cracked a couple of months ago and have been wondering if
we have a repeat performance here. I also have not been able to connect to
http://www.gentoo-portage.com/ . . .
As an aside, a number of gen
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 20:18:10 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Submit a bug at b.g.o. as normal. The worst that can happen is that
> jakub will trash them WONTFIX.
OK, I will - thanks. I was feeling inhibited by the virtual lack of other
bugs there, where I'd expected to see hundreds.
--
Rgds
P
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> After reading last month's thread on kde-4 I decided to have a go,
> but I wanted a separate setup for simplicity. So I built a basic
> system from 2007.0 on a new partition and installed the first few
> kde-4 packages (startkde, kdm, konsole a
Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:03:01 -0500
> schrieb "Benjamen R. Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> My system has two sound-cards - one on the motherboard (snd_intel8x0)
>> and an one via PCI (SB Audigy/snd_emu10k1). I don't mind having the
>> driver compiled for the snd_intel8x0 card,
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, James wrote:
> Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> > Or you could
> > run 'ebuild /usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox/busybox-
> > manifest' to regenerate a Manifest yourself.
>
> Well I googled and tried this:
>
> ebuild busybox.ebuild digest
>
> to no avail
>
> Now I trie
After reading last month's thread on kde-4 I decided to have a go, but I
wanted a separate setup for simplicity. So I built a basic system from
2007.0 on a new partition and installed the first few kde-4 packages
(startkde, kdm, konsole and a few others).
Now I want to submit a bug report, but
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> Or you could
> run 'ebuild /usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox/busybox-
> manifest' to regenerate a Manifest yourself.
Well I googled and tried this:
ebuild busybox.ebuild digest
to no avail
Now I tried:
ebuild /usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox/busybox-1.7.4.ebuil
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, James wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just 'emerge --sync' as system, then proceeded to start a normal
> update.
>
> I get this error:
>
> Verifying ebuild Manifests...
>
> !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found:
> /usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox/busybox-1.4.1-r2.ebu
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:48:14 + (UTC), James wrote:
> Verifying ebuild Manifests...
>
> !!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found:
> /usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox/busybox-1.4.1-r2.ebuild
Wait a couple of hours and sync again. If it still happens, file a bug
report.
--
Neil Bothwi
Hello
I just 'emerge --sync' as system, then proceeded to start a normal
update.
I get this error:
Verifying ebuild Manifests...
!!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found:
/usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox/busybox-1.4.1-r2.ebuild
So I looked in /usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox and saw:
Am Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:03:01 -0500
schrieb "Benjamen R. Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My system has two sound-cards - one on the motherboard (snd_intel8x0)
> and an one via PCI (SB Audigy/snd_emu10k1). I don't mind having the
> driver compiled for the snd_intel8x0 card, but I want the Audigy as my
2008/2/6, Dan Dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tuesday 05 February 2008 06:20:25 pm Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
> > What i can do so that the kernel module iwl3945 don't be autoload at the
> > boot ?
> >
> > He is not on module.autoload.d/kernel ...
> >
> > I have many modules (Alsa,nvidia,uvcvideo) whi
My system has two sound-cards - one on the motherboard (snd_intel8x0)
and an one via PCI (SB Audigy/snd_emu10k1). I don't mind having the
driver compiled for the snd_intel8x0 card, but I want the Audigy as my
default card chosen for playback.
Some applications (e.g. Rosegarden) let me select the c
Hi,
I'm trying to comoile zd1211 and it always complain about
CONFIG_NET_RADIO:
* Checking for suitable kernel configuration options...
* zd1211-85 requires support for Wireless LAN drivers (non-hamradio) &
Wireless Extensions (CONFIG_NET_RADIO).
* Please check to make sure these options are
> I have been thinking of going to x86_64 mode but I'm wondering if
> it's worth the trouble with multilib, chroot'ing, firefox-bin and other
> compromises (admittedly some minor). I realize I should see some speed
> increase but probably only in certain areas such as compiling.
>
I just switched
HI! well that is is there any way yo tweak this startup script so they can
look just the same as the other services?
I want a single line with OK or something similar, just like the other
services, not many lines in the console.
Any help is much appreciated. Cheers!
Jan Seeger schreef:
Yeah, it seems nspluginwrapper works better now. The time I tried it, it just
crashed with a
segfault and did nothing. But installing it again, it seems to work. Thanks for
your suggestion^^
I have used it before but because of some strange crashes. After that
I've never
On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Jan Seeger wrote:
> Yeah, it seems nspluginwrapper works better now. The time I tried it, it
> just crashed with a segfault and did nothing. But installing it again, it
> seems to work. Thanks for your suggestion^^ --
> thenybble.de/blog/ -- four bits at a time
I on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 06. Feb, Volker Armin Hemmann spammed my inbox with
> On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Jan Seeger wrote:
> > On Wed, 06. Feb, Volker Armin Hemmann spammed my inbox with
> >
> >
> > > not needed anymore either. flash does work in the 'normal' fir
On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Jan Seeger wrote:
> On Wed, 06. Feb, Volker Armin Hemmann spammed my inbox with
>
>
> > not needed anymore either. flash does work in the 'normal' firefox just
> > fine.
>
> Come again? I would be very glad to finally ditch the binary firefox, but
> using nspluginwrap
On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 3:03 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 2008 2:22 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 06. Feb, Volker Armin Hemmann spammed my inbox with
> not needed anymore either. flash does work in the 'normal' firefox just fine.
Come again? I would be very glad to finally ditch the binary firefox, but using
nspluginwrapper
didn't work.
On Feb 6, 2008 3:03 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2008 2:22 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > [1] http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/
> >
> > By the way, *right now* I'm us
On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 2:22 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > [1] http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/
>
> By the way, *right now* I'm using Firefox in 64 bits, because YouTube
> now works with swfdec.
emm, 'normal' flash
On Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> I have an AMD 64x2 that I have been using only in x86 mode since I got
> it. I have been thinking of going to x86_64 mode but I'm wondering if
> it's worth the trouble with multilib
which trouble?
> , chroot'ing,
never needed.
> firefox
Anthony E. Caudel schreef:
I have an AMD 64x2 that I have been using only in x86 mode since I got
it. I have been thinking of going to x86_64 mode but I'm wondering if
it's worth the trouble with multilib, chroot'ing, firefox-bin and other
compromises (admittedly some minor). I realize I should
Hi!
> What i can do so that the kernel module iwl3945 don't be autoload at the
> boot ?
But this line in:
/etc/hotplug/blacklist.d/anyname:
#don't load this module automaticly
blacklist iwl3945
Best regards,
Magnus
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Feb 6, 2008 2:22 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> [1] http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/
By the way, *right now* I'm using Firefox in 64 bits, because YouTube
now works with swfdec.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM
On Feb 6, 2008 1:28 AM, Anthony E. Caudel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> So, for those users who have used both, is it worth it overall?
I've been using amd64 two years now, and the only 32 bit applications
that *I* use are firefox-bin and mplayer-bin. With swfdec[1] getting
better and better,
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 06:20:25 pm Elyahou ITTAH wrote:
> What i can do so that the kernel module iwl3945 don't be autoload at the
> boot ?
>
> He is not on module.autoload.d/kernel ...
>
> I have many modules (Alsa,nvidia,uvcvideo) which are loaded automaticaly
> but i don't know why...
>
> I
41 matches
Mail list logo