> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 7:12 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: [gentoo-user] [OT vmware] Networking Gentoo as guest on vista
>
> I'm hoping some of you here have run gentoo on a
Am Donnerstag, 1. Mai 2008 schrieb ext de Almeida, Valmor F.:
> Hello,
>
> I am compiling a vanilla-sources 2.6.24.4 kernel (2008.0_beta2 minimal
> install) and no matter what I do to disable scsi support I end up with a
> scsi module (scsi_wait_scan.mod) after compilation. When looking at the
> .c
> # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 restart
> * ERROR: net.eth0 has been stopped by something else
>
> # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start
> * WARNING: net.eth0 has already been started
>
> meantime netstat indicates no changes at all.. eth0 is up throughout.
Do this;
/etc/init.d/net.eth0 stop
- verify the int
> I thought I remembered someway to compile a single module after the
> fact that didn't involve recompiling everthing... but just now I
> entered the usr/src/linux directory and edited .config adding the
> sshfs FUSE module.
>
> when I ran `make' I see it grinding thru the whole thing again. Is
Have you logged out and back in since becoming a member of the
wireshark group? A quick way to test without having to log out and
back in would be to Ctrl-Alt-F2 (or whatever) over to a virtual
terminal and log in there, and then try to run the command. If that
works, of course, you just need to lo
I must say once again I'm deeply impressed and thankful for the folks
at Gentoo. My Windows Vista laptop has taken a dump. I'm reasonably
sure the hardware is OK but like everything M$ you pile on driver
after driver, virus protection and firewalls, junk after junk after
junk, and finally the darn
Following the instructions here, I tried to create an updated ebuild for
mozilla-thunderbird-bin. The newest version is 2.0.0.14; current ebuild
is 2.0.0.12.
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Create_an_Updated_Ebuild
Everything worked fine until I tried to update the hashes in the manifest,
ebuild
-Original Message-
>From: Bob Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 10:03 AM
>To: Gentoo-user List
>Subject: [gentoo-user] Wireshark won't run except as root
> I've emerged wireshark, and made myself a member of both the wireshark
> group, and the tcpdump group,
Albert Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So what is the correct procedure here?
>
> Did you try
>
> # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 zap
It has no effect whatsoever:
root # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 zap
* Manually resetting net.eth0 to stopped state
(In fact it is not stopped I can ping www.gentoo)
On Freitag, 2. Mai 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
> Hello Gentoo users,
>
> I'm trying to enable smb:// support for Krusader. Searching the net I got a
> solution: I have to emerge kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves. (on Ubuntu I had to
> install a very similarly named package to do this).
>
> But unfortunate
Sorry, I hit the send button by accident.
I think all you have to do is to enable the samba USE flag when emerging kde.
You can append the line:
kde-base/kdebase samba
to /etc/portage/package.use
to accomplish that
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Just the "samba" USE flag when emerging kde.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Hello Gentoo users,
I'm trying to enable smb:// support for Krusader. Searching the net I got a
solution: I have to emerge kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves. (on Ubuntu I had to
install a very similarly named package to do this).
But unfortunately doing this isnt a good idea, because:
lapitopi gyuszk #
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:12:19PM +0200, Wolf Canis wrote:
> Michael George wrote:
> |
> | It was /etc/man-conf. A change in the NROFF definition caused the
> | problem. Running dispatch-conf didn't prompt me for the config change,
> | so I ran etc-update this time and found it.
> |
> | Hopefull
On Thu, 1 May 2008 22:41:23 +0100, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> > Implication? I obviously wasn't clear enough ;-)
>
> You were very clear. Some time ago, I offered you a Hansa Draught for
> some help if you ever happened to come to Windhoek. That offer is
> void now, and I'll drink the pint myself. Tr
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 23:21 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I've seen similar messages a few times on my boxes recently, but each
> time the emerge got going again after a short while. So I never really
> bothered finding out exactly what is going on.
I believe portage recently switched to using p
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 16:47 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After updating to 2008 pkgset after merging openrc I lost the
> net.eth0 link.. I see other have seen this and even at least 2 bug
> reports but the cure is said to be recreating by hand.
>
> I find that not to work... DETAILS:
>
> Fi
After updating to 2008 pkgset after merging openrc I lost the
net.eth0 link.. I see other have seen this and even at least 2 bug
reports but the cure is said to be recreating by hand.
I find that not to work... DETAILS:
First, net.lo is itself a symlink to /lib/rc/sh/net.sh, so I'm
creating a sy
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 1 May 2008 15:13:27 -0400, Brandon Mintern wrote:
> > I was mostly responding to Neil Bothwick's implication (even if
> > it was sarcastic) that using vim indicates bad things.
>
> Implication? I obviously wasn't clear enough ;-)
You were ver
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In the middle of doing a major upgrade from very old pkgs to
> > current 2008 and compiling lots and lots of stuff.
> >
> > Seeing that line `checking for WHATEVER' go by 486,211 times so
> > far m
On Thursday 01 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ctrl-C to kill the emerge and
> > rm /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/.udev-120.portage_lockfile
>
> Egad and how many times have done that in other situations...
>
> I tried emerge -vC udev followed by emerge
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are expecting autoconf to actually do something sane when it runs???
>
> Har har.
> You must be new here.
hehe... no not new... you'd never know it by the questions I ask but
I've been running linux since redhat 3 series circa 1995-6 or so.
I proba
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 1 May 2008 15:13:27 -0400, Brandon Mintern wrote:
> > I was mostly responding to Neil Bothwick's implication (even if
> > it was sarcastic) that using vim indicates bad things.
>
> Implication? I obviously wasn't clear enough ;-)
Hey, watch i
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Brandon Mintern wrote:
> I was mostly responding to Neil Bothwick's implication (even if
> it was sarcastic) that using vim indicates bad things.
Hey Neil,
Looks like we caught one - a big fish this time :-) :-)
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
--
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ctrl-C to kill the emerge and
> rm /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/.udev-120.portage_lockfile
Egad and how many times have done that in other situations...
I tried emerge -vC udev followed by emerge -v udev
No help
Its just udev-120 that does this.
Before
On Thursday 01 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In the middle of doing a major upgrade from very old pkgs to current
> 2008 and compiling lots and lots of stuff.
>
> Seeing that line `checking for WHATEVER' go by 486,211 times so far
> makes me wonder if there wouldn't be someway to cache all t
On Thursday 01 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> waiting for lock on
> /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/.udev-120.portage_lockfile
>
> And has been there a good while.
>
> Looking at the bugs I see it mentioned but says it was fixed quite
> sometime ago.
>
> Any suggestions of how to get past this ite
updating from an old 2006 pkg based install to latest 2008 and have
gotten pretty far along... right now emerging udev in an
emerge -vuDN system
command.
The emerge is hung at:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-120 [087-r1] USE="(-selinux)" 0 kB
Total: 1 pac
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 21:33 +0100, Robert Bridge wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 15:25 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> > I looked it up and found the file. The Exec line was
> > gnome-cups-manager. Should gnome-cups-manager have some visible GUI,
> > because it doesn't. When I run it at the ter
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 15:25 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> I looked it up and found the file. The Exec line was
> gnome-cups-manager. Should gnome-cups-manager have some visible GUI,
> because it doesn't. When I run it at the terminal prompt, it just gives
> me a blinking cursor until I Cntrl+
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 22:22 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 01 May 2008 14:12:38 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote:
>
> > I unmerged gtk-doc and ran my command again. Now it wants to install
> > gtk-doc, but it's still blocked:
> >
> > catherine ~ # emerge -av =gtk+-2.12.9-r2
> >
> > These a
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 22:00 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> 2008/5/1 Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > In gnome-2.20.3, how would I find out what Main
> > Menu->System->Administration->Printing tries to run? And where would
> > errors from attempting to run it be dumped to? When I run
On Thu, 01 May 2008 14:12:38 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> I unmerged gtk-doc and ran my command again. Now it wants to install
> gtk-doc, but it's still blocked:
>
> catherine ~ # emerge -av =gtk+-2.12.9-r2
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependen
On Thu, 1 May 2008 15:13:27 -0400, Brandon Mintern wrote:
> I was mostly responding to Neil Bothwick's implication (even if
> it was sarcastic) that using vim indicates bad things.
Implication? I obviously wasn't clear enough ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
Just got a new car for my wifeGreat Trade!
2008/5/1 Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In gnome-2.20.3, how would I find out what Main
> Menu->System->Administration->Printing tries to run? And where would
> errors from attempting to run it be dumped to? When I run it, it fails
> silently.
You can try to find out which desktop fi
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:11 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the middle of doing a major upgrade from very old pkgs to current
> 2008 and compiling lots and lots of stuff.
>
> Seeing that line `checking for WHATEVER' go by 486,211 times so far
> makes me wonder if there wouldn't be someway t
yes
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 2:14 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I remembered someway to compile a single module after the
> fact that didn't involve recompiling everthing... but just now I
> entered the usr/src/linux directory and edited .config adding the
> sshfs FUSE module.
>
> when
I thought I remembered someway to compile a single module after the
fact that didn't involve recompiling everthing... but just now I
entered the usr/src/linux directory and edited .config adding the
sshfs FUSE module.
when I ran `make' I see it grinding thru the whole thing again. Is
that normal
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:06 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Brandon Mintern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Call me old school, but that method never takes me more than a few
> > minutes to do. I am also someone in the vim camp. It fires up quickly
>
> Unless you are updating a vmappliance
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 14:25 -0400, John covici wrote:
> on Thursday 05/01/2008 Michael Sullivan([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> > I'm trying to install a package that is being blocked by a package that
> > portage claims is not even installed:
> >
> > catherine ~ # emerge -av =dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1
In the middle of doing a major upgrade from very old pkgs to current
2008 and compiling lots and lots of stuff.
Seeing that line `checking for WHATEVER' go by 486,211 times so far
makes me wonder if there wouldn't be someway to cache all those
answers somewhere so whatever test is done for each li
"Brandon Mintern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Call me old school, but that method never takes me more than a few
> minutes to do. I am also someone in the vim camp. It fires up quickly
Unless you are updating a vmappliance built on old (even for 2006)
2006 pkgs to current 2008 pkgs.
I know thi
My cleanup routine pretty much involves running vim on
/var/lib/portage/world and going down the list. If I see something I
definitely don't need, I remove that line. If I see something that I
don't remember what it was, in another terminal (just an ALT-TAB away)
I run "esearch package-name". After
on Thursday 05/01/2008 Michael Sullivan([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> I'm trying to install a package that is being blocked by a package that
> portage claims is not even installed:
>
> catherine ~ # emerge -av =dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1.10-r1
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in or
James schrieb:
Justin j-schmitz.net> writes:
As the wiki says
I cannot seem to find this reference in any of the wikis
I use for Gentoo, perhaps a url so I can read more?
http://gentoo-wiki.com/CFLAGS#-fomit-frame-pointer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Justin j-schmitz.net> writes:
> As the wiki says
I cannot seem to find this reference in any of the wikis
I use for Gentoo, perhaps a url so I can read more?
> -fomit-frame-pointer tells gcc to omit frame pointers, freeing up an
> additional register on the CPU. This is mainly useful on x86
On Thu, 1 May 2008 18:52:20 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
> Today I made the "mistake" of upgrading my profile from
> default-linux/amd64/2007.0/desktop to
> default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop and it messed up eix &
> eix-test-obsolete.
> Before the change of profile the output was clean.
> Any su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James wrote:
|
| But in order to avoid recompiling all of those packages (for now)
| I can just add it to my CFlags and wait a few months, as another option?
Yes, there shouldn't any problems appear.
|
| Or is there real peril with this approach to sl
Hello,
I am compiling a vanilla-sources 2.6.24.4 kernel (2008.0_beta2 minimal
install) and no matter what I do to disable scsi support I end up with a
scsi module (scsi_wait_scan.mod) after compilation. When looking at the
.config file I see
CONFIG_SCSI=y
CONFIG_SCSI_DMA=y
CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:12:19PM +0200, Wolf Canis wrote:
> Michael George wrote:
> |
> | It was /etc/man-conf. A change in the NROFF definition caused the
> | problem. Running dispatch-conf didn't prompt me for the config change,
> | so I ran etc-update this time and found it.
> |
> | Hopeful
I'm trying to install a package that is being blocked by a package that
portage claims is not even installed:
catherine ~ # emerge -av =dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1.10-r1
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N] dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1.10-r1
James schrieb:
Hello,
On an amd64, If I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to a system's
CFLAGS setting, I can just add it and eventually all of the
executables will be recompile (willing to wait)
or do I have to rebuild system (all packages) or such to switch?
James
As the wiki says
SNIP
On Thursday 01 May 2008, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On an amd64, If I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to a system's
> CFLAGS setting, I can just add it and eventually all of the
> executables will be recompile (willing to wait)
> or do I have to rebuild system (all packages) or such to switch?
No
Wolf Canis googlemail.com> writes:
>
>
> James wrote:
> | Hello,
> |
> | On an amd64, If I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to a system's
> | CFLAGS setting, I can just add it and eventually all of the
> | executables will be recompile (willing to wait)
> | or do I have to rebuild system (all p
dany2a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You've got to update portage first, looks like you have an older portage
> version, that cannot handle lzma. Had the same prob and updating portage was
> the fix (besides installing lzma-utils).
> emerge -a1 portage
That was it.
Thanks very much.
Cheers,
Ro
I've emerged wireshark, and made myself a member of both the wireshark
group, and the tcpdump group, but still wireshark refuses to capture packets
if executed as a non root user. The error message is: "Couldn't run dumpcap
as a child process: Permission denied."
A little research indicated that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James wrote:
| Hello,
|
| On an amd64, If I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to a system's
| CFLAGS setting, I can just add it and eventually all of the
| executables will be recompile (willing to wait)
| or do I have to rebuild system (all packages)
Today I made the "mistake" of upgrading my profile from
default-linux/amd64/2007.0/desktop to default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop and
it messed up eix & eix-test-obsolete.
Here's a part of the output from eix-test-obsolete:
--8<
Installed packages with a versio
Hello,
On an amd64, If I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to a system's
CFLAGS setting, I can just add it and eventually all of the
executables will be recompile (willing to wait)
or do I have to rebuild system (all packages) or such to switch?
James
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing lis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael George wrote:
|
| It was /etc/man-conf. A change in the NROFF definition caused the
| problem. Running dispatch-conf didn't prompt me for the config change,
| so I ran etc-update this time and found it.
|
| Hopefully this will be helpful for
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> All kde all gnome all xorg for example, before update world.
>
> It seems fine in theory, but every time I've done it in real life I get
> into deep dependency trees that take more time to sort out than simply
> emerging world first.
>
> The trouble s
In gnome-2.20.3, how would I find out what Main
Menu->System->Administration->Printing tries to run? And where would
errors from attempting to run it be dumped to? When I run it, it fails
silently.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> vi was written by Bill Joy
> Bill Joy wrote lots of good stuff in BSD
> Our favourite OS owes a lot to BSD
> using vi pays homage to those magnificent BSD'ers of old
I second all the vi accolades.
I like the fact that Bill Joy was horribly drunk when
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Gavin Seddon wrote:
> Hi,I dl from skype.com and with gcc4~ IT WORKS!
> thanks
> g
I seem to remember having something similar. I think it was one of the
2.0.0 versions - 48? 63? Could never get it to work.
Eventually I just put an old ebuild in my overlay and used that
On Thursday 01 May 2008, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just gave 2008.0_beta2 Minimal a try and there is no make.defaults
> file in the profile directory
>
> /etc/make.profile -> ../usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0
>
> However there is a make.defaults file inside
> /usr/port
Hi,
I just gave 2008.0_beta2 Minimal a try and there is no make.defaults
file in the profile directory
/etc/make.profile -> ../usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0
However there is a make.defaults file inside
/usr/portage/profiles/default/linux
Is this how it should be?
Thanks,
--
Hi,I dl from skype.com and with gcc4~ IT WORKS!
thanks
g
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 08:20:44AM -0400, Michael George wrote:
> I noticed today that my man pages aren't displaying correctly. Whenever
> I view one, I see the ESC codes rather than seeing bold fonts, etc.
>
> I don't remeber when I last used man and it displayed correctly, but I
> can check ba
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Gavin Seddon wrote:
as per your original post. I recommend you upgrade gcc to version
4.1.2
thanks,
However I need gcc 3~ for some critical software. If I change to 4
'it' won't recompile. I suppose I could alternate profiles as
required.
I had
I noticed today that my man pages aren't displaying correctly. Whenever
I view one, I see the ESC codes rather than seeing bold fonts, etc.
I don't remeber when I last used man and it displayed correctly, but I
can check back 2 weeks this evening.
I have tried several terminals (xterm, gnome-ter
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Gavin Seddon wrote:
> > as per your original post. I recommend you upgrade gcc to version
> > 4.1.2
>
> I've altered gcc to 4 now I get
> 'skype
> Floating exception
did you run env-update and either source /etc/profile or log out/log in
first?
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Gavin Seddon wrote:
> > as per your original post. I recommend you upgrade gcc to version
> > 4.1.2
>
> thanks,
> However I need gcc 3~ for some critical software. If I change to 4
> 'it' won't recompile. I suppose I could alternate profiles as
> required.
I had that wit
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Gavin Seddon wrote:
Hi,
I used revdep-rebuild --SEARCH_DIRS /opt
with no luck. How do I check it to enable /opt?
thanks
g
revdep-rebuild will not solve your problem. It only fixes problems where
binaries used to link to other files that are no lo
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Gavin Seddon wrote:
Hi,
I used revdep-rebuild --SEARCH_DIRS /opt
with no luck. How do I check it to enable /opt?
thanks
g
revdep-rebuild will not solve your problem. It only fixes problems where
binaries used to link to other files that are no lo
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Gavin Seddon wrote:
> Hi,
> I used revdep-rebuild --SEARCH_DIRS /opt
> with no luck. How do I check it to enable /opt?
> thanks
> g
revdep-rebuild will not solve your problem. It only fixes problems where
binaries used to link to other files that are no longer there. It
Hi,
I used revdep-rebuild --SEARCH_DIRS /opt
with no luck. How do I check it to enable /opt?
thanks
g
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Mick wrote:
2008/4/30 Gavin Seddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
skype
/opt/skype/skype: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/libstdc++.so.6:
version `CXXABI_1.3.1' not found (required by /opt/skype/skype)
/opt/skype/skype: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/libstdc++.so.6:
version `GLIBCXX_3.4.4' n
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Danis Petkakis wrote:
> hello there i try to play .mkv files with kaffeine but there is no
> sound...when i play some .avi files the sound is proper...also when i play
> .mkv files with vlc sound is also ok...what might be the problem and i
> don't have any sound in .mkv
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 1 May 2008 10:30:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > What a horrible suggestion, not only does it use vi - three
> > > times! - but it ends with a goto!
> >
> > Here's a much more horrible thing: In which way does the
> > suggestion, horrible
On Thursday 01 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [2] vi /var/lib/portage/world
>
> What if I emerge -vC all I know I don't want.
>
> All kde all gnome all xorg for example, before update world.
It seems fine in theory, but every time I've done it in
On Thu, 1 May 2008 10:30:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > What a horrible suggestion, not only does it use vi - three times! -
> > but it ends with a goto!
>
> Here's a much more horrible thing: In which way does the suggestion,
> horrible as it is, depart from reality?
Your reality must be
On Thu, 1 May 2008 10:28:06 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Moving slightly off-topic, it would have been nice if portage had told
> you that you were trying to use an unsupported USE flag in a more
> obvious way than the simple yellow 'tcltk%' it currently gives. It's
> very easy to miss that in
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:17:34 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > [2] vi /var/lib/portage/world
> > Edit at will with sense of abandon
> > vi /etc/make.conf
> > Edit where appropriate
> > vi /etc/portage/*
> > Fearlessly
On Thursday 01 May 2008, John P. Burkett wrote:
> > eix reveals that the required USE flag is in fact "tk"
>
> Thanks, Alan! Changing the USE flag from tcltk to tk, as you
> suggested, was the key to getting R to find tcltk. After making that
> change, doing "emerge -C R" and "emerge R" was enough
84 matches
Mail list logo
